Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

nZn\mathbb{Z} is a subgroup of (Z,+)(\mathbb{Z}, +) for every nZn \in \mathbb{Z}, and every subgroup of (Z,+)(\mathbb{Z}, +) has this form

Example

Work in the abelian group (Z,+,0)(\mathbb{Z}, +, 0). For nZn \in \mathbb{Z} put

nZ  :=  {nk  :  kZ}.n\mathbb{Z} \;:=\; \{\, nk \;:\; k \in \mathbb{Z} \,\}.

Then:

  1. nZn\mathbb{Z} is a subgroup of (Z,+)(\mathbb{Z},+) for every nZn \in \mathbb{Z} (Subgroup), and nZ=nn\mathbb{Z} = \langle n \rangle (The subgroup S\langle S \rangle generated by a subset, the cyclic subgroup g\langle g \rangle, and cyclic groups);
  2. conversely, every subgroup H(Z,+)H \le (\mathbb{Z},+) equals nZn\mathbb{Z} for some n0n \ge 0; and nn may be taken to be 00 if H={0}H = \{0\} and otherwise the least positive element of HH.

In particular every subgroup of (Z,+)(\mathbb{Z},+) is cyclic.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The abelian group (Z,+,0)(\mathbb{Z},+,0) (The integers as equivalence classes of pairs of naturals, Arithmetic on the integers, Group and abelian group), and the embedding ι:NZ\iota : \mathbb{N} \to \mathbb{Z} of The naturals embed in the integers.

[L1]

Z\mathbb{Z} is a commutative ring, with uv:=u+(v)u - v := u + (-v) (The integers form a commutative ring, Arithmetic on the integers); its order is total, antisymmetric, transitive and compatible with addition, and positives are closed under multiplication (The integers form a totally ordered ring, Order on the integers).

[L2]

ι\iota is injective, preserves addition, multiplication and order, and its image is exactly the nonnegative integers; ι(0)=0\iota(0) = 0, ι(1)=1\iota(1) = 1 (The naturals embed in the integers).

[L3]

One-step test for subgroups, written additively: a nonempty HZH \subseteq \mathbb{Z} with xyHx - y \in H for all x,yHx, y \in H is a subgroup (One-step subgroup test: a nonempty HGH \subseteq G is a subgroup iff gh1Hgh^{-1} \in H for all g,hHg, h \in H; the identity and the inverses of HH are then those of GG, Subgroup).

[L5]

Division with remainder: for aZa \in \mathbb{Z} and b>0b > 0 there are q,rZq, r \in \mathbb{Z} with a=qb+ra = qb + r and 0r<b0 \le r < b (Division with remainder in Z\mathbb{Z}: for aZa \in \mathbb{Z} and b>0b > 0 there are unique q,rZq, r \in \mathbb{Z} with a=qb+ra = qb + r and 0r<b0 \le r < b).

[L6]

Every nonempty subset of N\mathbb{N} has a least element (The well-ordering principle).

[L7]

On N\mathbb{N}: exactly one of s<ts < t, s=ts = t, t<st < s holds (Trichotomy of the order on N\mathbb{N}); every k0k \ne 0 is a successor σ(j)=1+j\sigma(j) = 1 + j, so k0k \ne 0 gives 1k1 \le k (Every nonzero natural number is a successor, Addition is commutative, Order on the natural numbers, The natural numbers N\mathbb{N} (von Neumann)).

[L8]

Induction on N\mathbb{N} (The principle of mathematical induction).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

nZn\mathbb{Z} is nonempty, containing 0=n00 = n \cdot 0; and for x=nkx = nk, y=nky = nk' in it, xy=nknk=n(kk)nZx - y = nk - nk' = n(k - k') \in n\mathbb{Z} by distributivity. By the one-step test nZn\mathbb{Z} is a subgroup of (Z,+)(\mathbb{Z},+).

