Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A rational homology four-ball has square boundary torsion order

Statement

Assume AC. Let W be a compact connected oriented smooth 4-manifold with connected boundary M and the rational homology of a point. Then M is a rational homology 3-sphere and ∣H1(M;Z)∣ is a square.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A compact connected oriented smooth 4-manifold W with connected boundary M and Hi(W;Q)=0 for i>0; all homology and cohomology groups below have integral coefficients unless a coefficient field is written.

[F1]

A compact smooth manifold has finitely generated homology: the double along a collared boundary is a compact smooth manifold without boundary, which has the homotopy type of a CW complex, its compact image under the equivalence lies in a finite subcomplex, and the folding retraction shows the manifold is homotopy dominated by that finite complex (Collar neighborhood theorem, Smooth manifolds have CW homotopy type, The image of a compact space lies in a finite CW subcomplex, Cellular homology computes singular homology).

[F2]

Poincare-Lefschetz duality for the compact oriented 4-manifold W with boundary M gives isomorphisms Hp(W)≅H4−p(W,M) and Hp(W,M)≅H4−p(W) (Poincaré–Lefschetz duality), and the homology of the pair fits in the long exact sequence ⋯→Hi(M)→Hi(W)→Hi(W,M)→Hi−1(M)→⋯ (Long exact sequence of a pair).

[F3]

The cohomology universal coefficient theorem over the PID Z gives short exact sequences 0→Ext⁡(Hn−1(X),Z)→Hn(X)→Hom⁡(Hn(X),Z)→0 (The universal coefficient theorem for cohomology over a PID), and finitely generated abelian groups decompose into free and cyclic torsion parts (The fundamental theorem of finitely generated abelian groups from PID modules).

[F4]

The Axiom of Choice is assumed in the statement; through AC implies DC implies countable choice it supplies countable choice for collaring, while the CW, duality and universal-coefficient inputs themselves assume full AC (The Axiom of Choice, The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F5]

Under AC, homology universal coefficients compute Hi(W;Q) from integral homology by 0→Hi(W;Z)⊗Q→Hi(W;Q)→Tor⁡(Hi−1(W;Z),Q)→0 (The universal coefficient theorem for homology over a PID). For finitely generated integral groups the Tor term is zero: it is zero on a free summand, and on Z/n it is the kernel of multiplication by n on Q, also zero.

Proof

technique · direct; compute the rational and integral homology of $W$ and $M$ by duality and the pair sequence, then compare orders in the resulting exact sequence
1.1F1F2F3F5givenalgebra

By [F1] the integral homology groups of W and M are finitely generated. By [F5], the rational homology hypothesis makes Hi(W;Z)⊗Q=0 for i>0; finite generation and the decomposition of [F3] therefore make those integral groups finite. Apply [F3] also with coefficient module Q: the Hom terms vanish in positive degrees and the Ext terms for finite cyclic groups vanish because multiplication by their orders is onto on Q. Thus Hi(W;Q)=0 for i>0 and H0(W;Q)=Q. Duality [F2] gives Hi(W,M;Q)=0 for i≠4, and H4(W,M;Q)=Q. The pair sequence now gives H3(M;Q)=Q, H1(M;Q)=H2(M;Q)=0, and H0(M;Q)=Q. Hence M is a rational homology sphere and H1(M) is finite. Integral duality on M, followed by [F3], gives H2(M)≅H1(M)=0: the Ext term for H0(M)=Z and the Hom term for finite H1(M) both vanish. Likewise H3(W,M)≅H1(W)=0. These are exactly the vanishings needed in the order calculation.

2.1F2F3step 1.1algebra

Put A:=H2(W) and B:=H1(W); both are finite, because W is rationally a point and the groups are finitely generated by [F1]. Duality [F2] and the cohomology universal coefficient sequence [F3] give H2(W,M)≅H2(W)≅Ext⁡(B,Z) and H1(W,M)≅H3(W)≅Ext⁡(A,Z), the Hom terms vanishing because A,B are finite. For a finite abelian group F decomposed into cyclic summands, the sequence 0→Z→nZ→Z/n→0 computes Ext⁡(Z/n,Z)=Z/n, so ∣Ext⁡(F,Z)∣=∣F∣.

3.1F1F2F3F4step 2.1algebra∎

The long exact sequence of the pair (W,M) in low degrees, using H2(M)=0 and the isomorphism H0(M)→H0(W) of connected spaces, reads 0→A→Ext⁡(B,Z)→H1(M)→B→Ext⁡(A,Z)→0. Split it into the short exact sequences 0→A→Ext⁡(B,Z)→K→0 and 0→K→H1(M)→B′→0, where K is the image of Ext⁡(B,Z) and B′ the image of H1(M); then ∣K∣=∣B∣/∣A∣ and ∣H1(M)∣=∣K∣⋅∣B′∣. The third short exact sequence 0→B′→B→Ext⁡(A,Z)→0, the last map being surjective by exactness at the final term, gives ∣B′∣=∣B∣/∣Ext⁡(A,Z)∣=∣B∣/∣A∣ by step 2.1. Hence ∣H1(M)∣=(∣B∣/∣A∣)2. The injection A↪Ext⁡(B,Z) makes ∣A∣ divide ∣B∣=∣Ext⁡(B,Z)∣, so ∣B∣/∣A∣ is a positive integer and ∣H1(M)∣ is a square. Choice enters only through [F4] and the cited inputs.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

83 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources