How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A regular level identifies unparametrized trajectories
Statement
Let and suppose that is a regular value. Each class in has exactly one representative whose value at lies in . Thus evaluation induces a bijection
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A Morse trajectory from to and a regular strictly between its endpoint values.
Along a nonconstant trajectory, (Downward gradient-like vector fields for a Morse function).
A regular level is an embedded hypersurface (A regular level set is an embedded submanifold).
Proof
Continuity and the endpoint limits give a time with ; strict decrease in [F1] makes unique. Translating by therefore gives exactly one representative in the stated slice.
Conversely, two slice representatives in one time orbit differ by a translation, and step 1.1 forces that translation to be zero. The slice lies in the embedded hypersurface of [F2], giving the asserted identification.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Michèle Audin and Mihai Damian, Morse Theory and Floer Homology, Remark 2.2.3 (standard reference, not scraped)