How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Relative homotopy exact sequence of a triple in group degrees
Statement
Let , with subspace topologies. For the sequence is natural in based maps of triples and exact at its three middle terms. Here are inclusion maps, and is the boundary for followed by the relative map for . All arrows between displayed groups are homomorphisms. The last term when is a pointed set; exactness at the preceding term means inverse image of its distinguished point. No exactness after this pointed target and no relative degree-zero object are asserted. These statements hold without choice and without CW hypotheses.
Facts & Assumptions
Relative homotopy classes and groups fixes the cubical representative convention. Relative homotopy operations are well defined in their valid degrees proves relative group laws for degrees at least two, and functoriality including the pointed degree-one boundary.
Relative cubical disk model and compression says that a null relative class is represented by a disk compressible into the subspace through a homotopy fixed on its entire boundary. Its cubical and disk models identify the based sphere boundary used here.
Long exact sequence of relative homotopy groups supplies exactness and naturality of each pair sequence, including its group and pointed ranges.
Proof
Given: The based triple and . Write and for the relative maps, and use subscripts on inclusions to specify their spaces.
By [F1, F3], define , with the analogous degree-shifted formula at the last arrow. Inclusion and restriction to the distinguished cubical face commute with a based map of triples, so every square of these sequences commutes. In degrees with group structures these operations are homomorphisms. In particular the first arrow and are homomorphisms even when ; the last arrow then remains only pointed.
We prove exactness at . The composite is zero: an absolute boundary from dies in by [F3], hence also in its relative group. Conversely let satisfy . Its boundary in is zero by naturality, so [F3] gives with . Since , the pair sequence for gives with . Therefore is killed by , and the pair sequence for gives with . Applying , whose composite with is zero, yields . All subtractions here take place in absolute degree- groups and their homomorphic images, with .
At , an element represented by a cube in becomes null in : increasing its last coordinate to one contracts it to while allowing its distinguished face to stay in . Thus . Conversely if maps to zero under , take its disk representative with boundary in . Nullity in and [F2] compress this disk into while fixing its entire original boundary in . The endpoint is a relative representative for , and the compression is a homotopy of representatives for because it fixes that boundary and its marked point. This is an -preimage of .
At , the boundary of a representative from lies entirely in , so its relative class in is null by the same last-coordinate contraction; hence . Conversely represent by , with , , and bottom face a based cube in . If , the relative class of in is null. By [F2], there is a homotopy in from to a cube entirely in , fixed at on . This also applies when , since it is nullity in pointed relative degree one with a full-boundary-fixed compression.
Insert that homotopy as a bottom collar. For set and put . The seam values both equal ; the denominator is at least . Joint continuity, including at , follows by closed pasting on the two closed regions and : the first formula is defined also at their common point , where it equals , and the second formula there equals . Each bottom face stays in , and all other faces stay at . At the bottom face is . Thus is a relative representative whose image under is . This proves exactness at the third middle term.
Steps 2.1, 2.2 and 3.1 prove both image inclusions at all asserted terms. The statement does not require group operations on the final pointed set, exactness there, or any assertion about relative degree zero. A specified excludes an empty , while equal spaces in the triple give zero relative groups and the same formulas. Constant representatives, zero classes and coincident inclusions retain the displayed endpoint and boundary values. Only finitely many witnesses for a single element were instantiated in each argument; no representative or compression was selected for a family of classes. Thus the entire natural exact segment is choice-free.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- May, A Concise Course, Chapter11 §3 p86, triple sequence; Hatcher Theorem4.23 Case3 p363. Complete group-degree proof supplied locally. (standard reference, not scraped)