Alphabeta Math
False statementConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-13
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Normal coordinates make the metric Euclidean throughout the chart

Statement

False claim: normal coordinates centred at a point make the Riemannian metric Euclidean at every point of their coordinate domain.

The library's current normal-coordinate interface assumes ACω; that background assumption is retained below and its exact use is identified, although the spherical calculation itself is explicit and choice-free.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The smooth sphere S2={q∈R3:q⋅q=1}, its round metric induced by the Euclidean dot product, the north pole N=(0,0,1), and the orthonormal basis e1=(1,0,0), e2=(0,1,0) of TNS2.

[A1]
[F1]

For F(q)=q⋅q, dFq(v)=2q⋅v is nonzero on S2. Thus A regular level set is an embedded submanifold makes it a smooth boundaryless surface and The tangent space of a regular level set is the kernel identifies TqS2=q⊥. Its inclusion is an immersion, so Pullback of a riemannian metric is riemannian exactly for immersions and Riemannian metric and riemannian manifold make the restricted Euclidean dot product its round Riemannian metric.

[F2]

Affine connection on a smooth manifold gives the connection axioms, Fundamental theorem of riemannian geometry characterizes the unique Levi--Civita connection, and Covariant derivative along a curve supplies differentiation along a curve.

[F3]

Under [A1], Existence uniqueness and smooth dependence of geodesics identifies a geodesic from its initial data, Existence of normal neighborhoods and Normal neighborhood and normal coordinate chart supply the normal chart, and Properties of normal coordinates at the center gives gij(N)=δij and ∂kgij(N)=0 at its centre.

Refutation

technique · direct
1.1F1F2givenalgebra

Differentiating the equation q⋅q=1 gives TqS2=q⊥, consistently with the round metric in [F1]. Put Pq(z)=z−(z⋅q)q. For smooth tangent vector fields X,Y:S2→R3, define ∇XY=P(dY(X)). The displayed formula is smooth and tangent-valued; pointwise linearity of P and the ordinary directional-derivative product rule give real linearity in Y, function linearity in X, and ∇X(fY)=X(f)Y+f∇XY. Thus [F2] makes ∇ an affine connection. Moreover, for tangent Y,Z, projection does not alter the dot product with either field, so the ordinary dot-product rule gives Xg(Y,Z)=g(∇XY,Z)+g(Y,∇XZ). Finally dY(X)−dX(Y)=[X,Y] is tangent, whence ∇XY−∇YX=[X,Y]. Thus the connection is metric compatible and torsion free, and uniqueness in [F2] identifies it with the round Levi--Civita connection.

2.1F2F3step 1.1algebra

For v∈TNS2 with r=∣v∣>0, put γv(t)=cos⁡(tr)N+sin⁡(tr)v/r. Then ∣γv(t)∣=1, γv(0)=N, γ˙v(0)=v, and γ¨v=−r2γv is normal to the sphere. Applying the along-curve definition in [F2] to the projected connection of step 1.1 gives Dtγ˙v=Pγv(γ¨v)=0, so γv is a geodesic. Its formula extends at v=0 by the constant curve, and uniqueness in [F3] yields exp⁡N(v)=cos⁡r N+(sin⁡r/r)v.

3.1F3F4step 2.1algebra

By [F3], restrict exp⁡N to a sufficiently small ball Bρ(0)⊆TNS2 on which it is a diffeomorphism, and use the supplied basis to form normal coordinates. Choose 0<r<min⁡{ρ,π/2} and set x=re1, w=e2. Since x⋅w=0, differentiating the formula of step 2.1 in the direction w gives d(exp⁡N)x(w)=(sin⁡r/r)e2. This vector is exactly the second coordinate vector at q=exp⁡N(x) because the inverse normal-coordinate chart is exp⁡N∘Ee. By [F4], sin⁡r>sin⁡0=0; and the mean value theorem gives c∈(0,r) with sin⁡r−sin⁡0=rcos⁡c. Strict decrease of cosine on [0,π] gives cos⁡c<cos⁡0=1, hence 0<sin⁡r<r. Therefore the second coordinate vector has squared round length g22(q)=(sin⁡rr)2<1.

4.1A1F3step 3.1∎

The metric coefficient in step 3.1 is not the Euclidean value 1, even though [F3] gives g22(N)=1 and vanishing first metric derivatives at the centre. This is the exact failure: normal coordinates normalize the metric's value and first derivatives at their centre, not its values throughout the chart. The witness is two-dimensional and uses an interior point with r>0; r=0 is precisely the normalized centre, while empty and zero-dimensional manifolds cannot supply this counterexample. Assumption [A1] is used only through the library interfaces collected in [F3]; every construction and calculation in steps 1.1--3.1 is explicit and makes no choice.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

60 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources