Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

For compact sources the immersion condition is open in the weak smooth topology

Statement

Let M be a compact smooth m-manifold and N a smooth n-manifold. Then:

(i) Imm⁡(M,N) is open in C∞(M,N) for the weak compact-open C∞ topology;

(ii) under ACω for the canonical smooth tangent bundles and their total-space mapping topology, for every smooth f:M→N the set of smooth bundle maps F:TM→TN over f with Fx injective for every x is open in the space of smooth bundle maps over f with the subspace topology inherited from C∞(TM,TN); equivalently FImm⁡(M,N) is open in the subspace of C∞(M,N)×C∞(TM,TN) consisting of pairs with a bundle-map second component over the first.

The compactness of M is essential: the condition is imposed at every point, and only a compact source lets one control all of M by finitely many compact chart pieces.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A compact smooth m-manifold M, a smooth n-manifold N, and ACω for the tangent-bundle topology (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). The genuine and formal loci are examined at separate arbitrary points.

[F1]

Basic open sets of the weak compact-open C∞ topology on C∞(M,N) are determined by finitely many charts (Ui,φi) of M, (Vi,ψi) of N, compact sets Ki⊆Ui, integers ri≥0 and tolerances εi>0; the same construction applies to C∞(TM,TN) (The weak compact-open C-infinity topology on mapping spaces).

[L1]

A smooth map g is an immersion exactly when rank⁡dgx=m at every x, i.e. some m×m minor of the Jacobian in any chart pair is nonzero (Immersions, submersions, and constant-rank maps).

[L2]

In local trivializations of TM and TN a bundle map over f is given by a smooth matrix function on the source chart, and smoothness of the bundle map is equivalent to smoothness of these local matrices (Smoothness of a bundle map is equivalent to smooth local matrices, Vector bundle maps over a smooth base map).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1L1L3givenconstruct

Empty M and m=0 have automatic injectivity; if M is nonempty and m>n, both loci are empty and open. For (i) in the remaining case, fix an arbitrary immersion f:M→N. Around each source point take a source chart mapped by f into a target chart, and a smaller compact coordinate ball whose interior contains that point. Compactness selects finitely many such pieces Ki⊂Ui covering M, with f(Ui)⊂Vi. Write Ji(x)=D(ψi∘f∘φi−1)(φi(x)); its entries are continuous and bounded on Ki.

2.1L1L3step 1.1algebrachoose

For each i and x∈Ki some m×m minor of Ji(x) is nonzero by [L1], so the maximum δi(x) of the absolute determinants of the finitely many minors is a continuous strictly positive function on Ki; by [L3] it has a positive minimum ci. Let Bi≥1 bound the absolute values of all entries of Ji on Ki. The determinant of an m×m matrix is a polynomial in the entries, so there is ηi>0, depending only on m, Bi, ci, such that any matrix J′ with ∣J′−Ji(x)∣<ηi entrywise satisfies ∣det⁡J′−det⁡Ji(x)∣<ci/2 for the maximizing minor, hence has a nonzero m×m minor. Choosing the finitely many ηi uses no choice, and may be taken in the form 2−k with the least suitable k.

3.1F1L1step 2.1algebra

Let U be the basic weak open set of maps g:M→N determined by the data (Ui,φi), (Vi,ψi), Ki, ri=1, εi=ηi. Its definition constrains the partial derivatives of first order of ψi∘g∘φi−1 on φi(Ki) to differ from those of f by less than ηi; in particular every entry of the Jacobian of g differs from the corresponding entry of Ji by less than ηi at every point of Ki. By step 2.1 every such g has rank m at every point of M, so by [L1] every g∈U is an immersion. Hence Imm⁡(M,N) contains the basic neighbourhood U of f and is open.

4.1F1L2step 2.1construct∎

For (ii), independently fix an arbitrary fibrewise injective pair (f,F), whose base map need not be an immersion. Choose compact pieces Ki and induced bundle charts over source and target chart domains. In such charts a bundle map has the form (x,v)↦(g(x),Ai(x)v). The compact set of vectors (x,ej) with x∈Ki, 1≤j≤m, is a valid compact test set in TM; zeroth-order control of the images of these vectors controls every column of Ai. Zeroth-order control of g keeps these images in the same target bundle chart. Each matrix Ai has rank m by the injectivity of F, so its own maximum of absolute m-minors has a positive minimum on Ki. Apply the polynomial determinant estimate of step 2.1 to these matrices, independently of df. This gives a neighbourhood of the pair (f,F), among all bundle-map pairs, on which all fibre maps remain injective. Restricting that neighbourhood to the fixed-base fibre proves its openness as well.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

61 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources