How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Relative homology of a disk and its boundary
Example
For , is for and zero otherwise. If is the oriented relative fundamental cycle with coefficient , our convention has , the corresponding reduced fundamental class of .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The pair with .
Verification
The disk is contractible, and the sphere has reduced homology only in degree .
For , exactness makes an isomorphism. For , it identifies the relative group with the augmentation kernel rather than with all of . Exactness forces every other relative group to vanish, and the cycle formula gives with the stated sign.
Depends on
Used by
- Relative homology is not homology of the set difference Counterexample
Dependency tree · two levels
8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Allen Hatcher, Algebraic Topology, Example 2.17 (standard reference, not scraped)