Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-26
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

An isometric embedding is injective and carries the metric topology of the source onto the subspace topology of its image

Statement

Let (X,dX)(X,d_X) and (Y,dY)(Y,d_Y) be metric spaces and let f:XYf : X \to Y be an isometric embedding (Isometry, isometric embedding, and the subspace metric on a subset). Write Z:=f[X]YZ := f[X] \subseteq Y with its subspace metric dZd_Z. Then:

  1. ff is injective (Injection, surjection, bijection).
  2. ff, viewed as a map XZX \to Z, is an isometry.
  3. f[BX(x,r)]=BZ(f(x),r)f[B_X(x,r)] = B_Z(f(x),r) for every xXx \in X and r>0r > 0 (Open ball, closed ball and sphere in a metric space).
  4. A subset UXU \subseteq X is open in (X,dX)(X,d_X) if and only if f[U]f[U] is open in (Z,dZ)(Z,d_Z) (The metric topology: a set is open when every one of its points has a ball around it inside the set; closed means open complement). So Uf[U]U \mapsto f[U] is a bijection from the metric topology of XX onto the subspace topology of f[X]f[X], and ff is a homeomorphism onto its image.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Metric spaces (X,dX)(X,d_X), (Y,dY)(Y,d_Y), an isometric embedding f:XYf : X \to Y, the image Z:=f[X]Z := f[X] with the subspace metric dZ=dY(Z×Z)d_Z = d_Y \restriction (Z \times Z), and the map g:ZXg : Z \to X inverse to f:XZf : X \to Z once claim 2 is available.

[A1]

Isometric embedding: dY(f(x),f(x))=dX(x,x)d_Y(f(x),f(x')) = d_X(x,x') for all x,xXx, x' \in X; the subspace metric on ZZ is the restriction of dYd_Y (Isometry, isometric embedding, and the subspace metric on a subset).

[A2]

Separation (M1): dX(x,x)=0d_X(x,x') = 0 if and only if x=xx = x' (Metric space: d(x,y)=0d(x,y) = 0 iff x=yx = y, symmetry, and the triangle inequality; pseudometric and ultrametric).

[L1]

Balls: BX(x,r)={x:dX(x,x)<r}B_X(x,r) = \{x' : d_X(x,x') < r\}, and likewise in ZZ with dZd_Z (Open ball, closed ball and sphere in a metric space).

[L3]

A bijection hh and its inverse satisfy h[S]=(h1)1[S]h[S] = (h^{-1})^{-1}[S] and h1[h[S]]=Sh^{-1}[h[S]] = S for every subset SS of the domain (Injection, surjection, bijection).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Injectivity: if f(x)=f(x)f(x) = f(x') then dX(x,x)=dY(f(x),f(x))=0d_X(x,x') = d_Y(f(x),f(x')) = 0, hence x=xx = x' by (M1); this is claim 1.

A1A2
2.1

As a map XZX \to Z the function ff is surjective, ZZ being its image by definition, and it is injective by step 1.1, so it is a bijection XZX \to Z; and dZ(f(x),f(x))=dY(f(x),f(x))=dX(x,x)d_Z(f(x),f(x')) = d_Y(f(x),f(x')) = d_X(x,x'), since dZd_Z is the restriction of dYd_Y, so it is an isometry, which is claim 2.

step 1.1A1
3.1

Both f:XZf : X \to Z and its inverse g:ZXg : Z \to X are continuous, with δ:=ε\delta := \varepsilon serving at every point in both directions, because dZ(f(x),f(x))=dX(x,x)d_Z(f(x),f(x')) = d_X(x,x') and, writing z=f(x)z = f(x), z=f(x)z' = f(x'), also dX(g(z),g(z))=dZ(z,z)d_X(g(z),g(z')) = d_Z(z,z').

step 2.1A1L2
3.2

Claim 3: f[BX(x,r)]={f(x):dX(x,x)<r}={f(x):dZ(f(x),f(x))<r}f[B_X(x,r)] = \{f(x') : d_X(x,x') < r\} = \{f(x') : d_Z(f(x),f(x')) < r\}, and as ff is onto ZZ the latter set is {zZ:dZ(f(x),z)<r}=BZ(f(x),r)\{z \in Z : d_Z(f(x),z) < r\} = B_Z(f(x),r).

step 2.1A1L1
4.1

By [L2] applied to the continuous maps of step 3.1, the preimage under f:XZf : X \to Z of every open subset of ZZ is open in XX, and the preimage under gg of every open subset of XX is open in ZZ.

step 3.1L2
5.1

Claim 4: for UXU \subseteq X we have f[U]=g1[U]f[U] = g^{-1}[U], so if UU is open in XX then f[U]f[U] is open in ZZ by step 4.1; conversely U=f1[f[U]]U = f^{-1}[f[U]], so if f[U]f[U] is open in ZZ then UU is open in XX by step 4.1. Hence Uf[U]U \mapsto f[U] maps the topology of XX into that of ZZ, is injective because ff is, and is onto because any open WZW \subseteq Z equals f[f1[W]]f[f^{-1}[W]] with f1[W]f^{-1}[W] open.

step 2.1step 4.1L3
6.1

Claims 1, 2, 3 and 4 are established by steps 1.1, 2.1, 3.2 and 5.1, so an isometric embedding identifies XX with the metric subspace f[X]f[X] of YY, as a metric space and hence as a topological one.

step 1.1step 3.2step 5.1

Remarks

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 60 results over 15 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources