How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Jacobi field
Definition
Let be a Riemannian manifold, let be a nondegenerate interval, and let be an affinely parametrized geodesic. For a smooth vector field along , write for its covariant derivative along and , using Covariant derivative along a curve. The curvature operator has the convention as fixed by Covariant derivatives commute up to curvature in a two parameter variation and used in Riemann curvature four-tensor. A smooth field is a Jacobi field along when it satisfies the Jacobi equation throughout . We write for the set of these fields.
The interval is required to have nonempty interior so that the covariant derivatives are defined; if an endpoint is included, the equation there uses the one-sided derivatives of the smooth field. Constant geodesics are included: when , the curvature term vanishes and the equation is . On a zero-dimensional manifold the only field is zero, so the equation holds. In dimension one the same equation and curvature convention apply without a separate restriction. The definition classifies a specified field and geodesic and makes no existence choice.
Depends on
Used by
- Polar integration may discard the cut locus Corollary
- The space of Jacobi fields along a geodesic has dimension two n Corollary
- A cut point that is not conjugate because two minimizers arrive Counterexample
- Conjugate points along a geodesic and their multiplicity Definition
- Conjugate antipodes on the round sphere Example
- Index form in constant curvature Example
- Jacobi fields in constant sectional curvature Example
- Jacobi fields in euclidean space Example
- No conjugate points in nonpositive constant curvature Example
- A geodesic stops minimizing exactly at its first conjugate point False statement
- Every vector field along a geodesic is a Jacobi field False statement
- Local length comparison for a conjugate-free geodesic Lemma
- Wronskian of two jacobi fields is constant Lemma
- At a conjugate endpoint the index form is degenerate Proposition
- Conjugate instants are isolated unless the geodesic is constant Proposition
- Conjugate points and multiplicity are invariant under affine reparametrization Proposition
- Hessian of distance in terms of radial jacobi fields Proposition
- Jacobi fields are the null solutions of the index form with fixed endpoints Proposition
- Tangential jacobi fields are affine multiples of the velocity Proposition
- A geodesic does not minimize past its first conjugate point Theorem
- Conjugate points are critical values of the exponential map along the geodesic Theorem
- Existence and uniqueness of jacobi fields from initial data Theorem
- Index lemma Theorem
- Variation field of a geodesic variation is a Jacobi field Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
11 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John M. Lee, Riemannian Manifolds: An Introduction to Curvature (1997), Chapter 10 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Ved Datar, Lectures on Riemannian Geometry (2025), Definition 21.2.3 (standard reference, not scraped)