How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Suspension isomorphism in reduced singular homology
Statement
Let be an abelian group. For a based well-pointed space —meaning that the basepoint inclusion is a cofibration—reduced singular homology has natural isomorphisms for all integers . Here is the suspension with two distinct apices, as in The adjunction space glued along a continuous map, and, for a nonempty space, the cone and the suspension as quotients of .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A based space whose basepoint inclusion is a cofibration, and its suspension covered by two cone neighborhoods.
Proof
Write for the quotient. The sets and are open, cover , and contract to their respective apices by moving the height coordinate linearly to or . Their intersection is ; projection is a homotopy equivalence, with section at height . Since has its specified basepoint, these spaces are nonempty.
A point has and for : its singular complex has one copy of in each degree, with boundary alternately zero and identity. Thus Contractible nonempty spaces have the homology of a point gives the same groups for , with the degree-zero isomorphism induced by augmentation. For , ordinary exactness in Mayer–Vietoris sequence in singular homology gives , the last isomorphism by Homotopy equivalences induce isomorphisms on singular homology. These degrees are positive, so the groups are also reduced groups.
For , the same exact sequence gives . Its last kernel is exactly . Projection to preserves augmentation and is an ordinary homology isomorphism, so it identifies this kernel with under Augmentation at 0-simplices and reduced singular homology.
Every point of has a height path to an apex, and the height path through joins the two apices. Hence is path connected: differences of singular points bound paths, so augmentation identifies its with and its reduced is zero. This proves the shift for ; for both sides are zero by the stated reduced-complex convention. The arguments include the one-point space and .
A based map induces and preserves these covers and their projections. At chain level the connecting map takes a small cycle to ; applying gives . Thus the connecting maps commute with , and so do their degree-zero kernel restrictions and the projection isomorphisms. This proves naturality in every degree.
Depends on
- Mayer–Vietoris sequence in singular homology
- Augmentation at 0-simplices and reduced singular homology
- Contractible nonempty spaces have the homology of a point
- The adjunction space $Y \cup_f X$ glued along a continuous map, and, for a nonempty space, the cone and the suspension as quotients of $X \times [0,1]$
- Homotopy equivalences induce isomorphisms on singular homology
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
23 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. P. May, A Concise Course in Algebraic Topology, §14.3 (standard reference, not scraped)