How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Circle rotation is ergodic for Lebesgue measure exactly at irrational angles
Statement
Assume countable choice. The circle rotation is ergodic for Borel Lebesgue probability and for its completion if and only if is irrational.
Facts & Assumptions
All positive and negative powers of a rotation preserve either measure. Circle rotations preserve Lebesgue measure.
Integer powers of an irrational rotation move any center arbitrarily close to another. Irrational circle orbits are dense.
Under countable choice, a positive measurable set has density-one points. Lebesgue density theorem.
The strict invariant-set criterion is equivalent to the mod-null criterion. Equivalent invariant-set and invariant-function criteria for ergodicity.
Proof
Given: Assume countable choice. The circle rotation is ergodic for Borel Lebesgue probability and for its completion if and only if is irrational.
If with integers p and q>=1, the set is Borel, has measure , and is permuted by R_alpha. Thus and the rotation is not ergodic for either measure. This includes integral alpha with q=1.
Now let alpha be irrational and let A be a strictly invariant measurable set. Suppose both A and its complement have positive measure. Choose density-one points a in A and c in its complement, different from the cut point zero. For sufficiently small , the circle balls I=B(a,r), J=B(c,r) have length 2r and satisfy and . The ordinary density theorem applies because these small balls at the chosen points do not cross the cut.
Choose an integer m with . Strict invariance and invertibility give , and the rotated interval I has a portion outside A of measure less than r/5. Its intersection with J has length greater than : both are radius-r arcs whose centers are less than r/10 apart. Subtracting the two exceptional portions, this intersection would contain points in both A and its complement on a set of measure at least , impossible. Thus every strict invariant A has measure zero or one, proving ergodicity. Together with step 1.1 this proves both directions.
Depends on
Used by
- Irrational rotation is ergodic but not weakly mixing Counterexample
- Kac mean return to a half-circle under irrational rotation Example
- False: ergodicity implies strong mixing False statement
Dependency tree · two levels
26 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- E–W Exercise 2.4.1 p.32; Proposition 2.16 conclusion (standard reference, not scraped)