How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Assuming countable choice, every perfectly normal space is completely normal: separated sets in a normal space whose open sets are all can be separated by disjoint open sets
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). Let be a perfectly normal space (Completely normal () and perfectly normal () spaces): is normal (Normal spaces and spaces, with the source disagreement over whether normality includes stated explicitly) and every closed subset of is a , equivalently every open subset of is an ( and subsets of a topological space, agreeing with the real-line notion). Then is completely normal: any two separated sets (Separated sets: ) admit disjoint open and .
Consequently implies .
No continuous function is constructed anywhere in the proof, and in particular Urysohn's lemma is not used. All that is consumed is normality, applied once to each member of a countable family of closed sets, and the presentation of two open sets.
Where the choice principle is spent, and why it is not removable as written. Step 4.1 selects, for each at once, one open set out of the nonempty family that normality provides for the closed set , and likewise one ; normality is an existence statement and supplies no rule for singling out a member, so extracting the two sequences is an application of and of nothing stronger. The hypothesis is stated in the theorem rather than hidden in the proof, as this library does everywhere.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A perfectly normal space and separated sets , so that .
and are separated: and (Separated sets: ).
Every open subset of is an : it is for some sequence of closed sets (Completely normal () and perfectly normal () spaces, and subsets of a topological space, agreeing with the real-line notion, Finite, countably infinite, countable, uncountable).
: for a family of nonempty sets indexed by there is a function choosing a member of each (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
In a normal space, disjoint closed sets and admit an open with (A space is normal if and only if every closed inside an open admits an open with , final assertion, Normal spaces and spaces, with the source disagreement over whether normality includes stated explicitly).
is closed and contains ; a set is closed exactly when it equals its closure; a set is closed exactly when its complement is open (A point lies in the closure of iff every basic neighbourhood of it meets ; the closure is the smallest closed superset and equals together with its derived set, claim 2, Interior, closure, boundary, exterior, derived set and isolated point in a topological space, Topology on a set, open and closed sets, clopen sets, the closed-set axiomatisation, and the coarser/finer comparison).
A union of finitely many closed sets is closed by iterating (C3), an arbitrary union of open sets is open by (T2), and an intersection of two open sets is open by (T3) (Topology on a set, open and closed sets, clopen sets, the closed-set axiomatisation, and the coarser/finer comparison).
For all exactly one of , , holds (Trichotomy of the order on ).
Proof
and , and both of these sets are open.
By [A2] fix sequences of closed sets with and .
For every the closed sets and are disjoint, since ; likewise and are disjoint closed sets.
By [L1] the set of open with is nonempty for each , and likewise the set of open with ; so [A3] supplies sequences and of open sets with , , and for every .
Define and .
and are open: for each the set is a union of finitely many closed sets, hence closed, so its complement is open and is an intersection of two open sets; the union over is then open.
: given , step 1.1 and step 2.1 put in some , while and give for every ; hence .
: given , step 1.1 and step 2.1 put in some , while and give for every ; hence .
Suppose ; then by step 5.1 there are with , for all , , and for all .
If in step 6.4 then satisfies , so ; but , which is impossible.
If in step 6.4 then satisfies , so ; but , which is impossible.
By [L4] one of and holds, so steps 7.1 and 7.2 exclude every case and no such exists: .
By steps 6.1, 6.2, 6.3 and 8.1 the sets and are disjoint open sets containing and respectively; since and were an arbitrary separated pair, is completely normal, and with the hypothesis this reads implies .
Remarks
-
The subtraction of the earlier closures is the entire trick. Each is still large enough to catch the part of that covers, because no point of lies in any ; and it is small enough that the two unions cannot meet, because a putative common point would be inside a that a later stage of has already removed, or inside a that a later stage of has removed. The comparison or is what decides which of the two it is.
-
Only the two closures and are used, never the sets and themselves beyond membership, which is why the hypothesis is exactly separation and not disjointness. For disjoint sets that are not separated the argument breaks at step 6.2.
-
The converse is not proved here and is not asserted. Perfect normality asks a countability condition of every closed set that complete normality never mentions, so the two are not the same hypothesis; but no witness separating them is exhibited in this library, and nothing above claims one exists.
-
The hereditary reading is not used. Complete normality is equivalent to the normality of every subspace, and some texts prove this theorem in that language; the argument above works directly with the separated-sets definition and never passes to a subspace.
Depends on
- Completely normal ($T_5$) and perfectly normal ($T_6$) spaces
- Normal spaces and $T_4$ spaces, with the source disagreement over whether normality includes $T_1$ stated explicitly
- Separated sets: $\overline{A} \cap B = A \cap \overline{B} = \varnothing$
- $G_\delta$ and $F_\sigma$ subsets of a topological space, agreeing with the real-line notion
- A space is normal if and only if every closed $A$ inside an open $U$ admits an open $V$ with $A \subseteq V \subseteq \overline{V} \subseteq U$
- Interior, closure, boundary, exterior, derived set and isolated point in a topological space
- A point lies in the closure of $A$ iff every basic neighbourhood of it meets $A$; the closure is the smallest closed superset and equals $A$ together with its derived set
- Topology on a set, open and closed sets, clopen sets, the closed-set axiomatisation, and the coarser/finer comparison
- Finite, countably infinite, countable, uncountable
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- Trichotomy of the order on $\mathbb{N}$
Used by
- Assuming countable choice, perfect normality, and hence T₆, is hereditary Corollary
- Conventions on this page, and the one implication of the classical chain that is not available at this point in the reading order Remark
- Which results on this page spend dependent choice, which spend countable choice, and which are theorems of ZF Remark
- The implications proved on this page: perfectly normal gives completely normal under countable choice, and completely normal gives normal; normal with T₁ gives T₃; completely regular gives regular; regular with T₁ gives Urysohn, hence Hausdorff, hence T₁, hence T₀; and metrizable gives every one of them Theorem
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 98 results over 26 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Normal space (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Separated sets (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- R. Engelking, General Topology, §1.5 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Gδ set (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)