Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Induced connection and second fundamental form

Definition

Assume ACω. Let MM be an embedded Riemannian submanifold, let be the Levi–Civita connection of the ambient metric, and let X,YΓ(TM). Around each pM, extend X and Y locally to ambient fields X~ and Y~ using a slice chart, and define the ambient derivative along M by

XYp:=(X~Y~)p.

This value is independent of both extensions. Indeed, an alternative first extension differs at p by a vector that is zero, so function-linearity in the differentiating slot gives no change. If an alternative second extension differs by W=afaa with WM=0, then every faM=0 and tangency of Xp gives Xp(fa)=0. The connection laws therefore give

(X~W)p=aXp(fa)ap+afa(p)(X~a)p=0.

The same local calculation shows that these values vary smoothly along M. No simultaneous or global choice of extensions is used.

Using the smooth projections of Tangential and normal projections along a Riemannian submanifold, define the induced connection and the second fundamental form by

XMY:=(XY),II(X,Y):=(XY).

Thus the orthogonal splitting gives the Gauss decomposition

XY=XMY+II(X,Y).

The assumption ACω is inherited exactly from the preceding smooth restricted-bundle and projection construction. The local extension and independence calculation above adds no choice. The formulas are valid for the empty submanifold, in tangent or normal rank zero, in rank one, and at boundary points; positive definiteness of the Riemannian metric excludes a degenerate orthogonal splitting. The following items prove that M is the intrinsic Levi–Civita connection and that II is a symmetric νM-valued tensor.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources