Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Gauss equation for a Riemannian submanifold

Statement

Assume ACω. For tangent fields X,Y,Z,W along an embedded Riemannian submanifold MM,

RmM(X,Y,Z,W)=RmM(X,Y,Z,W)+g(II(X,W),II(Y,Z))g(II(X,Z),II(Y,W)).

The curvature sign convention is R(X,Y)Z=XYZYXZ[X,Y]Z. The choice hypothesis is inherited exactly through the smooth submanifold projection constructions.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable choice, the embedded Riemannian submanifold, and tangent fields X,Y,Z,W.

[F1]

The Gauss decomposition is XY=XMY+II(X,Y). Induced connection and second fundamental form.

[F2]

The induced connection is the Levi–Civita connection of the induced metric. The induced connection is Levi–Civita.

[F3]

For every normal field ν, (Xν)=SνX and g(SνX,W)=g(II(X,W),ν). Weingarten equation and adjointness of the shape operator.

[F4]

Curvature is the bracket-corrected covariant-derivative commutator with the stated sign. Curvature of an affine connection.

[F5]

The Riemann four-tensor pairs curvature with the metric: Rm(X,Y,Z,W)=g(R(X,Y)Z,W). Riemann curvature four-tensor.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Apply [F1] to the tangent field YMZ and [F3] to the normal field II(Y,Z). Taking tangential components gives (XYZ)=XMYMZSII(Y,Z)X. Interchanging X,Y gives the analogous formula, and [F1] gives ([X,Y]Z)=[X,Y]MZ.

F1F3algebra
2.1

Substitute the three identities of step 1.1 into the curvature commutator [F4]. Since [F2] identifies the intrinsic connection, (R(X,Y)Z)=RM(X,Y)ZSII(Y,Z)X+SII(X,Z)Y.

F2F4step 1.1algebra
3.1

Pair step 2.1 with W. The normal component of R(X,Y)Z is orthogonal to W, and [F3] converts the two shape terms, so [F5] yields RmM(X,Y,Z,W)=RmM(X,Y,Z,W)g(II(X,W),II(Y,Z))+g(II(Y,W),II(X,Z)). Metric symmetry and rearrangement give exactly the formula in the Statement.

F3F5step 2.1algebra
4.1

The equation is vacuous on the empty submanifold. If tangent rank is zero every term vanishes. In tangent rank one the alternating curvature terms vanish, while the two quadratic terms are equal and therefore cancel; the second fundamental form itself need not vanish. If normal rank is zero the two II terms vanish and the identity reduces to equality of ambient and intrinsic tangent curvature. The pointwise calculation applies at boundary points, and positive definiteness supplies the orthogonal projections. The stated ACω is inherited through [F1]–[F3]; no new choice is made.

F1F2F3F5step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources