Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The double cover branched over a slice disk is a rational homology ball

Statement

Assume AC. If D⊂B4 is a smooth proper embedded disk, the connected double cover W→B4 branched along D is a compact connected oriented smooth 4-manifold with Hi(W;F2)=0 for i>0, hence Hi(W;Q)=0 for i>0. Its boundary is the double cover of S3 branched over ∂D.

Here a proper embedded disk means a smooth embedding of the closed disk D2 whose interior lies in the interior of B4 and whose boundary circle lies in S3=∂B4; the embedding is taken neat, so it meets S3 transversely along ∂D and carries a boundary collar. All homology below is singular homology.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A smooth proper (neat) embedded disk D⊂B4 with ∂D⊂S3, its normal bundle ν(D) in B4, and the full Axiom of Choice ([F1]).

[F1]

AC is The Axiom of Choice; it implies Dependent Choice and Countable Choice (AC implies DC implies countable choice, The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). The collaring and tubular inputs need countable choice; bundle homotopy invariance, the CW input and universal coefficients are cited here under full AC.

[F2]

The collar neighbourhood theorem supplies boundary collars for D and for B4, so after a small isotopy supported near ∂D the disk is neat, meeting S3 orthogonally along ∂D with a product structure ∂D×[0,1) in B4; consequently the boundary of a tubular neighbourhood of D is split as ∂D×D2 (the part in S3) and D×S1 (the part in the interior), glued along the torus ∂D×S1 (Collar neighborhood theorem).

[F3]

Double the collared pair (B4,D) along (S3,∂D). This gives a smooth closed ambient double and a closed embedded doubled disk. Apply The tubular neighbourhood theorem in a smooth ambient manifold there, choosing its metric and normal addition symmetric on the product collar, and restrict to the original half. This supplies a tubular map from a neighbourhood of the zero section of ν(D). Since D is contractible, Homotopy invariance of vector-bundle pullback under AC trivializes ν(D). Compactness gives a sufficiently small closed disk subbundle, whose image is N≅D×D2, with N∩S3=∂D×D2. The tube is a disk subbundle, rather than the whole noncompact normal bundle (Smooth vector bundles, rank, fibres, and trivial bundles).

[F4]

Let p:Y~→Y be a two-sheeted covering of a path-connected Y and give the singular chain groups coefficients in F2; since the standard simplices are simply connected, every singular simplex of Y lifts to Y~ (Lifting criterion for maps from path-connected locally path-connected spaces). Writing T for the map sending a simplex to the sum of its two lifts and P for the projection of chains, the sequence 0→C∗(Y;F2)→TC∗(Y~;F2)→PC∗(Y;F2)→0 is exact: P∘T=0, T is injective because the two lifts of each simplex are distinct basis elements, and lifts of different simplices project to different basis elements, and a chain lies in ker⁡P exactly when each of its simplices occurs together with its translate, which exhibits it as T of a chain. The long exact homology sequence of a short exact sequence of chain complexes applies to it (The long exact sequence in homology).

[F5]

If Y is nonempty, path-connected, locally path-connected and semilocally simply connected, a surjection π1(Y,y0)→Z/2 determines a connected double cover of Y: the kernel acts on the universal cover and the quotient is a connected covering realizing it (Every subgroup acts on the universal cover with a connected quotient covering that realizes it, Covering maps, evenly covered neighbourhoods, fibres, sheets, and trivial coverings); the first Hurewicz map identifies π1(Y,y0)ab with H1(Y;Z) (The first Hurewicz map is abelianization).

[F6]

The universal coefficient theorem for homology over the PID Z gives, for every space X and every i, a short exact sequence 0→Hi(X;Z)⊗F2→Hi(X;F2)→Tor⁡(Hi−1(X;Z),F2)→0 (The universal coefficient theorem for homology over a PID).

[F7]

Every second-countable smooth manifold has the homotopy type of a CW complex, and the image of a compact space under a map into a CW complex lies in a finite subcomplex (Smooth manifolds have CW homotopy type, The image of a compact space lies in a finite CW subcomplex, Cellular homology computes singular homology).

[F8]

For an open cover X=A∪B (or collar-thickenings of the manifold pieces used here), the Mayer-Vietoris sequence is exact, in reduced form as well, and reduces the homology of X to that of A, B and A∩B; a contractible space has the homology of a point (Mayer–Vietoris sequence in singular homology).

Proof

technique · direct; compute the homology of the disk complement by Mayer-Vietoris, pass to the connected double cover, glue the branched model and finish with finite generation and universal coefficients
1.1F2F3givenconstruct

By [F2] we may take D neat, so the closed tubular neighbourhood N of [F3] is diffeomorphic to D×D2, with N∩S3=∂D×D2 and with ∂N split into the two solid tori ∂D×D2⊆S3 and D×S1, glued along the torus ∂D×S1. Then Y:=B4∖int⁡N‾, with its corners rounded, is a compact 4-manifold with boundary and B4=N∪Y with N∩Y=D×S1, which is homotopy equivalent to S1 with generator the meridian circle {x}×S1.

