Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

At a conjugate endpoint the index form is degenerate

Statement

Assume exactly ACω through the declared dependencies.

(a) Let (M,g) be a finite-dimensional Riemannian manifold without boundary, let a<b, and let γ:[a,b]→M be an affinely parametrized geodesic. If γ(a) and γ(b) are conjugate along γ, then the fixed-endpoint index form on X0(γ) is degenerate: there is a nonzero J∈X0(γ) with Iγ(J,W)=0for every W∈X0(γ).

(b) On the round sphere SRn of radius R>0 with n≥2, let p∈SRn, let v∈TpSRn be a unit vector, and let γ(t)=exp⁡p(tv) on [0,πR]. Then γ(πR)=−p, the segment is a minimizing geodesic with d(p,−p)=L(γ)=πR, and it is not a strict local minimizer: for every ε>0 there is a piecewise C1 path σ from p to −p with σ≠γ, L(σ)=πR and sup⁡t∈[0,πR]d(σ(t),γ(t))<ε. The fixed-endpoint index form on [0,πR] is degenerate with nullspace exactly the space of Jacobi fields vanishing at both endpoints, of dimension n−1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The general geodesic segment of (a), and for (b) the radius R>0, the integer n≥2, the point p∈SRn, the unit vector v∈TpSRn, and the radial geodesic γ(t)=exp⁡p(tv).

[A1]

Countable choice is the assumption ACω of The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω). It is inherited through the index-form and Jacobi-field interfaces (Jacobi fields are the null solutions of the index form with fixed endpoints, Index form of a geodesic segment). The explicit trigonometric computations use no further choice and no full Axiom of Choice is assumed.

[F1]

The sphere SRn={x:∣x∣=R} is a nonempty regular level set, hence a smooth boundaryless n-manifold with TxSRn=x⊥; the induced metric is the restriction of the Euclidean inner product, the ambient Levi-Civita derivative is ordinary differentiation, and the induced connection is the tangential projection of the ambient derivative, equal to the Levi-Civita connection of the induced metric (A regular level set is an embedded submanifold, The tangent space of a regular level set is the kernel, Pullback of a riemannian metric is riemannian exactly for immersions, Riemannian metric and riemannian manifold, The Euclidean inner product ⟨x,y⟩=∑k<nxkyk on Rn, Fundamental theorem of riemannian geometry, Induced connection and second fundamental form, The induced connection is Levi–Civita). A smooth curve on SRn has Riemannian speed equal to the ambient norm of its velocity, since the two metrics coincide on tangent vectors, and an ambient acceleration orthogonal to the sphere has zero tangential projection. In Euclidean coordinates ordinary directional differentiation is metric compatible because the metric coefficients are constant and is torsion free because mixed partials commute; uniqueness in the cited fundamental theorem therefore identifies it with the ambient Levi–Civita connection.

[F2]

Initial data determine a unique maximal geodesic: a geodesic defined on an interval with γ(0)=p and γ′(0)=v is t↦exp⁡p(tv) there (Existence uniqueness and smooth dependence of geodesics, The exponential map scales geodesic time).

[F3]

A smooth variation through affinely parametrized geodesics has a Jacobi variation field (Variation field of a geodesic variation is a Jacobi field).

[F4]

A Jacobi field is uniquely determined by its initial value and initial covariant derivative (Existence and uniqueness of jacobi fields from initial data).

[F5]

Distance is the infimum of lengths of piecewise C1 joining paths, so a curve from p to q of length d(p,q) is minimizing and the length of any joining path is at least d(p,q); the length of a smooth curve is the integral of its Riemannian speed (Riemannian distance on a connected manifold, Riemannian speed and length).

[F6]

The points γ(a) and γ(b) are conjugate along γ exactly when some nonzero Jacobi field along the segment vanishes at both endpoints, and the multiplicity is the dimension of that space (Conjugate points along a geodesic and their multiplicity). The radical of the index form restricted to the continuous piecewise-C2 fixed-endpoint fields is exactly the set of smooth Jacobi fields vanishing at both endpoints (Jacobi fields are the null solutions of the index form with fixed endpoints, Index form of a geodesic segment).

