Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-06 rests on unproved material (inherited)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Rests on 3 statements not proved in this library, by way of the results it cites. This item cites no such statement directly; it depends on results that do. The unproved premises it inherits are Cohen's first model: an infinite Dedekind-finite set of reals, Sierpiński 1947: the generalised continuum hypothesis implies the Axiom of Choice and The continuum hypothesis and its generalisation are independent of ZFC. Each is recorded with a citation to the literature and is not established here, because the track that would prove it has not yet been developed in this library. Everything else in this proof is proved here.

Suspension isomorphism in reduced singular homology

Statement

Let G be an abelian group. For a based well-pointed space X—meaning that the basepoint inclusion {x0}X is a cofibration—reduced singular homology has natural isomorphisms H~n+1(ΣX;G)H~n(X;G) for all integers n. Here ΣX is the suspension with two distinct apices, as in The adjunction space YfX glued along a continuous map, and, for a nonempty space, the cone and the suspension as quotients of X×[0,1].

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A based space X whose basepoint inclusion is a cofibration, and its suspension covered by two cone neighborhoods.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Write q:X×[0,1]ΣX for the quotient. The sets U=q(X×[0,2/3)) and V=q(X×(1/3,1]) are open, cover ΣX, and contract to their respective apices by moving the height coordinate linearly to 0 or 1. Their intersection is WX×(1/3,2/3); projection p:WX is a homotopy equivalence, with section at height 1/2. Since X has its specified basepoint, these spaces are nonempty.

givenconstruct
2.1

A point has H0(;G)=G and Hj(;G)=0 for j>0: its singular complex has one copy of G in each degree, with boundary alternately zero and identity. Thus Contractible nonempty spaces have the homology of a point gives the same groups for U,V, with the degree-zero isomorphism induced by augmentation. For n1, ordinary exactness in Mayer–Vietoris sequence in singular homology gives Hn+1(ΣX;G)Hn(W;G)Hn(X;G), the last isomorphism by Homotopy equivalences induce isomorphisms on singular homology. These degrees are positive, so the groups are also reduced groups.

step 1.1algebra
3.1

For n=0, the same exact sequence gives 0H1(ΣX;G)δH0(W;G)(ε,ε)GG. Its last kernel is exactly H~0(W;G). Projection to X preserves augmentation and is an ordinary homology isomorphism, so it identifies this kernel with H~0(X;G) under Augmentation at 0-simplices and reduced singular homology.

step 2.1algebra
4.1

Every point of ΣX has a height path to an apex, and the height path through x0 joins the two apices. Hence ΣX is path connected: differences of singular points bound paths, so augmentation identifies its H0 with G and its reduced H0 is zero. This proves the shift for n=1; for n<1 both sides are zero by the stated reduced-complex convention. The arguments include the one-point space and G=0.

step 1.1step 3.1algebra
5.1

A based map f:XY induces [x,t][f(x),t] and preserves these covers and their projections. At chain level the connecting map takes a small cycle z=u+v to [u]; applying f# gives [f#u]=[f#u]. Thus the connecting maps commute with f, and so do their degree-zero kernel restrictions and the projection isomorphisms. This proves naturality in every degree.

step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1algebra

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

23 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources