Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

nZ is a subgroup of (Z,+) for every n∈Z, and every subgroup of (Z,+) has this form

Example

Work in the abelian group (Z,+,0). For n∈Z put

nZ  :=  { nk  :  k∈Z }.

Then:

  1. nZ is a subgroup of (Z,+) for every n∈Z (Subgroup), and nZ=⟨n⟩ (The subgroup ⟨S⟩ generated by a subset, the cyclic subgroup ⟨g⟩, and cyclic groups);
  2. conversely, every subgroup H≤(Z,+) equals nZ for some n≥0; and n may be taken to be 0 if H={0} and otherwise the least positive element of H.

In particular every subgroup of (Z,+) is cyclic.

Facts & Assumptions

[L1]

Z is a commutative ring, with u−v:=u+(−v) (The integers form a commutative ring, Arithmetic on the integers); its order is total, antisymmetric, transitive and compatible with addition, and positives are closed under multiplication (The integers form a totally ordered ring, Order on the integers).

[L2]

ι is injective, preserves addition, multiplication and order, and its image is exactly the nonnegative integers; ι(0)=0, ι(1)=1 (The naturals embed in the integers).

[L3]

One-step test for subgroups, written additively: a nonempty H⊆Z with x−y∈H for all x,y∈H is a subgroup (One-step subgroup test: a nonempty H⊆G is a subgroup iff gh−1∈H for all g,h∈H; the identity and the inverses of H are then those of G, Subgroup).

[L5]

Division with remainder: for a∈Z and b>0 there are q,r∈Z with a=qb+r and 0≤r<b (Division with remainder in Z: for a∈Z and b>0 there are unique q,r∈Z with a=qb+r and 0≤r<b).

[L6]

Every nonempty subset of N has a least element (The well-ordering principle).

[L7]

On N: exactly one of s<t, s=t, t<s holds (Trichotomy of the order on N); every k≠0 is a successor σ(j)=1+j, so k≠0 gives 1≤k (Every nonzero natural number is a successor, Addition is commutative, Order on the natural numbers, The natural numbers N (von Neumann)).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

nZ is nonempty, containing 0=n⋅0; and for x=nk, y=nk′ in it, x−y=nk−nk′=n(k−k′)∈nZ by distributivity. By the one-step test nZ is a subgroup of (Z,+).

L1L3
1.2

In the additive group (Z,+) the k-th power of n is nk. For k∈N this holds by induction: the 0-th power is the identity 0=n⋅0, and the power at σ(k) is the power at k plus n, which is nι(k)+n=n(ι(k)+1)=nι(σ(k)). For a negative integer x with −x=ι(k), the x-th power is the additive inverse of nι(k), namely n(−ι(k))=nx.

L1L2L4L8
1.3

Let H≤(Z,+) with H≠{0}. Choose x∈H with x≠0; then −x∈H as well, and by totality one of x, −x is positive, so H contains a positive integer.

L1L3choose
2.1

Hence ⟨n⟩, the set of integer powers of n, is exactly { nk:k∈Z }=nZ. With step 1.1 this is claim 1.

step 1.1step 1.2L4
2.2

Every positive integer is ι(k) for a unique k∈N with k≠0, hence with k≥1. So S:={ k∈N:k≥1 and ι(k)∈H } is nonempty by step 1.3; let m be its least element and put n:=ι(m), a positive element of H.

step 1.3L2L6L7
3.1

nZ⊆H: by step 2.1, nZ=⟨n⟩, and ⟨n⟩ is contained in every subgroup containing n, in particular in H.

step 2.1step 2.2L4
4.1

H⊆nZ: let h∈H and divide h=qn+r with 0≤r<n, legitimate since n>0. Then qn∈nZ⊆H, so r=h−qn∈H because H is closed under subtraction. If r>0 then r=ι(t) with t≥1, and ι(t)<ι(m) gives t<m, since otherwise m≤t would give ι(m)≤ι(t), contradicting antisymmetry; that puts t in S below its least element, which is impossible. Hence r=0 and h=qn∈nZ.

step 2.2step 3.1L1L2L3L5L7
5.1

So H=nZ with n the least positive element of H; and if H={0} then H=0Z, since 0⋅k=0 for every k. This is claim 2, and with claim 1 it shows every subgroup of (Z,+) is ⟨n⟩ for some n≥0, hence cyclic.

step 2.1step 2.2step 3.1step 4.1L1L4∎

Remarks

  • Both halves use the division algorithm, but only the second one visibly. The first half is pure closure arithmetic; the second is the standard argument that a subgroup containing a least positive element n can contain nothing strictly between the multiples of n, and it is exactly Division with remainder in Z: for a∈Z and b>0 there are unique q,r∈Z with a=qb+r and 0≤r<b that produces the offending remainder.

  • n and −n generate the same subgroup, since (−n)k=n(−k), so the n in claim 2 is unique only after normalising it to be nonnegative. The normalisation is what the phrase "the least positive element" achieves.

  • Inclusion among these subgroups is divisibility: mZ⊆nZ holds exactly when n∣m. Indeed the inclusion applied to k=1 gives m∈nZ, that is m=nc for some c; and conversely m=nc gives mk=n(ck)∈nZ for every k. The systematic study of the divisibility relation belongs to a later page.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

52 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources