How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A finite set with elements has exactly two-element subsets, and
Statement
Let be a finite set with . Then the set of two-element subsets of is finite with
and, for every , the identity
holds in , the difference being the truncated one. Equivalently, in , for every .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite set with , and . The difference is the truncated one, equal to at .
, is finite, and for (The set of -element subsets and the binomial coefficient , The cardinality of a finite set).
for ( for ; hence , the quotient is a natural number, and , clause 1).
Falling factorials and factorials (The factorial and the falling factorial , defined by recursion in ): , , and .
Arithmetic of : multiplication is commutative, , (Multiplication is commutative, Zero and one under multiplication, Multiplication of natural numbers); and (Order on the natural numbers).
The embedding is additive, multiplicative and injective, and for (clauses 0 and 7 of Laws of finite sums and products in , and , The canonical natural of a field); is an ordered field, so a nonzero element is invertible (Field, Ordered field).
Trichotomy in (Trichotomy of the order on ).
Proof
The first assertion is the definition: is finite and by [L1], because .
The falling factorial at : and , using [L3] and [L4].
Let . Then [L2] with gives , that is by step 1.2 and ; commutativity turns this into .
The two remaining values of . If then , so by [L1], and the right-hand side is by [L4]. If then , so , and the right-hand side is . In both cases , so with step 2.1 and trichotomy the identity holds for every .
The real form. For we have , so and ; applying to step 3.1 then gives , and is invertible, so . At both sides are , the left by step 3.1 and the right because .
The count is step 1.1, the identity in is step 3.1, and its real form is step 4.1.
Remarks
-
This is a count of unordered pairs, stated purely as a count. No geometric or relational vocabulary appears, because none is available at this point in the reading order. Later pages will want exactly this quantity, and they may cite it from here.
-
Both small cases are checked. At and there are no two-element subsets and both sides are ; the truncated difference is what makes the right-hand side come out rather than undefined at .
-
The real form is not the definition. is a real number that happens to be the canonical natural of a count; the identity in is the primary statement and the division is a convenience.
Depends on
- $\binom{n}{k}\,k!\,(n-k)! = n!$ for $k \le n$; hence $\binom{n}{k}\,k! = n^{\underline{k}}$, the quotient $n!/(k!(n-k)!)$ is a natural number, and $\binom{n}{k} = \binom{n}{n-k}$
- The set $[A]^{k}$ of $k$-element subsets and the binomial coefficient $\binom{n}{k} := \lvert [n]^{k}\rvert$
- The factorial $n!$ and the falling factorial $n^{\underline{k}}$, defined by recursion in $\mathbb{N}$
- The cardinality $\lvert A\rvert$ of a finite set
- Laws of finite sums and products in $\mathbb{N}$, and $\iota\big(\sum_{k<n} a_k\big) = \sum_{k<n} \iota(a_k)$
- The canonical natural $\iota(n) = n \cdot 1_F$ of a field
- Multiplication of natural numbers
- Multiplication is commutative
- Zero and one under multiplication
- Order on the natural numbers
- Trichotomy of the order on $\mathbb{N}$
- Field
- Ordered field
Used by
- The complete graph on an n-element vertex set has binomn2 edges Corollary
- There are 2^binomn2 simple graphs on a fixed labelled n-element vertex set Corollary
- The Petersen graph on the two-element subsets of a five-element set, adjacent when disjoint Definition
- For a finite symmetric irreflexive relation the sum of the neighbour counts is twice the number of unordered related pairs Example
- The Petersen graph has ten vertices, is cubic, has girth five and has κ=λ=3 Example
- An n-vertex simple graph with more than binomn-12 edges is connected Theorem
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 69 results over 23 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Binomial coefficient (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Combination (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Falling and rising factorials (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)