Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Self-intersection of the zero section in an oriented plane bundle

Example

Assume AC. Let S2⊆R3 be the unit sphere with its induced orientation and let E be a smooth oriented rank-2 real bundle over S2; write Z⊆E for the zero section, a compact closed oriented surface embedded in the boundaryless 4-manifold E, oriented by base tangent first and fibre second. Then Z⋅Z=⟨e(E),[S2]⟩∈Z. Two cases are computed. (a) For the trivial bundle E=S2×R2 the constant section x↦(x,(1,0)) is nowhere zero, so Z pushes off itself disjointly and Z⋅Z=0. (b) For the tangent bundle E=TS2, the explicit field X(p)=e3−z p on p=(x,y,z)∈S2 (the tangential projection of the constant field e3, i.e. the gradient of the height function for the induced Euclidean metric) is a smooth section vanishing exactly at the two poles ±e3; in the projection charts (x,y)↦(x,y,±1−x2−y2) at the two poles its linearization is −(x∂x+y∂y)+O(∣(x,y)∣2) at e3 and +(x∂x+y∂y)+O(∣(x,y)∣2) at −e3, both with determinant +1 in dimension two, so both zeros are nondegenerate of index +1 and the signed zero count is 2; hence Z⋅Z=2. The trivial bundle realizes 0 and the tangent bundle realizes 2; no general clutching classification is asserted here.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, the unit sphere S2⊆R3 with its induced orientation, an oriented rank-two real bundle E→S2, its zero section Z (a closed oriented surface in the boundaryless oriented four-manifold E) and the two bundles of the statement.

[F1]

For a closed oriented A with 2dim⁡A=dim⁡M the self-intersection satisfies A⋅A=⟨e(νA),[A]⟩ (The self-intersection number is the Euler number of the normal bundle).

[F2]

If an oriented bundle admits a nowhere-zero section then its Euler class vanishes, and the geometric consequences include e(E)∩[M]=0 and, when rank equals dimension, ⟨e(E),[M]⟩=0 and vanishing integral self-intersections for nowhere-zero normal fields when the ambient manifold and embedded submanifold are integrally oriented and the normal orientation is their induced tangent-first orientation (A nowhere-zero section forces the Euler data to vanish).

[F3]

The local oriented intersection sign of the push-off equals the local zero index of the section, ε=sign⁡det⁡∂νsx (Normal push-off zeros are the self-intersection points).

[F4]

S2 is the unit sphere in R3, and it is a regular level set of a smooth function, hence an embedded submanifold with TpS2=p⊥ (Euclidean spheres and closed balls as subspaces of Rn, A regular level set is an embedded submanifold, The tangent space of a regular level set is the kernel).

[F5]

The tangent bundle is the disjoint union of the tangent spaces and a smooth section assigns compatibly smooth vectors, so X(p)=e3−zp defines a smooth section of TS2 (The tangent bundle as a disjoint union, Smooth sections, local sections, and support, Smoothness of a section is equivalent to smooth local components).

Verification

technique · apply the self-intersection/Euler-number theorem and compute the signed zero count of an explicit section
1.1F1F5given

By The zero section is a smooth embedding the zero section is embedded, and in bundle charts the splitting along it is TE∣Z=TS2⊕E, so its quotient normal bundle is E with the specified fibre orientation, and Z is compact, so [F1] gives Z⋅Z=⟨e(νZ),[Z]⟩=⟨e(E),[S2]⟩.

2.1F2step 1.1

Case (a): the constant unit section x↦(x,(1,0)) is smooth and nowhere zero, so by [F2] both the Euler number and the self-intersection vanish: ⟨e(E),[S2]⟩=0=Z⋅Z for the trivial bundle.

3.1F1F3F4F5step 1.1algebra∎

Case (b): S2 is the regular level set ∣p∣2=1 of a smooth function [F4] with TpS2=p⊥, so X(p)=e3−zp satisfies X(p)⋅p=z−z∣p∣2=0 and is a smooth section of TS2 by [F5]. It vanishes iff e3=zp, i.e. iff p=±e3. In the projection charts (x,y)↦(x,y,±1−x2−y2) near the poles the linearizations are −(x∂x+y∂y)+O(∣(x,y)∣2) at e3 and +(x∂x+y∂y)+O(∣(x,y)∣2) at −e3, whose Jacobians −I and +I both have determinant +1 in dimension two, and the chart-orientation sign cancels between source and target in the local index [F3]. Hence both zeros are nondegenerate of index +1 and the signed zero count is 2; [F1] and [F3] identify it with Z⋅Z and with ⟨e(TS2),[S2]⟩.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

83 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources