How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Homology of spheres
Statement
For , is for and otherwise. For , and all other reduced groups vanish. Thus for , whereas .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The boundary of an -simplex as a simplicial model of .
Proof
Put and . The integral augmented complex of has a vertex-cone contraction, as used in A simplex has zero reduced simplicial homology. Tensoring the contraction identity with preserves it, so the augmented complex with coefficients in is exact. For , its groups and differentials computing reduced homology in degree agree with those of , hence .
In degree , exactness for gives . The map sends to the alternating sum of its facets with coefficient ; it is injective since any one facet has coefficient or . There are no -chains in , so . This uses the augmentation as when . Above degree all simplicial groups vanish.
The boundary of the single simplex is finite, so choose an order on its finite vertex set. The characteristic-simplex comparison of Simplicial and singular homology agree sends each vertex with coefficient to the corresponding singular point with coefficient ; its homology map is independent of this order and commutes with augmentation to . For either theory, , directly from the kernel-in-degree-zero definition in Augmentation at 0-simplices and reduced singular homology. Thus the ordinary comparison isomorphism restricts to an isomorphism on these kernels; in positive degrees reduced and ordinary homology agree. The calculation therefore transfers to , and negative reduced groups are zero by convention.
For , the augmentation is surjective (use any vertex) with zero kernel, hence is an isomorphism. For , the simplicial model consists of two vertices and no edges, giving ; its augmentation kernel is . This includes .
Depends on
Used by
- A nowhere-zero section forces the Euler data to vanish Corollary
- A homology equivalence need not be a homotopy equivalence without simple connectivity Counterexample
- A vanishing Lefschetz number with canceling fixed points Counterexample
- Degree is not defined by top homology for self maps of s zero Counterexample
- Euler equality alone does not imply perfectness Counterexample
- Leray–Hirsch fails without a global restricting fiber basis Counterexample
- Middle-dimensional surgery can change an intersection form Counterexample
- The UCT splitting is not natural Counterexample
- Top squares do not determine lower squares Counterexample
- Zero Euler class does not in general imply a nowhere-zero section Counterexample
- Zero Lefschetz number does not imply absence of fixed points Counterexample
- Absolute and relative Hurewicz homomorphisms Definition
- Degree of a self map of an oriented sphere Definition
- A created cancelling pair contributes a (1+t)tᵏ term Example
- A degenerate isolated fixed point with nonzero local index Example
- A nowhere-zero vector field on an odd sphere Example
- A proper singular curve with weight-zero cohomology Example
- Cap product on the oriented circle Example
- Cohomology of lens spaces from UCT Example
- Degree-d self-maps of a sphere have Lefschetz number 1+(-1)ⁿ d Example
- First nonzero homotopy group of a sphere Example
- Fundamental classes and duality for spheres and tori Example
- Homology of a product of spheres by Kunneth Example
- Homology of the loop space of an odd sphere Example
- Integral cohomology ring of a torus Example
- Kronecker pairing for a cellular circle generator Example
- Mayer–Vietoris computation of first homology of the torus Example
- Path-loop Serre computation of CP infinity Example
- Poincaré–Lefschetz duality for a disk Example
- Proper Cech descent does not require acyclic fibers Example
- Relative homology of a disk and its boundary Example
- Rotations of the two-sphere and their Lefschetz number Example
- Serre spectral sequence of the complex Hopf fibration Example
- Serre spectral sequence of the quaternionic Hopf fibration Example
- The hairy-ball theorem for even spheres Example
- The height function on a sphere is perfect Example
- The punctured line has a weight-two logarithmic class Example
- The rational Hurewicz range for the four-sphere Example
- The signature of the product of two 2-spheres is zero: the hyperbolic intersection form Example
- A closed three-manifold with H₁ = Z/2 and H₂ = 0 does not embed in S⁴ Lemma
…and 28 more results.
Dependency tree · two levels
18 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Allen Hatcher, Algebraic Topology, Example 2.23 (standard reference, not scraped)