How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Outside a null set every translation makes a chosen value a transverse zero
Statement
Let be smooth and let . Then outside a null subset of , the map has as a regular value.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A smooth map and a point .
For the point submanifold , generic translations are transverse to it outside a null set (Generic translations of a Euclidean-valued map are transverse).
Transversality to a point is the regular-value condition (Transversality to a point is the regular-value condition).
Proof
Apply [L1] with . Then outside a null subset of , the translated map is transverse to .
By [L2], is equivalent to being a regular value of .
Therefore outside a null set of translations, the chosen value becomes a transverse zero.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Marco Gualtieri, Topology I: Smooth Manifolds, cumulative notes (standard reference, not scraped)