How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The tangent space of a regular level set is the kernel
Statement
Let be smooth, let be a regular value, and let . Then
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A smooth map , a regular value , and a point .
A regular value has only submersion points in its fibre (Regular and critical points and values).
The fibre is an embedded submanifold (A regular level set is an embedded submanifold).
Near a submersion point, suitable coordinates put into the form (Local normal form for submersions).
Chart maps are diffeomorphisms onto open Euclidean sets (Chart maps are diffeomorphisms onto Euclidean open sets).
Differentials satisfy the chain rule (The chain rule for differentials of smooth maps).
Proof
Because is a regular value and , [F1] makes a submersion at . Write , , and . By [L2], choose local coordinates near and in which the representative of is on , with and sent to the origins. Then the fibre is represented by the slice . By [L1], this is the embedded-submanifold structure on the fibre near , so its tangent vectors are exactly the vectors of the form .
Let be the coordinate projection. Step 1.1 makes near the distinguished point. By [L3], the differentials and are isomorphisms, and [L4] gives Because has kernel , one gets Step 1.1 identifies the same subspace with , so .
Therefore the intrinsic tangent space of the regular level set equals .
Depends on
Used by
- The kernel distribution of a constant-rank submersion is integrable Corollary
- Zero-level symplectic reduction and the dimension formula Corollary
- Antipodal points on a round sphere have many minimizing geodesics Counterexample
- A great sphere is totally geodesic Example
- Assuming countable choice, the normal bundle of the sphere is trivial Example
- Cut locus of a point on a round sphere Example
- General and special linear Lie groups Example
- Great circles as round-sphere geodesics Example
- Hyperbolic space as so zero n one mod so n Example
- Killing jacobi fields from rotations Example
- Self-intersection of the zero section in an oriented plane bundle Example
- SL(n) as a closed Lie subgroup of GL(n) Example
- The diagonal in the two-sphere has self-intersection two Example
- The normal line of an oriented hypersurface is trivial Example
- The round sphere has positive constant sectional curvature Example
- Christoffel symbols vanishing at one point implies curvature vanishes there False statement
- Normal coordinates make the metric Euclidean throughout the chart False statement
- The characteristic kernel on a regular moment level Lemma
- At a conjugate endpoint the index form is degenerate Proposition
- Euclidean formal immersions are homotopy equivalent to Stiefel-bundle sections Proposition
- Hessian of distance in terms of radial jacobi fields Proposition
- Invariant Hamiltonians descend to reduced Hamiltonians Proposition
- Level-set distributions are involutive Proposition
- Regular common level sets are Lagrangian submanifolds Proposition
- Round sphere model geometry Proposition
- Tangent space of a homogeneous quotient Proposition
- Characteristic-class vanishing is only necessary for embedding Remark
- Marsden--Weinstein--Meyer symplectic reduction Theorem
- Reduction in stages for free proper regular actions Theorem
- Smale's classification of sphere immersions in Euclidean space Theorem
- The preimage theorem for submanifolds under submersions Theorem
- The transverse preimage theorem Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
17 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Will J. Merry, Differential Geometry, Proposition 6.15 (standard reference, not scraped)