Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Free proper action quotient manifold

Statement

If a Lie group G acts smoothly, freely, and properly on a smooth manifold M, then the orbit space M/G with its quotient topology is a Hausdorff second-countable smooth manifold of dimension dimMdimG. It has a unique smooth structure for which the quotient map q:MM/G is a smooth surjective submersion.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A smooth free proper left action of G on M, and the orbit map q:MM/G with the quotient topology.

[F1]

Every xM has a submanifold slice S for which G×SGS is a diffeomorphism onto an open saturated neighborhood. Local slice for a free proper action.

[F5]

A submersion has projection normal form and therefore admits smooth local sections. The constant-rank theorem for manifolds.

Proof

technique · use the slices as quotient charts
1.1

The map q is open: if OM is open, then q1(q(O))=gGgO is open, so q(O) is open by the quotient topology. It is a continuous surjection by definition and hence also satisfies [F2].

F2given
1.2

The orbit relation R={(gx,x):gG,xM} is closed in M×M. To see this without a sequential choice argument, first note that the proper map Θ:G×MM×M is closed. If CG×M is closed and zΘ(C), local compactness gives an open neighborhood V of z inside a compact set K. Then CΘ1(K) is compact, so its image A is compact and hence closed by [F4]. The open set VA contains z and misses Θ(C), because every point of V lies in K. Thus Θ(C) is closed. Taking C=G×M gives that R is closed.

F3F4given
2.1

Distinct orbits have representatives x,y with (x,y)R. By step 1.2 and the product topology, there are neighborhoods Ux and Vy with (U×V)R=. The open sets q(U) and q(V) from step 1.1 are disjoint: a common orbit would contain some uU and vV, putting (u,v) in R. Hence M/G is Hausdorff.

step 1.1step 1.2
2.2

If {Bj:jN} is a countable base of M, then {q(Bj):jN} is a countable base of M/G. Indeed, for open WM/G and q(x)W, choose Bj with xBjq1(W); then q(x)q(Bj)W, and q(Bj) is open by step 1.1. Thus the quotient is second countable.

step 1.1given
2.3

Let S be a slice from [F1] and put O=GS. The restriction qS:Sq(O) is bijective. It is a homeomorphism: it is continuous, while for open WS the saturation GW corresponds under the diffeomorphism G×SO to G×W, so it is open and q(W) is open by step 1.1. These homeomorphisms give M/G local Euclidean charts modelled on S, whose dimension is dimMdimG by the product diffeomorphism in [F1].

F1step 1.1
3.1

The slice charts are smoothly compatible. Near a point in the overlap of slices S and T, use the diffeomorphism G×TGT from [F1]. Its T-component, restricted to a neighborhood in S, is exactly the transition map (qT)1qS, and is smooth. They therefore define a smooth atlas. In the corresponding product coordinates G×S on M and slice coordinates S on M/G, the map q is (g,s)s, so it is a smooth surjective submersion.

F1step 2.3
4.1

Finally suppose two smooth structures on the same orbit space make q a smooth submersion. By [F5], relative to the first structure q has a smooth local section s near every quotient point. The identity from the first quotient manifold to the second is locally q2s, hence smooth; reversing the two structures proves that its inverse is smooth. Thus the structures coincide. Steps 2.1–3.1 prove existence, Hausdorffness, second countability, dimension, and submersivity, and this step proves uniqueness. Only finite local selections occur, so no choice principle is used.

F5step 2.1step 2.2step 2.3step 3.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

56 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources