How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Integration by parts for the index form
Statement
Assume as carried by the supplied index-form definition (Index form of a geodesic segment, The Axiom of Countable Choice ()); the finite-piece calculation below requires no additional choice. Let be a Riemannian manifold, let , and let be an affinely parametrized geodesic of the Levi-Civita connection (Geodesic of an affine connection). Write . Fix a finite subdivision Let be continuous vector fields along , with of class and of class on each closed piece , using one-sided derivatives at each piece endpoint. For , define the derivative jump by Then Here The curvature convention and the piecewise-sum meaning of are those of Index form of a geodesic segment.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The nondegenerate segment, specified Levi-Civita geodesic, finite subdivision, and continuous fields with the stated piecewise regularity.
The countable-choice premise is (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). It is inherited through the declared Index form of a geodesic segment interface, whose stated use is the curvature pair-interchange symmetry needed for its symmetric index-form and second-variation assertions. The local finite-piece integration calculation below spends no further choice.
For continuous piecewise fields, the index form is the finite sum independent of the chosen common subdivision (Index form of a geodesic segment).
Covariant differentiation along each smooth piece is the pullback connection derivative, with one-sided traces at piece endpoints (Covariant derivative along a curve).
The Levi-Civita connection of is metric compatible (Levi civita connection).
In a local frame with connection matrix , a field with coefficient column satisfies (Local frame formula for covariant differentiation along a curve).
In a local frame with metric matrix , metric compatibility gives (Metric compatible connection on a riemannian vector bundle).
If is continuous on a compact interval, differentiable in its interior, and an integrable function agrees there with , then its integral is the endpoint difference of (Newton–Leibniz needs only continuity on , differentiability on , and a Riemann-integrable extension of the interior derivative).
Every continuous real function on a compact interval is Riemann integrable (A continuous function on is Riemann integrable, by Heine-Cantor and Riemann's criterion).
The Riemann integral is linear on integrable functions (Integrable functions on form a set closed under sums and scalar multiples, and ).
Curvature is linear in its vector-field slots, in particular (Curvature is C-infinity-linear in all three vector fields).
An affinely parametrized geodesic satisfies , with one-sided endpoint interpretation (Geodesic of an affine connection).
Proof
On one piece, choose a local frame and let be the coefficient columns of fields , with and as in [F4]–[F5]. Then . Differentiating this expression and using gives Apply this identity with . Since is and is on the piece, the function is continuous up to its one-sided endpoints and satisfies in the interior. The identity is local in , so no family of frames is selected.
On each piece, set The functions and extend continuously to that piece's endpoints, so they are integrable by [F7]. The index-form integrand from [F1] obeys by step 1.1 and bilinearity of . Integral linearity [F8] and Newton–Leibniz [F6] therefore give, on ,
Sum the identity of step 2.1 over the fixed finite subdivision. At an interior breakpoint , continuity of makes its two boundary contributions The two outer contributions are exactly . Substituting the piecewise-sum definition [F1] for the supplied geodesic [F10] proves the displayed formula. Since it equals the subdivision independent for every common subdivision, the right-hand expression is independent of the chosen one as well.
If , the outer endpoint term vanishes; with moving endpoints it must be retained. If , the covariant-derivative terms vanish and [F9] makes the curvature term zero; if , every term vanishes by bilinearity. The condition excludes a degenerate singleton interval, and all endpoint and breakpoint derivatives are one-sided. If is empty no supplied geodesic exists; in dimension zero all fields and both sides are zero. Dimension one requires no separate argument because no division by dimension or curvature symmetry is used in the local identity. The assumption [A1] is carried only through the declared index-form interface; this finite partition proof itself uses no countable selection and assumes no full Axiom of Choice. This is an equality, not an iff claim. [A1, F1, F2, F9, step 3.1]
Source locator
Lee, Riemannian Manifolds: An Introduction to Curvature, Chapter 10, Proposition 10.14 and proof, printed pp.187–188 / PDF labels P203–204, lines 7455–7498. Lee states the jump formula for proper normal fields, which vanish at the endpoints. The proof above derives the formula directly for continuous piecewise fields, so it also records the outer endpoint term.
Depends on
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- Covariant derivative along a curve
- Geodesic of an affine connection
- Index form of a geodesic segment
- Levi civita connection
- Metric compatible connection on a riemannian vector bundle
- Curvature is C-infinity-linear in all three vector fields
- Local frame formula for covariant differentiation along a curve
- A continuous function on $[a,b]$ is Riemann integrable, by Heine-Cantor and Riemann's criterion
- Integrable functions on $[a,b]$ form a set closed under sums and scalar multiples, and $\int_a^b(\lambda f+\mu g) = \lambda\int_a^b f + \mu\int_a^b g$
- Newton–Leibniz needs only continuity on $[a,b]$, differentiability on $(a,b)$, and a Riemann-integrable extension of the interior derivative
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
64 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John M. Lee, Riemannian Manifolds: An Introduction to Curvature (1997), Proposition 10.14 (standard reference, not scraped)