L1L3
1.2

In the additive group (Z,+)(\mathbb{Z},+) the kk-th power of nn is nknk. For kNk \in \mathbb{N} this holds by induction: the 00-th power is the identity 0=n00 = n \cdot 0, and the power at σ(k)\sigma(k) is the power at kk plus nn, which is nι(k)+n=n(ι(k)+1)=nι(σ(k))n\iota(k) + n = n(\iota(k)+1) = n\iota(\sigma(k)). For a negative integer xx with x=ι(k)-x = \iota(k), the xx-th power is the additive inverse of nι(k)n\iota(k), namely n(ι(k))=nxn(-\iota(k)) = nx.

L1L2L4L8
1.3

Let H(Z,+)H \le (\mathbb{Z},+) with H{0}H \ne \{0\}. Choose xHx \in H with x0x \ne 0; then xH-x \in H as well, and by totality one of xx, x-x is positive, so HH contains a positive integer.

L1L3choose
2.1

Hence n\langle n \rangle, the set of integer powers of nn, is exactly {nk:kZ}=nZ\{\, nk : k \in \mathbb{Z} \,\} = n\mathbb{Z}. With step 1.1 this is claim 1.

step 1.1step 1.2L4
2.2

Every positive integer is ι(k)\iota(k) for a unique kNk \in \mathbb{N} with k0k \ne 0, hence with k1k \ge 1. So S:={kN:k1 and ι(k)H}S := \{\, k \in \mathbb{N} : k \ge 1 \text{ and } \iota(k) \in H \,\} is nonempty by step 1.3; let mm be its least element and put n:=ι(m)n := \iota(m), a positive element of HH.

step 1.3L2L6L7
3.1

nZHn\mathbb{Z} \subseteq H: by step 2.1, nZ=nn\mathbb{Z} = \langle n \rangle, and n\langle n \rangle is contained in every subgroup containing nn, in particular in HH.

step 2.1step 2.2L4
4.1

HnZH \subseteq n\mathbb{Z}: let hHh \in H and divide h=qn+rh = qn + r with 0r<n0 \le r < n, legitimate since n>0n > 0. Then qnnZHqn \in n\mathbb{Z} \subseteq H, so r=hqnHr = h - qn \in H because HH is closed under subtraction. If r>0r > 0 then r=ι(t)r = \iota(t) with t1t \ge 1, and ι(t)<ι(m)\iota(t) < \iota(m) gives t<mt < m, since otherwise mtm \le t would give ι(m)ι(t)\iota(m) \le \iota(t), contradicting antisymmetry; that puts tt in SS below its least element, which is impossible. Hence r=0r = 0 and h=qnnZh = qn \in n\mathbb{Z}.

step 2.2step 3.1L1L2L3L5L7
5.1

So H=nZH = n\mathbb{Z} with nn the least positive element of HH; and if H={0}H = \{0\} then H=0ZH = 0\mathbb{Z}, since 0k=00 \cdot k = 0 for every kk. This is claim 2, and with claim 1 it shows every subgroup of (Z,+)(\mathbb{Z},+) is n\langle n \rangle for some n0n \ge 0, hence cyclic.

step 2.1step 2.2step 3.1step 4.1L1L4

Remarks

  • Both halves use the division algorithm, but only the second one visibly. The first half is pure closure arithmetic; the second is the standard argument that a subgroup containing a least positive element nn can contain nothing strictly between the multiples of nn, and it is exactly Division with remainder in Z\mathbb{Z}: for aZa \in \mathbb{Z} and b>0b > 0 there are unique q,rZq, r \in \mathbb{Z} with a=qb+ra = qb + r and 0r<b0 \le r < b that produces the offending remainder.

  • nn and n-n generate the same subgroup, since (n)k=n(k)(-n)k = n(-k), so the nn in claim 2 is unique only after normalising it to be nonnegative. The normalisation is what the phrase "the least positive element" achieves.

  • Inclusion among these subgroups is divisibility: mZnZm\mathbb{Z} \subseteq n\mathbb{Z} holds exactly when nmn \mid m. Indeed the inclusion applied to k=1k = 1 gives mnZm \in n\mathbb{Z}, that is m=ncm = nc for some cc; and conversely m=ncm = nc gives mk=n(ck)nZmk = n(ck) \in n\mathbb{Z} for every kk. The systematic study of the divisibility relation belongs to a later page.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 66 results over 21 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources