Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-sol)audited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Integration by parts for the index form

Statement

Assume ACω as carried by the supplied index-form definition (Index form of a geodesic segment, The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)); the finite-piece calculation below requires no additional choice. Let (M,g) be a Riemannian manifold, let a<b, and let γ:[a,b]→M be an affinely parametrized geodesic of the Levi-Civita connection (Geodesic of an affine connection). Write T:=γ˙. Fix a finite subdivision a=t0<t1<⋯<tm=b. Let V,W be continuous vector fields along γ, with V of class C2 and W of class C1 on each closed piece [tk−1,tk], using one-sided derivatives at each piece endpoint. For 1≤j<m, define the derivative jump by ΔjDtV:=DtV(tj+)−DtV(tj−). Then Iγ(V,W)=[g(DtV,W)]ab−∑j=1m−1g(ΔjDtV,W(tj))−∑k=1m∫tk−1tkg(Dt2V+R(V,T)T,W) dt. Here [g(DtV,W)]ab:=g(DtV(b−),W(b))−g(DtV(a+),W(a)). The curvature convention and the piecewise-sum meaning of Iγ are those of Index form of a geodesic segment.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The nondegenerate segment, specified Levi-Civita geodesic, finite subdivision, and continuous fields V,W with the stated piecewise regularity.

[A1]

The countable-choice premise is ACω (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). It is inherited through the declared Index form of a geodesic segment interface, whose stated use is the curvature pair-interchange symmetry needed for its symmetric index-form and second-variation assertions. The local finite-piece integration calculation below spends no further choice.

[F1]

For continuous piecewise C1 fields, the index form is the finite sum Iγ(V,W)=∑k=1m∫tk−1tk(g(DtV,DtW)−g(R(V,γ˙)γ˙,W)) dt, independent of the chosen common subdivision (Index form of a geodesic segment).

[F2]

Covariant differentiation along each smooth piece is the pullback connection derivative, with one-sided traces at piece endpoints (Covariant derivative along a curve).

[F3]

The Levi-Civita connection of g is metric compatible (Levi civita connection).

[F4]

In a local frame e with connection matrix B(t)=ωγ(t)(γ˙(t)), a field with coefficient column u(t) satisfies Dt(eu)=e(u′+Bu) (Local frame formula for covariant differentiation along a curve).

[F5]

In a local frame with metric matrix H(t), metric compatibility gives H′=BTH+HB (Metric compatible connection on a riemannian vector bundle).

[F6]

If G is continuous on a compact interval, differentiable in its interior, and an integrable function agrees there with G′, then its integral is the endpoint difference of G (Newton–Leibniz needs only continuity on [a,b], differentiability on (a,b), and a Riemann-integrable extension of the interior derivative).

[F7]

Every continuous real function on a compact interval is Riemann integrable (A continuous function on [a,b] is Riemann integrable, by Heine-Cantor and Riemann's criterion).

[F9]

Curvature is linear in its vector-field slots, in particular R(0,T)T=0 (Curvature is C-infinity-linear in all three vector fields).

[F10]

An affinely parametrized geodesic satisfies Dtγ˙=0, with one-sided endpoint interpretation (Geodesic of an affine connection).

Proof

technique · Differentiate the metric pairing on each smooth piece, apply Newton–Leibniz, then telescope the finite boundary sum
1.1F2F3F4F5

On one piece, choose a local frame and let u,w be the coefficient columns of fields U,W, with H and B as in [F4]–[F5]. Then g(U,W)=uTHw. Differentiating this expression and using H′=BTH+HB gives ddtg(U,W)=g(DtU,W)+g(U,DtW). Apply this identity with U=DtV. Since V is C2 and W is C1 on the piece, the function G(t):=g(DtV,W) is continuous up to its one-sided endpoints and satisfies G′=g(Dt2V,W)+g(DtV,DtW) in the interior. The identity is local in t, so no family of frames is selected.

2.1F1F6F7F8step 1.1

On each piece, set Q(t):=g(Dt2V+R(V,γ˙)γ˙,W). The functions Q and G′ extend continuously to that piece's endpoints, so they are integrable by [F7]. The index-form integrand from [F1] obeys g(DtV,DtW)−g(R(V,γ˙)γ˙,W)=G′(t)−Q(t) by step 1.1 and bilinearity of g. Integral linearity [F8] and Newton–Leibniz [F6] therefore give, on [tk−1,tk], ∫tk−1tk(g(DtV,DtW)−g(R(V,γ˙)γ˙,W)) dt=g(DtV(tk−),W(tk))−g(DtV(tk−1+),W(tk−1))−∫tk−1tkQ(t) dt.

3.1F1F2F10step 2.1

Sum the identity of step 2.1 over the fixed finite subdivision. At an interior breakpoint tj, continuity of W makes its two boundary contributions g(DtV(tj−),W(tj))−g(DtV(tj+),W(tj))=−g(ΔjDtV,W(tj)). The two outer contributions are exactly g(DtV(b−),W(b))−g(DtV(a+),W(a)). Substituting the piecewise-sum definition [F1] for the supplied geodesic [F10] proves the displayed formula. Since it equals the subdivision independent Iγ(V,W) for every common subdivision, the right-hand expression is independent of the chosen one as well.

4.1

If W(a)=W(b)=0, the outer endpoint term vanishes; with moving endpoints it must be retained. If V=0, the covariant-derivative terms vanish and [F9] makes the curvature term zero; if W=0, every term vanishes by bilinearity. The condition a<b excludes a degenerate singleton interval, and all endpoint and breakpoint derivatives are one-sided. If M is empty no supplied geodesic exists; in dimension zero all fields and both sides are zero. Dimension one requires no separate argument because no division by dimension or curvature symmetry is used in the local identity. The assumption [A1] is carried only through the declared index-form interface; this finite partition proof itself uses no countable selection and assumes no full Axiom of Choice. This is an equality, not an iff claim. [A1, F1, F2, F9, step 3.1] □

Source locator

Lee, Riemannian Manifolds: An Introduction to Curvature, Chapter 10, Proposition 10.14 and proof, printed pp.187–188 / PDF labels P203–204, lines 7455–7498. Lee states the jump formula for proper normal fields, which vanish at the endpoints. The proof above derives the formula directly for continuous piecewise C2/C1 fields, so it also records the outer endpoint term.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

64 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources