How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Circle rotations preserve Lebesgue measure
Statement
Assume countable choice. For every real , is an invertible measure-preserving transformation for both Borel Lebesgue probability on the circle and its completion.
Facts & Assumptions
The circle has Borel probability and R_alpha is continuous; the measure construction uses countable choice. The circle, rotations and the doubling map.
Translation preserves Lebesgue measurable sets and their measures. Lebesgue outer measure, Lebesgue measurability and Lebesgue measure are unchanged by translation.
A generating pi-system containing the finite-mass whole space tests preservation. Measure preservation can be checked on a generating pi-system.
A Borel preserving map also preserves the completion under countable choice. Compositions, iterates and completions preserve invariance.
Proof
Given: Assume countable choice. For every real , is an invertible measure-preserving transformation for both Borel Lebesgue probability on the circle and its completion.
Let . For any Borel , . The two pieces lie respectively in and and are disjoint. Translation invariance and additivity give . For a=0 the second piece is empty.
In particular this proves the inverse-image identity on the pi-system of half-open intervals and the whole circle. These generate the circle Borel sigma-algebra: ordinary open intervals are countable unions of half-open subintervals, and the Borel sigma-algebras agree by the circle definition. The whole-space measure is one, so the generating criterion applies (or directly use the identity for every Borel B in step 1.1). The completion clause extends preservation to all completed sets. The countable-choice use is exactly the earlier Lebesgue and completion construction.
Fractional-part arithmetic gives . The same argument applies to , so the inverse is measurable for either sigma-algebra. Thus invertibility here includes measurability of the inverse.
Depends on
- The circle, rotations and the doubling map
- Measure preservation can be checked on a generating pi-system
- Compositions, iterates and completions preserve invariance
- Lebesgue outer measure, Lebesgue measurability and Lebesgue measure are unchanged by translation
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
29 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- E–W Example 2.2 p.14 (standard reference, not scraped)