How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A regular level set is an embedded submanifold
Statement
Let be smooth, let be a regular value, and assume is nonempty. Then is an embedded submanifold of codimension . Equivalently, it has dimension .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A smooth map and a regular value with nonempty fibre.
A regular value is one whose fibre points are all submersion points; the fibre may be empty (Regular and critical points and values).
Codimension means ambient dimension minus submanifold dimension, and embedded submanifolds are defined by slice charts (Codimension and hypersurfaces, Embedded submanifolds and slice charts).
Near any submersion point, suitable coordinates put into the form (Local normal form for submersions).
Proof
Let be arbitrary. By [F1], is a submersion at .
Apply [L1] at . In suitable charts around and , the map becomes on . After centering , the fibre is . Permuting the two source-coordinate blocks sends it to the standard slice . Thus is locally an embedded submanifold.
Since every point of the fibre has such a slice neighbourhood, is an embedded submanifold. Its local model has dimension , so by [F2] the codimension is .
Depends on
Used by
- Countably many concentric circles give an injective immersion that is not an embedding Counterexample
- A cylinder is the preimage of a circle under a projection Example
- The special linear group is a codimension-one embedded submanifold Example
- An injective immersion need not be an embedding False statement
- The intrinsic topology of an immersed submanifold need not be the subspace topology False statement
- The graph of a smooth map is an embedded submanifold Proposition
- The tangent space of a regular level set is the kernel Proposition
- Transverse intersections of coordinate slices have the expected local form Proposition
- The preimage theorem for submanifolds under submersions Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John M. Lee, Introduction to Smooth Manifolds, Level Sets (standard reference, not scraped)
- Will J. Merry, Differential Geometry, Theorem 6.10 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Nigel Hitchin, Differentiable Manifolds, Theorem 3.3 (standard reference, not scraped)