How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
For compact sources the immersion condition is open in the weak smooth topology
Statement
Let be a compact smooth -manifold and a smooth -manifold. Then:
(i) is open in for the weak compact-open topology;
(ii) under for the canonical smooth tangent bundles and their total-space mapping topology, for every smooth the set of smooth bundle maps over with injective for every is open in the space of smooth bundle maps over with the subspace topology inherited from ; equivalently is open in the subspace of consisting of pairs with a bundle-map second component over the first.
The compactness of is essential: the condition is imposed at every point, and only a compact source lets one control all of by finitely many compact chart pieces.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A compact smooth -manifold , a smooth -manifold , and for the tangent-bundle topology (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). The genuine and formal loci are examined at separate arbitrary points.
Basic open sets of the weak compact-open topology on are determined by finitely many charts of , of , compact sets , integers and tolerances ; the same construction applies to (The weak compact-open C-infinity topology on mapping spaces).
A smooth map is an immersion exactly when at every , i.e. some minor of the Jacobian in any chart pair is nonzero (Immersions, submersions, and constant-rank maps).
In local trivializations of and a bundle map over is given by a smooth matrix function on the source chart, and smoothness of the bundle map is equivalent to smoothness of these local matrices (Smoothness of a bundle map is equivalent to smooth local matrices, Vector bundle maps over a smooth base map).
A continuous real-valued function on a nonempty compact metric space attains a minimum, so a continuous strictly positive function has a positive minimum (A continuous real-valued function on a nonempty compact metric space is bounded and attains a greatest and a least value, Open cover, subcover, and compact topological space; a compact subset is a subspace that is compact in its own right); a compact manifold is covered by finitely many small compact chart pieces lying inside prescribed chart domains (Coordinate balls form a basis of a topological manifold, A subspace is compact exactly when every family of open subsets of the ambient space covering it, indexed or not, has finitely many members covering it).
Proof
Empty and have automatic injectivity; if is nonempty and , both loci are empty and open. For (i) in the remaining case, fix an arbitrary immersion . Around each source point take a source chart mapped by into a target chart, and a smaller compact coordinate ball whose interior contains that point. Compactness selects finitely many such pieces covering , with . Write ; its entries are continuous and bounded on .
For each and some minor of is nonzero by [L1], so the maximum of the absolute determinants of the finitely many minors is a continuous strictly positive function on ; by [L3] it has a positive minimum . Let bound the absolute values of all entries of on . The determinant of an matrix is a polynomial in the entries, so there is , depending only on , , , such that any matrix with entrywise satisfies for the maximizing minor, hence has a nonzero minor. Choosing the finitely many uses no choice, and may be taken in the form with the least suitable .
Let be the basic weak open set of maps determined by the data , , , , . Its definition constrains the partial derivatives of first order of on to differ from those of by less than ; in particular every entry of the Jacobian of differs from the corresponding entry of by less than at every point of . By step 2.1 every such has rank at every point of , so by [L1] every is an immersion. Hence contains the basic neighbourhood of and is open.
For (ii), independently fix an arbitrary fibrewise injective pair , whose base map need not be an immersion. Choose compact pieces and induced bundle charts over source and target chart domains. In such charts a bundle map has the form . The compact set of vectors with , , is a valid compact test set in ; zeroth-order control of the images of these vectors controls every column of . Zeroth-order control of keeps these images in the same target bundle chart. Each matrix has rank by the injectivity of , so its own maximum of absolute -minors has a positive minimum on . Apply the polynomial determinant estimate of step 2.1 to these matrices, independently of . This gives a neighbourhood of the pair , among all bundle-map pairs, on which all fibre maps remain injective. Restricting that neighbourhood to the fixed-base fibre proves its openness as well.
Depends on
- The weak compact-open C-infinity topology on mapping spaces
- Immersions, submersions, and constant-rank maps
- Formal immersion between smooth manifolds
- Vector bundle maps over a smooth base map
- Smoothness of a bundle map is equivalent to smooth local matrices
- A continuous real-valued function on a nonempty compact metric space is bounded and attains a greatest and a least value
- Open cover, subcover, and compact topological space; a compact subset is a subspace that is compact in its own right
- Smooth manifolds and their smooth charts
- Coordinate balls form a basis of a topological manifold
- A subspace is compact exactly when every family of open subsets of the ambient space covering it, indexed or not, has finitely many members covering it
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
61 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Morris W. Hirsch, Differential Topology, Ch. 2 §1, pp. 34–36 (the strong C^r and C^infinity topologies; openness of the immersion condition) and Ch. 2 §3 (standard reference, not scraped)
- John Francis, The h-Principle, Lecture 3: Immersion theory (notes by O. Gwilliam), PDF pp. 1–4: Proposition 2.2 and the flexible-sheaf discussion (standard reference, not scraped)