Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Model jacobi fields in positive zero and negative curvature

Example

Assume the inherited Axiom of Countable Choice ACω. Let (Mn,g), n≥2, be a Riemannian manifold of constant sectional curvature k∈R, let γ:I→M be a unit-speed geodesic on an interval I⊆R with 0∈I, write T=γ˙, let Pt denote parallel transport along γ, and let E be a vector of the normal space N0={X∈Tγ(0)M:g(X,T(0))=0}. Let J be the unique Jacobi field along γ with J(0)=0,DtJ(0)=E. Then, for every t∈I, J(t)=sn⁡k(t) PtE=A(t)E, where A is the radial Jacobi tensor. When E≠0, the three signs of k give the following separation behaviours:

  • k>0: J(t)=sin⁡(k t)kPtE — the sine branch, whose first positive zero is t=π/k; if this time belongs to I, then J vanishes there and the radial field refocuses;
  • k=0: J(t)=t PtE — the linear branch, with no zero other than t=0;
  • k<0: J(t)=sinh⁡(−k t)−kPtE — the hyperbolic-sine branch, positive and strictly increasing in length for t>0, with no positive zero.

For E=0 the field is identically zero. All zero-time claims concern only times contained in I.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The inherited ACω of [A1], a real number k, a Riemannian manifold (Mn,g) of constant sectional curvature k with n≥2, a unit-speed geodesic γ:I→M with 0∈I, parallel transport Pt along γ, a normal vector E∈N0, and the unique Jacobi field J with J(0)=0, DtJ(0)=E.

[A1]

The countable-choice premise is the inherited ACω (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)), entering through the constant-curvature interface Constant sectional curvature and space form; the Jacobi initial-value construction used in Radial Jacobi tensor requires no choice.

[F1]

Constant curvature: a Riemannian manifold has constant sectional curvature k exactly when R(X,Y)Z=k(g(Y,Z)X−g(X,Z)Y) (Curvature tensor of constant sectional curvature); the predicate and the space-form terminology are those of Constant sectional curvature and space form.

[F2]

The comparison sine: sn⁡k is the piecewise function of Comparison sine, cosine and cotangent functions with sn⁡k(0)=0 and sn⁡k′(0)=1, positive on (0,π/k) when k>0, with sn⁡k(π/k)=0, and with no positive zero when k≤0. It satisfies sn⁡k′′+ksn⁡k=0 (Model functions solve the constant curvature jacobi equation).

[F3]

Jacobi fields and radial data: a Jacobi field along γ solves Dt2J+R(J,T)T=0 (Jacobi field, Covariant derivative along a curve); for every w∈N0 the unique Jacobi field Jw with Jw(0)=0 and DtJw(0)=w has A(t)w=Jw(t) and is normal, g(Jw(t),T(t))=0 (Radial Jacobi tensor).

[F4]

Parallel transport: Pt is characterized by P0=id and Dt(PtE)=0 for every E (Parallel section along a curve), and it preserves the metric, hence preserves inner products and normality (Levi civita parallel transport preserves lengths angles and volume).

[F5]

Realizations: the round sphere SRn of Round sphere model geometry is a complete Riemannian manifold of constant sectional curvature 1/R2 for every R>0, and the half-space model of Upper half-space model geometry is a complete Riemannian manifold of constant sectional curvature −a2 for every a>0.

Verification

technique · direct: the curvature of a constant-curvature manifold acts as $k$ times the identity on normal vectors, so the explicit field $\operatorname{sn}_k(t)P_tE$ satisfies the Jacobi equation with the prescribed initial data, and uniqueness identifies it with $A(t)E$; the three signs are then read off the comparison functions
1.1F1F3given

On normal vectors the curvature endomorphism is k times the identity. [F1, F3, given] Let X be a vector field along γ with X(t)⊥T(t) for every t. Since g(T,T)≡1, the formula of [F1] gives R(X,T)T=k(g(T,T)X−g(X,T)T)=kX. The computation is pointwise, so it applies at every t∈I and for every normal vector there.

2.1F2F3F4step 1.1

The field F(t)=sn⁡k(t)PtE is a Jacobi field with the initial data of J. [F2, F3, F4, step 1.1] Because Dt(PtE)=0 by [F4], the covariant derivative along γ acts on the scalar multiple by DtF=sn⁡k′(t)PtE,Dt2F=sn⁡k′′(t)PtE=−ksn⁡k(t)PtE, where the last equality is the differential equation of [F2]. The parallel field PtE remains normal to T by the metric preservation in [F4], so step 1.1 applies to the field F and gives R(F,T)T=kF=ksn⁡k(t)PtE. Adding the two displays, Dt2F+R(F,T)T=0: the field F is a Jacobi field along γ. At t=0 the initial data of [F2] give F(0)=sn⁡k(0)P0E=0 and DtF(0)=sn⁡k′(0)E=E, because P0 is the identity.

3.1F3step 2.1

The model field is the radial field of E. [F3, step 2.1] By [F3] the Jacobi field with J(0)=0 and DtJ(0)=E is unique, and A(t)E is by definition that field. Since F of step 2.1 is a Jacobi field with exactly these initial data, F=J, that is J(t)=A(t)E=sn⁡k(t)PtE for every t∈I. Both sides are normal fields along γ by [F3] and [F4].

4.1F2F4step 3.1

The three sign branches and their zero sets. [F2, step 3.1] Inserting the piecewise formula for sn⁡k from [F2] into step 3.1 gives the three displays of the statement. Since Pt preserves lengths, ∣J(t)∣=∣sn⁡k(t)∣ ∣E∣. For E≠0, the zeros on I are exactly the multiples of π/k lying in I when k>0, and only t=0 when k≤0. In particular the first positive spherical zero occurs at π/k if that time lies in I. For k<0 the scalar profile is positive and strictly increasing on t>0; the field grows without bound only if I contains arbitrarily large positive times. For E=0 the field vanishes identically.

5.1F3F5step 1.1step 3.1step 4.1∎

Cases, realizations and consistency. [F3, F5, step 1.1, step 3.1, step 4.1] The case E=0 gives the zero field in step 3.1, and the case t=0 gives J(0)=0; the formula is linear in E, so it exhibits A(t) as a linear map N0→Nt as asserted in [F3]. For k>0 the value k is realized by the round sphere SRn of [F5] with R=1/k, and the refocusing time π/k=πR is exactly the cut time of Round sphere model geometry, so the radial field refocuses at the antipode; for k<0 the half-space model of [F5] with a=−k realizes the hyperbolic-sine branch. In particular no curvature sign is excluded and no upper bound on the domain I is needed: the identity of step 3.1 holds on all of I, including beyond a zero when k>0. Only the inherited [A1] choice is used; the parallel fields, the geodesic and the model functions are explicit.

Source locator

Datar §24.1, pp.173–176, computes the model Jacobi fields of the constant curvature spaces and their curvature; Eschenburg §2, pp.6–11, records the three sign branches. The derivation above is carried out locally from the published constant-curvature tensor identity and the in-run comparison-function and radial-tensor items.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

74 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources