Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Euclidean formal immersions are homotopy equivalent to Stiefel-bundle sections

Statement

Let Mm be a smooth manifold and n≥m. Supply its canonical smooth tangent bundle and smooth global differential, and fix a smooth Riemannian metric on TM. These smooth constructions and such a metric exist under ACω; the conclusions below require no additional choice once they are supplied. Give εn=M×Rn its Euclidean metric. Distinguish the monomorphism bundle M=Mono⁡(TM,εn) from its orthonormal Stiefel subbundle E=V(TM,εn), whose fibre is Vm(Rn), associated to the orthonormal frame bundle of TM. All section spaces carry the weak compact-open C∞ topology. Then:

  1. Smooth bundle monomorphisms B:TM→εn over the identity correspond homeomorphically to Γ(M). Fibrewise polar normalization B↦B(B∗B)−1/2 gives an O(m)-equivariant strong deformation retraction Γ(M)→Γ(E). In an orthonormal frame, the polar map is a diffeomorphism Mono⁡(Rm,Rn)≅Vm(Rn)×Sym⁡m+, where the second factor consists of positive-definite self-adjoint m×m matrices; thus the monomorphism fibre and the Stiefel fibre have the same homotopy type, rather than being identified homeomorphically.
  2. The canonical target tangent trivialization gives the actual homeomorphism FImm⁡(M,Rn)≅C∞(M,Rn)×Γ(M). Contracting the first factor and polar-normalizing the second give a homotopy equivalence FImm⁡(M,Rn)≃Γ(E). In particular the two spaces have the same path components and homotopy invariants. Under the actual homeomorphism, the derivative map is f↦(f,df); in the normalized model it sends df to its polar normalization.
  3. For the standard metric on Sm, the bundle E=V(TSm,εn) is the pullback along x↦TxSm∈Grm(Rm+1) of the bundle of isometric injections from the tautological m-plane to Rn. Whenever TM is trivial, E is trivial; in particular V(TS1,ε2)≅S1×S1.

No orientation of M or global tangent frame is needed. The normalization uses the supplied metric; the canonical smooth tangent constructions and metric existence for general M are the stated countable-choice uses. The section-space maps use no further choice once those data are supplied.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A smooth manifold Mm with a supplied smooth tangent metric, n≥m, the trivial Euclidean bundle εn, the monomorphism bundle M, and the orthonormal Stiefel subbundle E.

[F1]

In a local tangent frame, a fibrewise injection is a full-rank matrix, and changes of tangent frame act by right multiplication; these matrices represent the formal Gauss data. Gauss frame map of an immersion into Euclidean space

[F2]

A formal immersion (f,F) is a smooth map f and a smooth bundle monomorphism covering f; the formal immersion spaces and smooth mapping spaces have the weak compact-open C∞ topology, generated by finitely many compact chart pieces and derivative bounds. Formal immersion between smooth manifolds, Space of immersions and space of formal immersions, The weak compact-open C-infinity topology on mapping spaces

[F3]

A smooth section is a smooth map into the bundle whose projection is the identity. Smooth sections, local sections, and support

[F4]

A bundle map over the identity restricts to a linear map on each fibre; smoothness is checked in local bundle charts. Vector bundle maps over a smooth base map, Smooth vector bundles, rank, fibres, and trivial bundles

[F5]

A locally trivial fibre bundle has local product charts. Locally trivial fiber bundle

[F6]

Vm(Rn) consists of ordered orthonormal frames; the Grassmannian has graph charts, and its tautological bundle has fibre the represented plane. Stiefel spaces, Grassmannians, and tautological bundles

[F7]

The orthonormal frame bundle, using the supplied metric, is a principal O(m)-bundle; its associated bundles use the given group action. Frame bundles and associated vector bundles

[F8]

For a regular level set its tangent space is the kernel of the differential. The tangent space of a regular level set is the kernel

[F9]

A smooth vector bundle is trivial if and only if it admits a smooth global frame. A vector bundle is trivial if and only if it has a global frame

[F10]

Under countable choice every smooth manifold admits a Riemannian metric. Every smooth manifold admits a riemannian metric, The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)

[F11]

A smooth positive-definite self-adjoint bundle endomorphism has a unique smooth positive square root. Locally, the derivative of matrix squaring at a positive matrix R is H↦RH+HR; its eigenvalues on symmetric matrices are ri+rj>0, so the root is smooth in the matrix entries. Positive-definite bundle endomorphisms have smooth positive square roots

[F12]

Under ACω, the canonical tangent-bundle atlas gives smooth local product charts linear on each fibre, and the global differential of a smooth map is smooth. Assuming countable choice, the tangent bundle has a canonical smooth 2n-manifold structure, Assuming countable choice, the global differential of a smooth map is smooth. These structures are supplied here.

