How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Rauch comparison between euclidean and spherical geodesics
Example
Assume the inherited Axiom of Countable Choice . Compare the radial normal Jacobi fields of the unit round sphere (sectional curvature ) and of Euclidean space (curvature ) with equal unit initial derivatives: along a unit-speed geodesic of the spherical field has length while along a unit-speed straight line in the Euclidean field has length Rauch's first comparison gives with strict inequality for every interior time . The endpoint is the antipodal conjugate instant of the sphere, where the spherical field returns to zero.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The inherited of [A1], the unit round sphere and Euclidean space , unit-speed geodesics in and in , and unit normal vectors with parallel transports .
The countable-choice premise is the inherited (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()), used through the Jacobi-field and parallel transport suppliers.
Comparison sine (Comparison sine, cosine and cotangent functions, Model functions solve the constant curvature jacobi equation): and , , , , and for .
Model geometry (Constant sectional curvature and space form, Curvature tensor of constant sectional curvature, Jacobi field): the sphere is a manifold of constant curvature and Euclidean space one of curvature , so for a parallel normal unit field the fields and satisfy the Jacobi equation on the respective geodesics.
Parallel transport (Existence and uniqueness of parallel sections, Levi civita parallel transport preserves lengths angles and volume): the parallel field with prescribed unit normal value exists, is unique and preserves norms and orthogonality.
Rauch comparison, first form (Rauch comparison theorem first form): with the pointwise radial curvature hypothesis and no conjugate point of the first manifold in , normal radial fields with equal positive initial-derivative norms satisfy on .
The strict sine bound (Sine is positive and cosine is strictly decreasing on (0,2), with cos 2 at most -1/3, The mean value theorem, as the case of Cauchy's: for continuous on with and differentiable on there is with , Sine and cosine defined by their real power series, Parity and the Pythagorean identity for sine and cosine): , , is strictly decreasing on , so for and some ; and for all by the Pythagorean identity.
Verification
Proof technique: direct: identify the two explicit model fields, apply Rauch's first form on for every , extend to by continuity, and verify strictness in the interior by the mean value theorem.
The two explicit fields. [F1, F2, F3, given] Let be a unit-speed great-circle geodesic of and a unit-speed straight line in ; let be unit normal vectors at the starting points and their parallel transports. Put By [F1] and [F2] both are normal Jacobi fields with vanishing value at and initial-derivative norm , and by the isometry property of parallel transport [F3],
Rauch comparison on , . [F1, F2, F4, step 1.1, given] Fix . Every radial sectional curvature of the sphere is and every radial sectional curvature of Euclidean space is [F2], so the pointwise curvature hypothesis of [F4] holds with the sphere as the more curved manifold; and the sphere has no conjugate point in because the spherical radial fields are times parallel normal fields, which vanish only at multiples of [F1]. Applying [F4] to the fields of step 1.1 gives
Extension to the endpoint and strictness. [F5, step 2.1, given] Both sides of are continuous on , and step 2.1 gives the inequality on for every ; hence it holds on , where . For strictness let . If , then by [F5] for some and , so . If , then by [F5]. In both cases the inequality is strict, while at the spherical field returns to zero together with its antipodal conjugate point. Both model fields are explicit, so the inherited of [A1] is not drawn on beyond its declaration.
Source locator
Datar §25.2–25.3 (printed pp.185–189) uses the sphere-versus-Euclidean and
Euclidean-versus-hyperbolic pairs as the basic illustrations of the
comparison signs, and §24.1 gives the model fields ;
Eschenburg §3 (printed p.13) records the same model cases of Rauch I. The
verification above is carried out from the in-run Rauch first form and the
published trigonometric facts.
Depends on
- Rauch comparison theorem first form
- Comparison sine, cosine and cotangent functions
- Model functions solve the constant curvature jacobi equation
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- Constant sectional curvature and space form
- Curvature tensor of constant sectional curvature
- Jacobi field
- Existence and uniqueness of parallel sections
- Levi civita parallel transport preserves lengths angles and volume
- Sine is positive and cosine is strictly decreasing on (0,2), with cos 2 at most -1/3
- The mean value theorem, as the case $g(x) = x$ of Cauchy's: for $f$ continuous on $[a,b]$ with $a < b$ and differentiable on $(a,b)$ there is $c \in (a,b)$ with $f(b) - f(a) = f'(c)(b-a)$
- Parity and the Pythagorean identity for sine and cosine
- Sine and cosine defined by their real power series
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
59 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ved Datar, Lectures on Riemannian Geometry (2025) (standard reference, not scraped)
- J.-H. Eschenburg, Comparison Theorems in Riemannian Geometry (standard reference, not scraped)