How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Restrictions, corestrictions, and products of smooth maps are smooth
Statement
Let and be smooth maps of smooth manifolds.
- If is open, with its restricted smooth structure, then the restriction is smooth.
- If is open and , then the corestriction is smooth for the restricted smooth structure on .
- The product map is smooth for the canonical product smooth structures.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Smooth maps and of smooth manifolds.
An open subset of a smooth manifold carries a canonical restricted smooth structure (An open subset of a smooth manifold has a canonical restricted smooth structure).
Identity maps and composites of smooth maps are smooth (Identity maps and composites of smooth maps are smooth).
A map into a product smooth manifold is smooth exactly when its component maps are smooth (A map into a product is smooth iff its components are smooth).
Products of smooth manifolds carry canonical product smooth structures (Products of smooth manifolds have a canonical product smooth structure).
Proof
Let be open. [F1, F2] By [F1] the subset is a smooth manifold, and the inclusion has identity coordinate representative in restricted charts, hence is smooth. Since , [F2] makes smooth.
By [F4] the source and target products are smooth manifolds. [F2, F3, F4] The first component of is , and the second is , where the projections are smooth in product charts because they are ordinary Euclidean coordinate projections. Hence [F2] makes both components smooth, and then [F3] makes smooth.
Let be open and suppose . [F1, F2, step 1.1] By [F1] the subset is a smooth manifold, and the inclusion is smooth by the same restricted-chart identity argument as in step 1.1. In charts of inherited from , the corestriction has exactly the same Euclidean representative as , so it is smooth.
Step 1.1 proves the restriction claim, step 2.1 proves the corestriction claim, and step 1.2 proves the product claim.
Depends on
- Identity maps and composites of smooth maps are smooth
- A map into a product is smooth iff its components are smooth
- A map from a disjoint union is smooth iff each restriction is smooth
- An open subset of a smooth manifold has a canonical restricted smooth structure
- Products of smooth manifolds have a canonical product smooth structure
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
26 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Rob van der Vorst, Introduction to differentiable manifolds, §2 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Nigel Hitchin, Differentiable Manifolds, §2.4 (standard reference, not scraped)