How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Trichotomy of the order on
Statement
For all exactly one of , , holds. In particular the order (Order on the natural numbers) is total.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The order on , where means and means with (Order on the natural numbers), and addition with , (Addition of natural numbers).
Left successor law: (Left successor law for addition).
Addition is associative (Addition is associative).
Every nonzero natural is a successor: for some (Every nonzero natural number is a successor).
for every (axiom P1 of The von Neumann naturals form a Peano system).
Cancellation: (Addition is cancellative).
Addition is commutative (Addition is commutative).
Proof
At most one of the three holds where equality is involved: forces and forces , so is incompatible with either strict relation.
The two strict relations are incompatible: if and then and with , so ; by commutativity [L7], , so by cancellation [L6]; yet [L4] gives, by the left successor law [L2], [L5], a contradiction.
For every one has , since by the recursion, with [L5].
Base case : for arbitrary , either , giving , or so [L1] with gives , that is ; so at least one of , , holds.
Inductive hypothesis: fix and assume that for every at least one of , , holds.
Successor step: for arbitrary , apply the hypothesis; if then with , and the recursion gives , so with [L5], giving ; if then , so with , giving ; if then with , so [L4], and the recursion gives while the left successor law [L2] gives , so , whence gives and gives ; in every case at least one of , , holds.
By the induction principle with base 1.4, hypothesis 1.5, and step 2.1, comparability holds for all , and with the incompatibilities 1.1 and 1.2 exactly one of , , holds, so the order is total.
Depends on
- Order on the natural numbers
- Addition of natural numbers
- Left identity for addition
- Left successor law for addition
- Addition is associative
- Addition is commutative
- Addition is cancellative
- Every nonzero natural number is a successor
- The von Neumann naturals form a Peano system
- The principle of mathematical induction
Used by
- Every nondegenerate interval of ℝ is uncountable Corollary
- lvertP(A)| = 2^| A| for finite A Corollary
- A list of six distinct reals with no strictly increasing sublist of length four and no strictly decreasing sublist of length three Counterexample
- A finite list of reals, and its strictly increasing and strictly decreasing sublists Definition
- Finite sums and finite products of natural numbers, ∑_k<n aₖ and ∏_k<n aₖ in ℕ Definition
- lceil m/n rceil for naturals m and n ≥ 1: the least q ∈ ℕ with m ≤ n q Definition
- The set [A]ᵏ of k-element subsets and the binomial coefficient binomnk := | [n]ᵏ| Definition
- Distributing a finite set over a finite set of boxes, with the ceiling bound computed and attained Example
- For n ≥ 1 the congruence classes modulo n form an abelian group (ℤ/n, +) of order n, generated by the class of 1 Example
- In a finite set with a symmetric irreflexive relation and at least two elements, two elements have equally many neighbours Example
- nℤ is a subgroup of (ℤ, +) for every n ∈ ℤ, and every subgroup of (ℤ, +) has this form Example
- FALSE: | A ∪ B| = | A| + | B| for all finite A and B False statement
- FALSE: the number of weak compositions of n into m parts is binomn+m-1m-1 for every m ∈ ℕ False statement
- A sequence of intervals covering [a,b] has total length at least b - a, so no interval of positive length has measure zero Lemma
- A strictly increasing index map satisfies nₖ ≥ k Lemma
- Cancellation for multiplication by a nonzero factor Lemma
- Every subset of an at most countable set is at most countable Lemma
- Exponent laws in a group: gᵐ⁺ⁿ = gᵐgⁿ and (gᵐ)ⁿ = gᵐⁿ for all m, n ∈ ℤ, and (gh)ⁿ = gⁿhⁿ **when g and h commute** Lemma
- Finite sums re-indexed along an injection, with a zero term deleted, and concatenated; and the closure properties of linear independence: an independent list is injective and never 0_V, its sublists are independent, a list is independent exactly when it is injective with linearly independent image, and every subset of a linearly independent set is linearly independent Lemma
- If ord(g) = n then gᵏ = e iff k is an integer multiple of n, the powers g⁰, …, gⁿ⁻¹ are distinct, and ⟨ g ⟩ has exactly n elements; if g has infinite order then gʲ = gᵏ only for j = k Lemma
- In a finite group, every element g satisfies gⁿ = e for some natural n ≥ 1 Lemma
- In a Hausdorff space a sequence converges to at most one point Lemma
- Laws of finite sums and products in ℕ, and ι(∑_k<n aₖ) = ∑_k<n ι(aₖ) Lemma
- On ℕ the order is membership: m < n ⟺ m ∈ n Lemma
- The greedy colouring bound χ(G)≤Δ(G)+1 for every nonnull finite graph Lemma
- The pigeonhole principle on ℕ Lemma
- ω is the least limit ordinal Lemma
- ≤ is a linear order on ℕ Theorem
- A countable union of measure-zero sets has measure zero, by countable choice Theorem
- A finite set with n elements has exactly binomn2 two-element subsets, and 2binomn2 = n(n-1) Theorem
- Any two finite free bases of the same group have the same cardinality Theorem
- Assuming countable choice, every perfectly normal space is completely normal: separated sets in a normal space whose open sets are all F_σ can be separated by disjoint open sets Theorem
- Division with remainder in ℤ: for a ∈ ℤ and b > 0 there are unique q, r ∈ ℤ with a = qb + r and 0 ≤ r < b Theorem
- Every list of mn+1 pairwise distinct reals has a strictly increasing sublist of length m+1 or a strictly decreasing sublist of length n+1 Theorem
- For a compact subset of ℝ, measure zero and content zero coincide Theorem
- For all m and n there is a list of mn pairwise distinct reals with no strictly increasing sublist of length m+1 and no strictly decreasing sublist of length n+1 Theorem
- For m ≥ 1 the number of weak compositions of n into m parts is binomn+m-1m-1, and the number of compositions is binomn-1m-1 for n ≥ 1 Theorem
- Generalised associativity: in a monoid the product of a finite list does not depend on the bracketing, and in a commutative monoid it does not depend on the order of the factors either Theorem
- If | A| > k| B| then every f : A → B has a fibre with more than k elements, and for nonempty B some fibre has at least lceil | A| / | B|rceil elements Theorem
- ℕ × ℕ ≈ ℕ Theorem
…and 7 more results.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 25 results over 12 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- T. Tao, Analysis I, 3rd ed., §2.1-2.3 (Peano axioms, recursion, arithmetic) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Mathematical induction (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- W. Aitken, MATH 378 Ch. 1: The Peano Axioms (CSU San Marcos) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Peano axioms (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)