Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A relative map cell kills its class with the correct fundamental-group action

Statement

Assume ACω. Let f:M→X be based, with M a connected smooth manifold and X path connected. Attach an n-cell to M, n≥2, along g:Sn−1→M, and extend f over its characteristic disk by h:Dn→X. Let F:W=M∪gDn→X be the extension, and let x∈πn(f) be the relative map class represented by (h,g). Then πi(F)≅πi(f) for 1≤i<n, and the natural map πn(f)→πn(F) is onto. For n≥3 its kernel is the subgroup generated by the π1(M)-translates of x. If f∗:π1(M)→π1(X) is an isomorphism, this is exactly the Z[π1(X)]-submodule generated by x. For n=2 the kernel is the normal subgroup generated by the π1(M)-translates of x; no abelian module assertion is made unless the relative group and action have separately been identified as an abelian module. For a single 1-cell instead, the relative fundamental pointed set changes from cosets of H=f∗π1(M) in π1(X) to cosets of ⟨H,ℓ⟩, where ℓ is the loop obtained from the image of the new core and paths in M from its endpoints to the basepoint.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

The mapping cylinder identifies the source with its bottom face and the target with its top face. Mapping cylinder and mapping cone

[F2]

A cofibration permits extension of a prescribed homotopy from its subspace while retaining the initial map. Cofibration and homotopy extension property

[F3]

Under Countable Choice, Euclidean-valued maps have fine smooth approximations fixed near the prescribed closed smooth region. Relative Whitney approximation for Euclidean-valued maps

[F4]

The critical values of a sufficiently differentiable Euclidean map form a null set. Morse-Sard for Euclidean maps

[F5]

A transverse inverse image has dimension equal to source dimension minus target codimension. The transverse preimage theorem

[F6]

Relative homotopy is a group in degrees at least two, abelian in degrees at least three, with the specified basepoint action. Relative homotopy operations are well defined in their valid degrees

[F7]

The relative homotopy sequence of a triple is exact in its specified group degrees, with a pointed-set endpoint. Relative homotopy exact sequence of a triple in group degrees

[F8]

Seifert–van Kampen identifies the fundamental group with a group pushout. Seifert–van Kampen identifies the fundamental group with a group pushout

Proof

Given: Countable choice and the specified cell and extension. Write Z for the mapping cylinder of F, so M⊂W⊂Z and Z retracts onto X.

1.1givenconstructF1F2

The inclusion of the original mapping cylinder of f into Z fixes M and is a homotopy equivalence: both cylinders retract onto the same X, and their maps onto X commute. Its inverse up to homotopy relative to M can be constructed by extending the cylinder contraction across the characteristic disk with its specified map h; equivalently use the mapping-cylinder homotopy-extension property. Thus πi(Z,M)=πi(f), with the disk of W mapping to the specified class x. By definition πi(Z,W)=πi(F).

1.2givenconstructalgebraF3F4F5

We verify the only relative-cell input directly. A disk map into (W,M) has all its boundary in M. In the open attached cell smooth its Euclidean coordinate map near the inverse image of a small closed ball about the cell centre, using finitely many interior source bumps and Euclidean relative approximation. Choose a regular point in that small ball by Sard. For a source dimension less than n its preimage is empty, since a transverse inverse image would have negative dimension. Radially retract the punctured cell from that point onto its boundary and leave M fixed; this retracts W minus that point onto M. Consequently πi(W,M)=0 for i<n. No smoothness of the attaching map or of X is needed; all smoothing takes place inside the open Euclidean cell and off the source boundary.

2.1step 1.2constructF6

For a source n-disk the regular-point preimage in step 1.2 is finite, since it is discrete and contained in a compact interior set. Small disjoint disks about these points map locally diffeomorphically to the cell, with orientation degree +1 or −1. On their complement retract the map into M by the same punctured-cell retraction. Join these small disks to the marked outer boundary point by a finite embedded tree of thin tubes in the source, arranged disjointly away from their common endpoint. Cutting along this tree is the standard disk description of relative multiplication: each small disk contributes the characteristic relative disk or its inverse, and the image of its tube, after retraction, supplies a path in M carrying its marked value to the basepoint. Comparing that path with the fixed characteristic-disk path gives the π1(M) action. For n≥3 the relative group is abelian, so this is a sum of signed translates. For n=2 it is an ordered product; changing the cutting order or tube produces conjugates, so the image in any target relative group is the normal subgroup generated by those translates. Conversely every translate and its inverse is represented by the corresponding whiskered characteristic disk, and every conjugate maps to that normal subgroup. This proves the exact image description needed below, not freeness of a degree-two relative group.

3.1step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1constructF7

The natural exact sequence of the triple M⊂W⊂Z reads πn(W,M)→πn(Z,M)→πn(Z,W)→πn−1(W,M). The last term vanishes by step 1.2, hence the middle map is surjective and its kernel is the image computed in step 2.1, namely the stated orbit-generated subgroup, with normal closure in degree two. Both neighbouring groups πi(W,M),πi−1(W,M) vanish in lower group degrees, so the triple sequence gives the asserted lower isomorphisms. In degree one, the image of π1(M) in π1(X) is unchanged: attaching a cell of dimension at least two only adds relations represented by loops whose image under f is already null by the disk extension. The relative degree-one coset description therefore gives the same pointed set. If f∗ is an isomorphism, identify the action group with π1(X); for n≥3 the group is abelian and its action is precisely a group-ring module action.

4.1step 3.1constructF8∎

For a 1-cell, van Kampen says the new core adjoins a loop to the fundamental group of the connected M. Under F its image is ℓ, so the image subgroup in π1(X) becomes ⟨H,ℓ⟩. Paths from the basepoint classify the relative fundamental pointed set by cosets of that image, yielding the stated low-degree formulation. This uses no nonexistent relative degree-zero group or abelian module structure. The case x=0 in higher degrees gives a zero orbit-generated kernel, and all degree ranges and choices were specified.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

44 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources