How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Induced connection and second fundamental form
Definition
Assume . Let be an embedded Riemannian submanifold, let be the Levi–Civita connection of the ambient metric, and let . Around each , extend and locally to ambient fields and using a slice chart, and define the ambient derivative along by
This value is independent of both extensions. Indeed, an alternative first extension differs at by a vector that is zero, so function-linearity in the differentiating slot gives no change. If an alternative second extension differs by with , then every and tangency of gives . The connection laws therefore give
The same local calculation shows that these values vary smoothly along . No simultaneous or global choice of extensions is used.
Using the smooth projections of Tangential and normal projections along a Riemannian submanifold, define the induced connection and the second fundamental form by
Thus the orthogonal splitting gives the Gauss decomposition
The assumption is inherited exactly from the preceding smooth restricted-bundle and projection construction. The local extension and independence calculation above adds no choice. The formulas are valid for the empty submanifold, in tangent or normal rank zero, in rank one, and at boundary points; positive definiteness of the Riemannian metric excludes a degenerate orthogonal splitting. The following items prove that is the intrinsic Levi–Civita connection and that is a symmetric -valued tensor.
Depends on
Used by
- The same intrinsic planar strip can have different extrinsic curvature after bending Counterexample
- Normal connection Definition
- Totally geodesic submanifold Definition
- The catenoid has zero mean curvature but is not totally geodesic Example
- The second fundamental form is intrinsic to the abstract Riemannian manifold False statement
- Zero mean curvature implies a submanifold is totally geodesic False statement
- The second fundamental form is a symmetric normal-bundle-valued two-tensor Lemma
- Codazzi equation for a Riemannian submanifold Theorem
- Equivalent characterizations of a totally geodesic submanifold Theorem
- Gauss equation for a Riemannian submanifold Theorem
- The induced connection is Levi–Civita Theorem
- Weingarten equation and adjointness of the shape operator Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Chuu-Lian Terng, Lecture Notes on Curves and Surfaces in R^3 and Riemannian Geometry (standard reference, not scraped)
- Ved Datar, Lectures on Riemannian Geometry (standard reference, not scraped)
- John M. Lee, Riemannian Manifolds: An Introduction to Curvature (standard reference, not scraped)