[F8]

Sine and cosine satisfy sin⁡2x+cos⁡2x=1, with (sin⁡x)′=cos⁡x and (cos⁡x)′=−sin⁡x, and the chain rule applies; sin⁡0=0, cos⁡0=1, sin⁡π=0 and cos⁡π=−1 (Parity and the Pythagorean identity for sine and cosine, The derivatives of sine and cosine are cosine and minus sine, The chain rule, in one line from Carathéodory: if g is differentiable at c and f is differentiable at g(c), then f∘g is differentiable at c with (f∘g)′(c)=f′(g(c)) g′(c), Quarter-turn values and shifts by pi/2 and pi).

[F9]

If V is C2 and W is C1 on the pieces of a finite subdivision (with one-sided derivatives at piece endpoints), then Iγ(V,W)=[g(DtV,W)]ab−∑j=1m−1g(ΔjDtV,W(tj))−∑k=1m∫tk−1tkg(Dt2V+R(V,T)T,W) dt, and the jump sum is absent when V is smooth (Integration by parts for the index form). A Jacobi field satisfies Dt2J+R(J,T)T=0 (Jacobi field).

[F11]

The principal arccos⁡:[−1,1]→[0,π] is continuous and has derivative −1/1−y2 on (−1,1) (Principal inverse sine and inverse cosine, For −1<y<1, (arcsin⁡y)′=1/1−y2 and (arccos⁡y)′=−1/1−y2). Finite Gram--Schmidt supplies an orthonormal basis of a supplied finite-dimensional inner product space (Gram–Schmidt turns every finite independent list into an orthonormal list with the same successive spans).

Proof

Proof technique: read degeneracy off the vanishing Jacobi field, and on the sphere compare the radial geodesic with the family of meridians through the antipode.

1.1

For every unit u∈TpSRn the curve su(t)=cos⁡(t/R)p+Rsin⁡(t/R)u is a unit-speed geodesic of SRn, and in particular sv(t)=exp⁡p(tv) for all real t; consequently γ=sv∣[0,πR] and γ(πR)=−p. [F1, F2, F8, given] Since u⊥p and ∣u∣=1 with ∣p∣=R, the Pythagorean identity gives ∣su(t)∣2=R2cos⁡2(t/R)+R2sin⁡2(t/R)=R2, so su maps into SRn. The chain rule gives su′(t)=−(1/R)sin⁡(t/R)p+cos⁡(t/R)u and su′′(t)=−(1/R2)su(t); thus ∣su′∣2=sin⁡2(t/R)+cos⁡2(t/R)=1, and su′′ is a multiple of su, hence orthogonal to the sphere at su(t). By [F1] the tangential projection of the ambient acceleration is the covariant derivative of su′ along su, so su is a unit-speed geodesic. It satisfies su(0)=p and su′(0)=u, so by [F2] it equals the maximal geodesic exp⁡p(tu); at t=πR the values cos⁡π=−1 and sin⁡π=0 of [F8] give su(πR)=−p.

1.2

Part (a) holds. [F6, F9, given] If γ(a) and γ(b) are conjugate along γ, [F6] supplies a nonzero Jacobi field J along γ with J(a)=J(b)=0. A Jacobi field is smooth, hence a member of the index-form space, and its endpoint values place it in the fixed-endpoint subspace X0(γ). For W∈X0(γ) the integration-by-parts identity of [F9] applies with a smooth J and no derivative jumps; the integral vanishes pointwise because J is Jacobi, and the boundary term [g(DtJ,W)]ab vanishes because W(a)=W(b)=0. Hence Iγ(J,W)=0 for every W∈X0(γ), and Iγ is degenerate with the nonzero null vector J.

