Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The Schauder estimate fails at the H"older endpoint α=1

Statement refuted

The interior Schauder estimate of Interior Schauder estimate for uniformly elliptic equations does not extend to the endpoint α=1: there is no constant C<∞ such that [D2Nf]C0,1(R2)≤C∥f∥C0,1(R2) for every compactly supported Lipschitz source f and its Newtonian potential Nf. The explicit counterexample below uses a Lipschitz source whose angular profile is the degree-one homogeneous mode rcos⁡3θ; the second derivatives inherit an rlog⁡r term, which tends to zero but is not Lipschitz at the origin. Wang's theory gives the sharp bound with the logarithm ∣x∣∣log⁡∣x∣∣ and the example shows that this logarithm cannot be removed.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: ACω, the cut-off function χ with χ=1 on [0,1], χ(r)=2−r for 1<r<2 and χ(r)=0 for r≥2 (with χ(r):=0 for r<0), the source f(x1,x2):=χ(r) (x13−3x1x22)/r2 for r>0 and f(0):=0, the local function p(r,θ):=−16r3log⁡rcos⁡3θ on 0<r<1 with p(0):=0, and its Newtonian potential Nf.

[A1]

The only choice principle used is Countable Choice ACω; no full Axiom of Choice is used. (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω))

[F1]

The Newtonian potential Nf is the convolution integral with the kernel Φ wherever defined (Newtonian potential of compactly supported data); Φ is the kernel candidate for −Δ, with the sign convention fixed in Fundamental solution for the positive operator minus Laplacian. The pointwise equation −ΔNf=f used below is supplied by [F2].

[F2]

For f∈Cc0,α(R2), 0<α<1, the potential Nf is C2 and satisfies −ΔNf=f pointwise; the local Hölder classes are those of Local Hölder and scaled C-two-alpha norms on balls, and the cancelled representation of the second derivatives is the one of The cancelled representation of the second derivatives of Newtonian potentials. (Hölder data give a classical Newtonian solution)

[F3]

Harmonic functions are real analytic, so on every compact subset of their domain all partial derivatives are bounded and, in particular, the Hessian is Lipschitz. (Harmonic functions are real analytic)

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1givenalgebraA1

The source is compactly supported and Lipschitz. For r>0 one has x13−3x1x22=r3cos⁡3θ, so f(x)=χ(r) rcos⁡3θ, a product of the radial function χ with the degree-one homogeneous function g(x):=rcos⁡3θ. The function g is smooth off the origin, satisfies ∣g∣≤r and, being 1-homogeneous, has ∣∇g∣≤C0 globally, while χ is Lipschitz with support in Bˉ2; hence f is compactly supported, sup⁡∣f∣≤2 and [f]0,1≤C0∥χ∥∞+2[χ]0,1<∞, that is f∈Cc0,1(R2) with finite C0,1 norm.

1.2givenalgebra

The explicit local solution. Put P(x):=x13−3x1x22, so that P=r3cos⁡3θ and p=−16Plog⁡r for 0<r<1. The polynomial P is harmonic: ∂11P=6x1, ∂22P=−6x1, hence ΔP=0; moreover ∇P⋅∇log⁡r=Pixi/r2 with Pixi=3(x12−x22)x1+(−6x1x2)x2=3x1(x12−3x22)=3r3cos⁡3θ, so ∇P⋅∇log⁡r=3rcos⁡3θ; and Δlog⁡r=0 for r>0. Therefore, for 0<r<1, Δp=−16(ΔPlog⁡r+2∇P⋅∇log⁡r+PΔlog⁡r)=−16⋅2⋅3rcos⁡3θ=−rcos⁡3θ=−f(x), because χ(r)=1 there. At the origin p is C2 with D2p(0)=0: indeed p=O(r3∣log⁡r∣), ∂ip=O(r2∣log⁡r∣) and ∂i∂jp=O(r∣log⁡r∣) as r↓0, as the three terms of the product rule show, so Δp(0)=0=f(0) and the identity −Δp=f holds pointwise on all of the unit disc.

2.1step 1.2F1F2F3algebra

The potential differs from p by a harmonic function. The source f is Lipschitz, hence belongs to Cc0,α(R2) for every 0<α<1, so by [F2] the potential Nf is C2 with −ΔNf=f pointwise. Step 1.2 gives −Δp=f pointwise on the unit disc, so Δ(Nf−p)=0 there; by [F3] the function H:=Nf−p is real analytic on the unit disc and its Hessian is Lipschitz on B1/2(0), say ∣D2H(x)−D2H(y)∣≤M∣x−y∣ for x,y∈B1/2(0).

3.1step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1algebra

Failure of the Lipschitz bound. On the positive x1-axis p(x1,0)=−16x13log⁡x1 for 0<x1<1, so ∂11p(x1,0)=−16(6x1log⁡x1+5x1)=−x1log⁡x1−56x1,∂11p(0,0)=0. By step 2.1, ∂11Nf(x1,0)=−x1log⁡x1−56x1+∂11H(x1,0) and the last term deviates from its value at 0 by at most Mx1. Hence for 0<x1<12, ∣∂11Nf(x1,0)−∂11Nf(0,0)∣x1≥∣log⁡x1∣−56−M⟶+∞(x1↓0). Therefore [D2Nf]0,1=sup⁡x≠y∣D2Nf(x)−D2Nf(y)∣/∣x−y∣≥lim sup⁡x1↓0(…)=+∞, while ∥f∥C0,1=sup⁡∣f∣+[f]0,1<∞ by step 1.1.

4.1step 1.1step 3.1given∎

Conclusion. The compactly supported Lipschitz source f of step 1.1 has finite C0,1 norm, but its Newtonian potential has [D2Nf]0,1=+∞ by step 3.1; hence no finite constant C can satisfy [D2Nf]C0,1(R2)≤C∥f∥C0,1(R2), and the endpoint α=1 version of the Schauder estimate is false. The example is consistent with the true sharp result: D2Nf is bounded and has the logarithmic modulus ∣x∣∣log⁡∣x∣∣, so the failure is exactly the loss of one logarithm, not a loss of boundedness.

Remarks

  • The computation is the standard sharpness construction: the degree-one homogeneous forcing rcos⁡3θ produces a degree-three logarithmic potential, and the positive axis is where the log⁡ term is visible. The angular factor is immaterial; the angular mode cos⁡3θ is resonant with the degree-three radial ansatz. A degree-one spherical harmonic instead gives linear forcing and does not produce this logarithmic obstruction.
  • The example refutes the endpoint case of the interior estimate for the Laplacian; it does not contradict the strict-range estimate for 0<α<1, which is proved for compactly supported H"older data and has no uniform Lipschitz-endpoint constant. Wang equation (1.4) bounds the Hessian increment by Cnd(sup⁡∣u∣+∥f∥C0,1∣log⁡d∣), with d=∣x−y∣.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

91 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources