How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Morse-Sard for maps from manifolds with boundary
Statement
Assume . Let be in the local-extension sense, where is boundaryless and . The union of critical values of and is null; values regular for both restrictions are dense.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , a map in the local-extension sense, a boundaryless target , and .
The interior is a boundaryless smooth -manifold and, for , the boundary is a boundaryless smooth -manifold (The interior is an open smooth n-manifold; The boundary of a positive-dimensional manifold is a closed embedded smooth (n-1)-manifold).
A Euclidean map from dimension to positive dimension , with , has a null critical-value set (Morse-Sard for Euclidean maps).
Under , countable unions and subsets of manifold null sets are null (Countable unions and subsets of manifold null sets are null).
Proof
If , every differential to the zero tangent space is surjective, so both critical-value sets are empty. Suppose . By [L1] and second countability, choose countable coordinate covers of and, when , of , refining them so each image lies in a target chart. Each coordinate representative has a Euclidean extension. Since also implies , [L2] makes every chartwise critical-value set null.
By [L3], each restriction-critical-value set and their union are null. A manifold null set has empty interior, so its complement is dense; that complement consists exactly of the values regular for both restrictions. Together with the case of step 1.1, this proves the claim.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
18 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ioan Mărcuț, Manifolds (2017 lecture notes), §§14.5, 15.1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Will Merry, Differential Geometry (2021), Lecture 24 (standard reference, not scraped)