2.1F8step 1.1algebra

Mayer-Vietoris [F8] for the collar-thickened open cover of B4 by the interiors of enlarged N and Y, retracting to N,Y,N∩Y respectively, with N and B4 contractible and N∩Y≃S1 gives Hi(Y;Z)=0 for every i≥2, because Hi(N∩Y) vanishes there and Hi(B4) vanishes for i≥1; in degree one it makes H1(N∩Y;Z)→H1(Y;Z) an isomorphism, since the preceding term H2(B4) vanishes and H1(N)=0, so H1(Y;Z)≅Z is generated by the meridian; in reduced degree zero all terms of H~0(N∩Y)→H~0(N)⊕H~0(Y)→H~0(B4) vanish except possibly the middle, so Y is connected.

3.1F4F5step 1.1step 2.1algebra

The connected manifold Y is path-connected, and its ball or half-ball charts give contractible neighbourhoods, so it is locally path-connected and semilocally simply connected. Fix a basepoint in Y. By [F5] the composite π1(Y)→H1(Y;Z)≅Z→Z/2 (reduction mod 2) is a surjection, so it determines a connected double cover p:Y~→Y. Over F2 the singular chains of the cover form the short exact sequence of [F4], and its long exact homology sequence together with step 2.1 gives: H0(Y;F2)=F2, T∗:H0(Y;F2)→H0(Y~;F2) is zero and P∗:H0(Y~;F2)→H0(Y;F2) is an isomorphism (the cover is connected), so the connecting map H1(Y;F2)→H0(Y;F2) is an isomorphism; consequently P∗=0 in degree one and T∗:H1(Y;F2)→H1(Y~;F2) is an isomorphism; and Hi(Y~;F2)=0 for i≥2.

4.1F2step 3.1construct

The preimage in Y~ of the solid torus N∩Y≅D×S1 is connected, because the meridian has odd class in Z/2, and the covering restricts to the model (x,z)↦(x,z2) of D×S1 onto itself; naturality of the transfer in step 3.1 shows that its upstairs meridian generates H1(Y~;F2): the transfer of a downstairs circle is the sum of its two lifted half-circle paths, hence the single upstairs circle. Glue a copy of D×D2 to Y~ by a diffeomorphism of its boundary solid torus onto that upstairs overlap, identifying the upstairs circle coordinate z with itself; its projection downstairs is (x,z)↦(x,z2); after rounding corners the result W is a compact connected smooth 4-manifold, and the gluing map exhibits W→B4 as a branched double cover whose restriction off D is the covering p and whose local model at D is (x,z)↦(x,z2) in complex normal coordinates; pulling back the orientation of B4 along this branched cover orients W, and the boundary ∂W is the double cover of S3 branched along ∂D.

5.1F8step 3.1step 4.1algebra

Mayer-Vietoris [F8] over F2 for collar-thickened open pieces retracting to the displayed pieces of W=Y~∪(D×D2) with overlap D×S1, whose H1 maps isomorphically onto H1(Y~;F2) by step 4.1, while Hi(D×D2;F2)=Hi(D×S1;F2)=0 for i≥2 and Hi(Y~;F2)=0 for i≥2 by step 3.1, yields Hi(W;F2)=0 for every i>0 and, by the reduced degree-zero segment, H~0(W)=0, so W is connected; the exact piece in degrees two and one is 0→H2(W)→H1(D×S1)→≅H1(Y~)→H1(W)→0, so H2(W)=H1(W)=0.

6.1F1F6F7step 5.1algebra∎

The double DW=W∪∂WW of W along its collared boundary is a compact smooth 4-manifold without boundary, hence by [F7] has the homotopy type of a CW complex whose compact image lies in a finite subcomplex K′; the folding retraction r:DW→W collapsing the second copy onto the first through the collar satisfies r∣W=idW, so composing an equivalence, its inverse and r exhibits W as a homotopy retract of the finite CW complex K′. Therefore every Hi(W;Z) is finitely generated. For i>0, the universal coefficient sequence of [F6] injects Hi(W;Z)⊗F2 into Hi(W;F2)=0 by step 5.1, so Hi(W;Z) has no nontrivial free part; tensoring with Q gives Hi(W;Q)=Hi(W;Z)⊗Q=0 for i>0. This completes the proof; full AC is used for the bundle homotopy-invariance, CW and universal-coefficient suppliers, and supplies the countable choice needed for collaring and tubes.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

115 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources