Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Euler number of a clutched bundle as the clutching degree

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice exactly as inherited from the Euler-class and duality suppliers. Let E→S4 be an oriented rank-four real bundle, with the base, equatorial and fibre orientations fixed in Quaternionic clutching bundles ξh,j over S4, clutched over S4=D+4∪S3D−4 by a smooth map g:S3→SO(4). Then ⟨e(E),[S4]⟩=deg⁡(a↦g(a)v0/∥v0∥), where v0 is any nonzero vector of the fibre and the degree is computed with the equatorial orientation of the source and the fibre orientation of the target. For the basic left and right quaternion multiplications g1,0(a)v=av and g0,1(a)v=va this degree is +1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The oriented rank-four bundle E→S4 clutched by g:S3→SO(4), the upper-to-lower convention (a,v)+∼(a,g(a)v)−, a unit vector v0 of the fibre, and the orientations of Quaternionic clutching bundles ξh,j over S4.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice is assumed, as inherited from the Euler-class and duality suppliers (The Axiom of Choice).

[L1]

The Euler class is e(E)=s∗j∗uE, where uE is the normalized Thom class of E and s is the zero section (Euler class by zero-section pullback of the Thom class).

[L2]

Assume AC. If s:S4→E is a smooth section transverse to the zero section with zero locus Z, then with the induced orientation e(E)∩[S4]=(iZ)∗[Z]; equivalently ⟨e(E),[S4]⟩ is the signed count of the zeros of s (The zero locus of a transverse section represents the Euler dual).

[L3]

Let N⊆Rm be a compact smooth m-submanifold with boundary and Y a smooth vector field on N with only isolated zeros and Y≠0 on ∂N; then ∑x:Y(x)=0ind⁡xY=deg⁡(∂N→Sm−1, x↦Y(x)/∣Y(x)∣) (The index sum of an outward field is the Gauss degree).

[L4]

A nondegenerate zero of a vector field has index sign⁡det⁡(DYp)∈{+1,−1} (The index of a nondegenerate vector-field zero).

[L5]

The geometric degree is an isomorphism π3(S3)→Z sending the identity to +1 (Based sphere maps are classified by degree), and the identity, constant and reflection maps have the standard degrees (Degree of identity constant reflection and antipodal sphere maps).

[L6]

The critical values of a smooth Euclidean map form a null set (Morse-Sard for Euclidean maps), hence contain no open ball.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L1givenconstruct

Put s+=v0 on the upper hemisphere. By the upper-to-lower transition, the lower boundary value must be s−(a)=g(a)v0. Extend this value to a smooth map F:D−4→R4, constant in the radial coordinate near the boundary and zero near the centre, by a smooth radial cutoff. It agrees with the constant upper section through the equatorial product charts. The base orientation on D−4 is its standard coordinate orientation, and its coordinate boundary orientation is the source orientation fixed in the statement.

2.1step 1.1L6choose

The map F is nonzero on a boundary strip. Choose a smooth cutoff ρ equal to one on the compact complement of that strip, supported away from the boundary, and with its transition region inside the strip. By [L6] choose a sufficiently small regular value t of F on the open disk. Then Ft=F−ρt has no zeros in the transition strip, while every remaining zero lies where ρ=1 and has invertible derivative DF. Thus the section with s+=v0, s−=Ft is smooth and transverse to zero, with a finite zero set in the lower open disk.

3.1step 2.1L2L3L4A1

By [L2] its signed zero count is ⟨e(E),[S4]⟩. On the positively oriented lower disk each local contribution is sign⁡det⁡DFt, the index of the coordinate vector field Y=Ft by [L4]. Hence [L3] gives ⟨e(E),[S4]⟩=deg⁡(a↦Y(a)/∣Y(a)∣)=deg⁡(a↦g(a)v0), since the boundary was fixed and v0 is unit. Scaling a nonzero v0 to unit length gives the displayed general formula.

4.1step 3.1L5given∎

For either basic clutching choose v0=1. Both boundary maps are then a↦a, of degree +1 by [L5]. For any other unit v0, a path from 1 to v0 in S3 gives a homotopy of the boundary maps, so their degree is unchanged. This proves both calibrations in the stated orientation convention.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

72 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources