How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Invariant Hamiltonians descend to reduced Hamiltonians
Statement
Assume . Let be a Hamiltonian -space with a -invariant Hamiltonian , let be a regular value of , and suppose acts freely and properly on the level , with reduction and quotient map . Then:
- is tangent to the level and is -invariant, so it pushes forward to a smooth vector field on ;
- is -invariant and descends to a unique smooth with ;
- ; consequently every integral curve of that lies in the level projects under to an integral curve of the flow of on .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , a Hamiltonian -space with invariant Hamiltonian , a regular value , and a free proper -action on the level.
is countable choice; it is used only through the reduction, fundamental-field and descent suppliers cited below.
If is -invariant then for all , and is constant along the flow of . Noether's conservation law for Hamiltonian actions.
is the unique field with , and for the Poisson bracket. Hamiltonian vector fields exist uniquely for smooth functions, Poisson bracket on a symplectic manifold.
Reduction gives the smooth quotient and (Marsden--Weinstein--Meyer symplectic reduction). The free proper action quotient theorem makes a smooth surjective submersion for this quotient structure (Free proper action quotient manifold).
A continuous map constant on quotient fibres factors uniquely through the quotient, and a smooth submersion has local coordinate form . For a quotient map , a map out of is continuous iff its composite with is; a continuous map on constant on the fibres of factors uniquely through ; and a composite of quotient maps is a quotient map, Local normal form for submersions.
Integral curves of a smooth vector field through a given initial point are unique. Through each point there is a unique maximal integral curve.
At a regular level, (The tangent space of a regular level set is the kernel).
Proof
is tangent to the level: for every , by [F1] and [F2], so lies in and hence in by [F6].
is invariant under the action: since is -invariant, for and , for all , so nondegeneracy gives .
By steps 1.1 and 1.2 the field is -invariant and tangent to the level, so is well defined: for with one has because . It is smooth: by [F4], submersion coordinates for have the form ; fixing gives a smooth local section . There , interpreting as its tangent restriction to the level, so this local expression is smooth.
By invariance, is constant on the fibres of , so [F4] gives a unique continuous with . Near every point of , the submersion has a smooth local section by [F3] and [F4], by fixing the fibre coordinates as above, and there ; hence is smooth.
The projected field is the Hamiltonian field of : for , using [F3]; since is onto, , and uniqueness of Hamiltonian fields [F2] gives .
If is an integral curve of lying in the level, then is an integral curve of by the chain rule, and by uniqueness of integral curves [F5] it agrees on its interval of definition with the reduced integral curve through the projected initial point. Thus the restricted flow projects wherever the original curve is defined; no completeness or equality of maximal time intervals is asserted. If the level is empty, there is a unique empty descended function and vector field and every assertion is vacuous.
Depends on
- Free proper action quotient manifold
- The tangent space of a regular level set is the kernel
- Noether's conservation law for Hamiltonian actions
- Marsden--Weinstein--Meyer symplectic reduction
- For a quotient map $q : X \to Y$, a map out of $Y$ is continuous iff its composite with $q$ is; a continuous map on $X$ constant on the fibres of $q$ factors uniquely through $q$; and a composite of quotient maps is a quotient map
- Local normal form for submersions
- Hamiltonian vector fields exist uniquely for smooth functions
- Through each point there is a unique maximal integral curve
- Poisson bracket on a symplectic manifold
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
47 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Eckhard Meinrenken, Symplectic Geometry (standard reference, not scraped)
- Ana Cannas da Silva, Lectures on Symplectic Geometry (standard reference, not scraped)