2.1

Let θ∈(0,π) and let w∈TpSRn be a unit vector with w⊥v; such a w exists because n≥2 makes p⊥∩v⊥ at least one-dimensional. Put uθ=cos⁡θ v+sin⁡θ w and sθ=suθ on [0,πR]. Then sθ is a unit-speed curve on SRn with sθ(0)=p and sθ(πR)=−p, its length is πR, and sθ≠γ. [F1, F5, F8, step 1.1, given] The vector uθ is a unit vector of TpSRn because v,w are orthonormal tangent vectors at p; step 1.1 therefore applies to sθ. The endpoints are sθ(0)=cos⁡0 p+0=p and sθ(πR)=cos⁡π p+Rsin⁡π uθ=−p by [F8]. Unit speed makes the length equal to the parameter length πR by [F5]. At the midpoint, sθ(πR/2)=cos⁡(π/2)p+Rsin⁡(π/2)uθ=Ruθ differs from sv(πR/2)=Rv for 0<θ<π, because uθ=cos⁡θ v+sin⁡θ w with sin⁡θ≠0 and w⊥v; hence sθ≠γ.

2.2

In the setting of (b), d(p,−p)=πR and γ is minimizing. [F1, F5, F7, F10, F11, step 1.1] For any piecewise C1 joining path σ, put q(t)=⟨p,σ(t)⟩/R2 and ϑ(t)=arccos⁡q(t)∈[0,π]. On an interval with 0<ϑ<π, ⟨σ,σ′⟩=0 and differentiation gives ∣ϑ′∣=∣⟨p−qσ,σ′⟩∣/(R21−q2)≤∣σ′∣/R by [F7], because ∣p−qσ∣=R1−q2. For 0<δ<π/2, let t+ be the first time ϑ=π−δ and t− the last time before t+ with ϑ=δ. Continuity, the endpoint values and compactness of the level sets supply these times, and δ≤ϑ≤π−δ on [t−,t+]. Thus ϑ is piecewise C1 on this subinterval by [F11]. Integrating the derivative bound piece by piece using [F10] gives L(σ)≥R(π−2δ). Letting δ↓0 yields L(σ)≥πR. By step 1.1, γ joins the poles with unit speed for time πR, so L(γ)=πR and the infimum in [F5] is attained by γ.

2.3

The fixed-endpoint index form on [0,πR] is degenerate, and its radical has dimension n−1. [F1, F3, F4, F6, F9, F10, F11, step 1.1, step 1.2] For each w∈TpSRn perpendicular to v, vary the initial direction through us=cos⁡s v+sin⁡s w when w is unit, scaling linearly for general w. Step 1.1 makes sus(t) a geodesic variation; its variation field is Jw(t)=Rsin⁡(t/R)w. By [F3] it is Jacobi, and it vanishes at 0 and πR. Its initial covariant derivative is w, so the n−1 independent choices of w∈v⊥∩TpSRn give independent endpoint-vanishing Jacobi fields. The tangent field tT(t) is also Jacobi by [F3], applied to the geodesic variation (s,t)↦γ((1+s)t); it vanishes at 0, has initial derivative v, and is nonzero at πR. By [F4], these n fields span all Jacobi fields with J(0)=0, because their initial derivatives form a basis of TpSRn. Their endpoint evaluation has one-dimensional image, generated by (πR)T(πR), so its kernel has dimension n−1. It remains to justify the radical on the full piecewise-C1 domain, rather than only the domain of [F6]. Choose an orthonormal basis e2,…,en of p⊥∩v⊥ by [F11]. Along γ, the frame E1=T, Ei=ei is orthonormal and parallel by [F1]: the constant ei have zero ambient derivative and T′ is normal. Write a radical field V in this frame as a continuous piecewise-C1 vector function x. Put Bij(t)=g(R(Ej,T)T,Ei), a smooth matrix. The definition in [F6] gives 0=I(V,W)=∫(⟨x′,y′⟩−⟨Bx,y⟩) dt for every endpoint-zero piecewise-C1 coefficient vector y. On any closed piece [c,d] of x, define H(t)=∫ctB(s)x(s) ds, h=x′+H and hˉ=(d−c)−1∫cdh. Take y(t)=∫ct(h(s)−hˉ) ds on [c,d] and zero outside. It is an admissible continuous piecewise-C1 test since y(c)=y(d)=0. By [F10], H′=Bx and integration by parts gives 0=∫cd⟨h,y′⟩=∫cd∣h−hˉ∣2. Therefore h=hˉ everywhere on [c,d], so x′=hˉ−H is C1, including one-sided endpoints. Hence V is piecewise C2. Since it annihilates every piecewise-C2 endpoint-zero test, [F6] makes it a smooth endpoint-vanishing Jacobi field. Conversely every such Jacobi field annihilates the entire piecewise-C1 space by [F9], exactly as in step 1.2. Thus the radical is precisely the already computed (n−1)-dimensional space.