Proof

1.1F1F2F3F4F5F6F7F10F12construct

Use the supplied smooth tangent-bundle structures of [F12] and the supplied metric; [F10] supplies one under ACω if needed. In any local tangent frame the condition that a matrix have rank m is open, so [F1] and [F4] give the smooth monomorphism bundle M. Orthonormal tangent frames give the associated bundle with fibre Vm(Rn) in [F6] and [F7], which is exactly its isometric-injection subbundle E. The map B↦(x↦Bx) is a bijection onto Γ(M) by [F3]. It is a homeomorphism: section coordinates are precisely the matrix coefficients on each compact base chart piece. A compact piece of TM has compact base projection and bounded vector coordinates, so controlling coefficient jets there controls every jet of the fibre-linear total-space map. Conversely evaluating that map along the finitely many local basis-vector sections over a compact base piece recovers each coefficient and all its derivatives. These two estimates show that the weak total-space and coefficient topologies agree with the section topology in [F2].

2.1F2F6F7F11step 1.1algebra

For an injective B put R=(B∗B)1/2 and Q=BR−1. By [F11] these operations are smooth, and Q∗Q=I. Conversely (Q,R) with Q isometric and R positive gives B=QR, uniquely, so this is the asserted local polar diffeomorphism. Under a change of orthonormal tangent frame U∈O(m), B changes to BU, R to U∗RU, and Q to QU; hence it descends globally without a global frame. The path Bt=B((1−t)I+tR−1) remains injective because its second factor is positive definite, has B0=B and B1=Q, and fixes every isometric B. The operations and this path are continuous for weak C∞ section topologies: on finitely many compact chart pieces the positive spectra stay bounded away from zero, and the smooth matrix operations and all chain-rule derivatives vary continuously there. Thus it is an equivariant strong deformation retraction of section spaces. Rank zero gives the unique empty matrix and the same formulas.

3.1F2F4F12step 1.1step 2.1construct

The canonical identification TRn≅Rn×Rn sends a formal immersion (f,F) to (f,B) with Bx:TxM→Rn the same fibre map. This is a bijection onto C∞(M,Rn)×Γ(M) and a homeomorphism for the identical local matrix/derivative neighbourhoods, as in step 1.1. The contraction (f,B)↦((1−t)f,B) deforms the first factor to zero; combining it with step 2.1 on the second factor gives the homotopy equivalence to Γ(E). Its homotopy inverse sends an isometric section Q to (0,Q). For an immersion the smooth formal pair is (f,df) by [F2] and [F12], so the normalized section is the polar part of df, as stated. No compactness of M is needed because every basic neighbourhood controls only finitely many compact chart pieces.

4.1F6F7F8F9step 2.1step 3.1∎

If TM has a smooth global frame by [F9], orthonormalizing it in the supplied metric gives a global orthonormal frame and identifies E with M×Vm(Rn). For M=Sm with its standard metric, [F8] gives TxSm=x⊥; its projection I−xx∗ varies smoothly, so the Gauss map to the Grassmannian is smooth in its graph charts. The tautological-plane pullback of [F6] therefore is TSm, and its isometric-injection bundle pulls back to E. On S1 the standard unit angular field is a global orthonormal frame, giving E≅S1×V1(R2)=S1×S1. When m=0 the Stiefel and monomorphism fibres are points, and when n=m the normalized fibre is O(m) while the monomorphism fibre retains its positive-definite polar factor. These are included in the same construction.

Depends on

Used by

Cited to discharge well-definedness by Gauss frame map of an immersion into Euclidean space.

Dependency tree · two levels

64 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources