How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Morse-Sard for Euclidean maps
Statement
Let , let be open, and let be a map with
Then the critical value set of is a null subset of .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An integer and a map with .
The critical value set is the image of the critical locus (The critical locus and critical value set).
Compact null sections reassemble into a null set, and the nonflat and flat critical strata have null images under the hypotheses of the preceding lemmas (Compact null sections imply a compact set is null, Sard on the nonflat critical strata, Sard on the infinitely flat critical stratum).
If a Euclidean map has invertible derivative at a point, it becomes a coordinate there after shrinking (The Euclidean inverse function theorem).
Proof
If , then is at most a point, so is [F1, given, choose, cases] finite and is finite. Every finite subset of is null, so the theorem follows. Assume henceforth that . Exhaust by countably many compact cubes with interiors contained in . It is enough to show that is null for every , because the critical value set in [F1] is the countable union of those images.
Fix one cube and put [L1, step 1.1, algebra] Then For each and each , the set is compact and contained in . Because the nonflat lemma in [L1] shows that is null. Also, the set is compact, and the hypothesis implies ; thus the flat lemma in [L1] makes null.
It remains to show that is null. [L1, L2, step 1.1, algebra] If , then a linear map is surjective exactly when it is nonzero, so and there is nothing to prove. Assume , and fix . Some first partial derivative of some component of is nonzero at ; after reordering coordinates and components, assume By [L2], after shrinking choose a neighbourhood of and a diffeomorphism from onto an open set . Write Each slice map is , and because the induction hypothesis applies to those maps. If , then in these coordinates the differential of has block form so is critical for exactly when is a critical point of the slice . Now choose an open neighbourhood of with compact closure . The compact set has sections contained in the critical value sets of the slice maps, hence null in by induction. Applying the slicing lemma in [L1] shows that is null in . A countable subcover of by the neighbourhoods therefore makes null.
Step 2.1 shows that is null for every [F1, step 2.1, step 2.2, step 1.1] and that is null, while step 2.2 handles . Hence is null. Applying step 1.1 shows that the whole critical value set of is null.
Depends on
Used by
- Sard's theorem does not hold for every C¹ map False statement
- Morse-Sard for smooth manifolds Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
22 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Marco Gualtieri, Topology I: Smooth Manifolds, cumulative notes (standard reference, not scraped)
- Encyclopedia of Mathematics, Sard theorem (standard reference, not scraped)