How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Sphere eversion
Statement
Assume for the existence and classification assertions. The standard embedding is regularly homotopic, through immersions , to its inside-out reflection (equivalently to for a reflection of ). More precisely, every two immersions are regularly homotopic: the space is path connected, and a regular homotopy from to cannot be chosen through embeddings (this last assertion uses AC, through the Jordan–Brouwer separation theorem).
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The unit sphere , the standard embedding , the antipodal map , a reflection of , the space with the weak compact-open topology, and the formal-immersion space .
The formal data of and of are homotopic: they lie in the same path component of , and the difference class in vanishes. Standard and reflected two-sphere immersions have homotopic formal data in R^3
The derivative map is a weak homotopy equivalence (, compact closed source), hence induces a bijection on path components; for the compact source , path components of are the regular homotopy classes. The Smale–Hirsch immersion theorem, Regular homotopy classes of immersions are formal homotopy classes, Weak homotopy equivalence
All immersions are regularly homotopic, since and ; equivalently the immersion space is path connected by the classification theorem. Smale's classification of sphere immersions in Euclidean space, The second homotopy group of SO(3) vanishes
A regular homotopy is a smooth family whose every slice is an immersion; a homotopy through embeddings is a smooth family whose every slice is injective and immersive, hence an embedding of the compact sphere. Regular homotopy of immersions, Immersions, submersions, and constant-rank maps
Jordan–Brouwer separation (AC): the image of every embedding has exactly two complementary components, one bounded and one unbounded, with common boundary the image. Jordan–Brouwer separation, The Axiom of Choice
The divergence theorem for bounded Euclidean domains: for a bounded domain with boundary and the field , , so the flux of through the outward-oriented boundary equals ; with the opposite orientation the flux is . Divergence on a bounded C1 Euclidean domain
Proof
and are regularly homotopic: by [F1] their formal data lie in one path component of , and the derivative map is a weak homotopy equivalence, hence a bijection on path components by [F2]; path components of are the regular homotopy classes by [F2], so there is a regular homotopy from to . Follow this homotopy by , where is a smooth rotation path from to . For a reflection in a plane with unit normal , fixes and rotates by , so rotation through supplies this path. Reparametrizing both paths to be constant near their endpoints makes their concatenation smooth, with initial map and final map .
is path connected: by [F3] every two immersions of into are regularly homotopic, and regular homotopies are paths in the immersion space by [F4].
No regular homotopy from to can be chosen through embeddings. Suppose were such a family with every slice an embedding. Define the flux , where is the -form of the field , that is, the integral over the parametrised surface of in positively oriented local coordinates. The integrand depends continuously on and is compact, so is continuous. For each , is a smooth embedding of the compact sphere, so by [F5] its image bounds a compact region ; the divergence theorem in the form of [F6] identifies with , the sign being or according to the orientation of the parametrisation, so for every ; a continuous nonzero function on has constant sign.
Evaluating the two ends: for with the positively oriented coordinates of as the boundary of the unit ball, is the outward-oriented flux form of through the unit sphere, whose integral is the volume of the unit ball by [F6]. For or , the chain rule gives , and the identity for either orthogonal map with determinant shows that the pulled-back flux form changes sign: . Hence , contradicting the constant sign forced in step 1.3. Therefore no homotopy from to through embeddings exists, every regular homotopy between them has non-injective slices, and the inside/outside labelling necessarily changes along any eversion. The existence assertion of the theorem is step 1.1 and the path-connectedness is step 1.2; the Jordan–Brouwer input of step 1.3 carries AC, while the existence and classification assertions inherit countable choice from Smale–Hirsch.
Depends on
- Standard and reflected two-sphere immersions have homotopic formal data in R^3
- Smale's classification of sphere immersions in Euclidean space
- The second homotopy group of SO(3) vanishes
- The Smale–Hirsch immersion theorem
- Regular homotopy classes of immersions are formal homotopy classes
- Regular homotopy of immersions
- Weak homotopy equivalence
- Immersions, submersions, and constant-rank maps
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- Jordan–Brouwer separation
- Divergence on a bounded C1 Euclidean domain
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
61 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ralph L. Cohen, Immersions of Manifolds and Homotopy Theory (Harvard CMSA Math-Science Literature Lecture write-up, June 30 2022), §2.1 eversion paragraph (standard reference, not scraped)
- Allen Hatcher, Algebraic Topology, §4.2–4.3 and the smooth Jordan–Brouwer separation of spheres in $\mathbb R^3$ (standard reference, not scraped)