3.1

For every t∈[0,πR] the distance between γ(t) and sθ(t) is at most Rθ. [F1, F5, F8, step 1.1, step 2.1] Fix t and define ρ(s)=cos⁡(t/R)p+Rsin⁡(t/R)(cos⁡s v+sin⁡s w) for s∈[0,θ]. Then ρ is smooth, ρ(s)∈SRn by the Pythagorean identity, ρ(0)=sv(t)=γ(t) and ρ(θ)=sθ(t). Its velocity is ρ′(s)=Rsin⁡(t/R)(−sin⁡s v+cos⁡s w), a tangent vector of ambient norm Rsin⁡(t/R)≤R, because v,w are orthonormal and orthogonal to p; by [F1] the Riemannian speed of ρ is that ambient norm. Hence L(ρ)≤Rθ by [F5], and since ρ joins γ(t) to sθ(t), the distance is at most L(ρ)≤Rθ. Taking the supremum over t gives sup⁡t∈[0,πR]d(γ(t),sθ(t))≤Rθ.

4.1

The geodesic γ of (b) is not a strict local minimizer. [step 2.1, step 2.2, step 3.1] Given ε>0, choose θ∈(0,π) with Rθ<ε and put σ=sθ. By step 2.1, σ is a piecewise C1 path from p to −p with σ≠γ and L(σ)=πR=L(γ), and by step 3.1 it satisfies sup⁡td(σ(t),γ(t))<ε. Thus every uniform neighborhood of γ contains a competitor of the same length, while step 2.2 shows that γ is minimizing; strict local minimality fails.

5.1

Boundary, degeneracy and choice audit. [A1, F6, step 1.2, step 2.1, step 2.3, step 4.1] The segment [a,b] of (a) is nondegenerate, and included endpoints use the one-sided conventions of the index-form and Jacobi-field definitions. In (a) the empty and zero-dimensional cases are vacuous because no conjugate pair exists, and in dimension one the vanishing space is zero by the multiplicity bound of [F6]. In (b), R>0 and n≥2; the case n=1 is excluded because the competitor construction needs a normal direction orthogonal to v, and on the circle the two semicircles are not arbitrarily close. The competitors sθ are distinct from γ and have exactly the same length, so no strict inequality of lengths is claimed at the conjugate endpoint; the open geodesic before πR is not addressed here. The vector w of step 2.1 is chosen once from the nonzero finite-dimensional space p⊥∩v⊥; no choice function on a family is used, and exactly the declared ACω is inherited through the index-form and Jacobi-field interfaces. The proposition asserts degeneracy and non-strictness; it claims no converse and does not say that every conjugate endpoint fails to minimize. □

Source locator

Lee, Riemannian Manifolds: An Introduction to Curvature, Chapter 10, printed pp.173–190, relates the index form to conjugate points; Datar, Lectures on Riemannian Geometry, §23.3, printed pp.165–169, records that the index form degenerates at a conjugate endpoint and that the sphere between antipodes is minimizing without being a strict minimizer. The explicit meridian family, the uniform closeness bound and the nullspace identification are computed above rather than quoted.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

150 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources