How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Jordan–Brouwer separation
Statement
Assume AC. For , the image of a topological embedding has exactly two complementary path components, and is the common boundary of both.
For an embedding with , there are exactly two complementary components, one bounded and one unbounded, again with common boundary . In the exceptional case , an embedded in consists of two points and has three complementary components , one bounded and two unbounded. No assertion that a component closure is a ball is made. AC is inherited only from Alexander duality.
Facts & Assumptions
Alexander duality for compact locally contractible subsets of a sphere gives the natural reduced homology/cohomology isomorphism for a nonempty proper compact weakly locally contractible subset.
Zero-th singular homology is free on path components identifies integral with the free group on path components; the augmentation is the sum of coefficients on this basis.
Homology of spheres gives and for , using the separate calculation when .
Homotopic maps induce equal maps in singular cohomology and Singular cohomology is contravariantly functorial give homotopy invariance and homeomorphism invariance of integral cohomology.
The Axiom of Choice is assumed for the exact uses inherited through [F1].
A real-valued continuous map on a connected space has order-convex image, so it takes every value between any two of its values gives intermediate values on a continuous real-valued path, including the connected interval case.
Proof
Given: An embedding , . By embedding we mean a homeomorphism onto its image.
The image is compact and weakly locally contractible, since the sphere is compact and has locally contractible coordinate balls; is discrete. It is proper: otherwise would be a homeomorphism from to , contradicting the different degree- homology groups in [F3]. A homeomorphism and its inverse induce mutually inverse chain maps, hence isomorphisms on homology, so that contradiction does not assume invariance of domain. Let be the standard equator . Its two complementary hemispheres are each homeomorphic to an open -ball, by projection to the first coordinates and the two graphs . They are path connected, disjoint, and relatively open and closed in the complement. Thus [F2] gives . Applying [F1] to this explicit equator computes , including . Transport by using [F4], then apply [F1] to , to obtain .
A nonempty space with reduced equal to has exactly two path components here. To see this directly from [F2], choose one component . The augmentation kernel is freely generated by for : subtracting the total coefficient at gives the spanning formula, and comparison of the other coefficients proves independence. There must be at least one such generator because the kernel is nonzero. There cannot be two: their images under an isomorphism to would be nonzero integers , and the nonzero relation would map to zero, contradicting injectivity. Hence step 1.1 gives precisely two path components . They are open in the sphere: every point of its open complement has a small path-connected coordinate ball lying in that complement, and this ball is contained in the point's path component. A connected subset cannot meet two members of this open partition, so these path components are also the connected components. Each is closed relative to the complement, whence its sphere boundary is contained in .
We will also use that the complement of any embedded nonempty closed disk contained in is path connected. Such an is compact, proper and weakly locally contractible, including its boundary (small convex relative neighborhoods contract in the disk). The disk contracts linearly to a point. A point has one singular cochain generator in each nonnegative degree; its positive coboundaries alternate between zero and identity because the alternating face sum is zero or one. Thus its cohomology is in degree zero and zero otherwise, and its reduced cohomology is zero in every degree. By [F4], the same is true of . Alexander duality [F1] gives . This complement is nonempty because , and [F2]'s basis-difference description shows it has exactly one path component.
Suppose were not in the closure of . Choose an open sphere neighborhood of disjoint from . In the domain sphere choose a small open spherical cap around whose image lies in ; its complement is a closed -disk. For choose the singleton cap, leaving the other point. In positive domain dimension, a rotation puts the cap at the north pole, and projection or stereographic coordinates identifies its complementary closed cap with a closed disk. Set . By step 2.2 the space is connected. But is open in it, is nonempty, and is closed in it: its boundary in lies in by step 2.1 and cannot meet , so is contained in . Its complement contains and is nonempty. This is a separation, a contradiction. Therefore every point of lies in the closure of ; the same proof applies to . Together with step 2.1 this gives .
For the Euclidean version, start with a separate embedding and write . Let and identify with by Direct substitution gives both inverse identities and norm one, while the denominators are nonzero on their domains, so these are continuous mutual inverses. The composite is a spherical embedding with image ; by construction avoids . Apply steps 1.1–3.1 to this embedding, and denote by the component of containing , and by the other. If , deleting from leaves a path-connected space. For two remaining points, start with a path between them in . Choose a small closed coordinate ball about contained in and avoiding the endpoints. If the path meets a still smaller closed concentric ball, let the first and last meeting times be the minimum and maximum of its closed preimage. Both meeting points are on that smaller ball's sphere, since the endpoints are outside it. Replace the intervening path segment by a path on that sphere. This sphere is path connected for : normalized straight segments join non-antipodal points, and for antipodal points insert a third unit vector not on their line. The replacement avoids ; the portions before the first and after the last meeting also avoid it. If there were no meeting, use the original path. This proves the assertion. Under , the two Euclidean complementary components are and .
The component contains a neighborhood of , whose stereographic image contains all points of sufficiently large norm: this follows directly from the inverse formula in step 4.1, whose last coordinate tends to as the norm tends to infinity. Thus is unbounded. The other component lies outside this neighborhood and its stereographic image is bounded by the same formula. The sphere boundaries of both components are by step 3.1. Since avoids , the homeomorphism sends their finite-point boundaries to . For , order the two Euclidean image points as . A continuous path in the line cannot cross either missing point, by [F6], and each of the three indicated intervals is convex and therefore path connected. These are exactly the three Euclidean components. The middle interval has boundary ; the outer intervals have boundaries and respectively. In the sphere they join through infinity, as consistent with the spherical statement.
This proves all the asserted cases. An embedding has nonempty image, and properness was proved in step 1.1 rather than assumed. The coefficient group used for counting is , so the zero coefficient ring cannot conceal the number of components. The case is explicitly separated where punctured coordinate spheres cease to be path connected; is outside this theorem's statement. No smoothness, local flatness or ball-closure conclusion was used. Homology computations retain degenerate simplices. The only AC use is [F5]'s inherited duality assumption; the component count, finite cap choice and single-path detour use no additional choice.
Depends on
- Alexander duality for compact locally contractible subsets of a sphere
- Zero-th singular homology is free on path components
- Homology of spheres
- The Axiom of Choice
- Homotopic maps induce equal maps in singular cohomology
- Singular cohomology is contravariantly functorial
- A real-valued continuous map on a connected space has order-convex image, so it takes every value between any two of its values
Used by
- A horned sphere has complementary components that need not be balls Counterexample
- Invariance of domain Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
39 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Hatcher, Algebraic Topology, Proposition 2B.1, pp.169–171 (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. J. Walton, Algebraic Topology IV, Theorem 4.7.3, pp.95–98 (standard reference, not scraped)