Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (openai/gpt-5.4)audited 2026-07-25
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Trichotomy of the order on N\mathbb{N}

Statement

For all m,nNm, n \in \mathbb{N} exactly one of m<nm < n, m=nm = n, m>nm > n holds. In particular the order (Order on the natural numbers) is total.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The order on N\mathbb{N}, where mnm \le n means k (m+k=n)\exists k\ (m + k = n) and m<nm < n means mnm \le n with mnm \ne n (Order on the natural numbers), and addition with m+0=mm + 0 = m, m+σ(n)=σ(m+n)m + \sigma(n) = \sigma(m + n) (Addition of natural numbers).

[L1]

0+k=k0 + k = k (Left identity for addition).

[L2]

Left successor law: σ(a)+k=σ(a+k)\sigma(a) + k = \sigma(a + k) (Left successor law for addition).

[L3]

Addition is associative (Addition is associative).

[L4]

Every nonzero natural is a successor: n0n=σ(a)n \ne 0 \Rightarrow n = \sigma(a) for some aa (Every nonzero natural number is a successor).

[L5]

σ(x)0\sigma(x) \ne 0 for every xx (axiom P1 of The von Neumann naturals form a Peano system).

[L6]

Cancellation: x+k=y+kx=yx + k = y + k \Rightarrow x = y (Addition is cancellative).

[L7]

Addition is commutative (Addition is commutative).

Proof

technique · induction
1.1

At most one of the three holds where equality is involved: m<nm < n forces mnm \ne n and m>nm > n forces nmn \ne m, so m=nm = n is incompatible with either strict relation.

given
1.2

The two strict relations are incompatible: if m<nm < n and m>nm > n then m+j=nm + j = n and n+i=mn + i = m with i,j0i, j \ne 0, so m+(j+i)=(m+j)+i=n+i=m=m+0m + (j + i) = (m + j) + i = n + i = m = m + 0; by commutativity [L7], (j+i)+m=0+m(j + i) + m = 0 + m, so j+i=0j + i = 0 by cancellation [L6]; yet j=σ(a)j = \sigma(a) [L4] gives, by the left successor law [L2], j+i=σ(a)+i=σ(a+i)0j + i = \sigma(a) + i = \sigma(a + i) \ne 0 [L5], a contradiction.

givenL2L3L4L5L6L7
1.3

For every nn one has n<σ(n)n < \sigma(n), since n+σ(0)=σ(n+0)=σ(n)n + \sigma(0) = \sigma(n + 0) = \sigma(n) by the recursion, with σ(0)0\sigma(0) \ne 0 [L5].

givenL5
1.4

Base case n=0n = 0: for arbitrary mm, either m=0m = 0, giving m=nm = n, or m0m \ne 0 so 0+m=m0 + m = m [L1] with m0m \ne 0 gives 0<m0 < m, that is n<mn < m; so at least one of m<nm < n, m=nm = n, m>nm > n holds.

baseL1L4
1.5

Inductive hypothesis: fix nn and assume that for every mm at least one of m<nm < n, m=nm = n, m>nm > n holds.

ih
2.1

Successor step: for arbitrary mm, apply the hypothesis; if m<nm < n then n=m+kn = m + k with k0k \ne 0, and the recursion gives m+σ(k)=σ(m+k)=σ(n)m + \sigma(k) = \sigma(m + k) = \sigma(n), so σ(n)=m+σ(k)\sigma(n) = m + \sigma(k) with σ(k)0\sigma(k) \ne 0 [L5], giving m<σ(n)m < \sigma(n); if m=nm = n then m+σ(0)=σ(m+0)=σ(m)=σ(n)m + \sigma(0) = \sigma(m + 0) = \sigma(m) = \sigma(n), so σ(n)=m+σ(0)\sigma(n) = m + \sigma(0) with σ(0)0\sigma(0) \ne 0, giving m<σ(n)m < \sigma(n); if m>nm > n then m=n+im = n + i with i0i \ne 0, so i=σ(a)i = \sigma(a) [L4], and the recursion gives n+σ(a)=σ(n+a)n + \sigma(a) = \sigma(n + a) while the left successor law [L2] gives σ(n)+a=σ(n+a)\sigma(n) + a = \sigma(n + a), so m=n+σ(a)=σ(n+a)=σ(n)+am = n + \sigma(a) = \sigma(n + a) = \sigma(n) + a, whence a=0a = 0 gives m=σ(n)m = \sigma(n) and a0a \ne 0 gives σ(n)<m\sigma(n) < m; in every case at least one of m<σ(n)m < \sigma(n), m=σ(n)m = \sigma(n), m>σ(n)m > \sigma(n) holds.

step 1.5givenL2L4L5
3.1

By the induction principle with base 1.4, hypothesis 1.5, and step 2.1, comparability holds for all m,nm, n, and with the incompatibilities 1.1 and 1.2 exactly one of m<nm < n, m=nm = n, m>nm > n holds, so the order is total.

step 1.1step 1.2step 1.4step 2.1discharge-induction

Depends on

Used by

…and 7 more results.

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 25 results over 12 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources