Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-sol)audited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The fundamental Hessian is not absolutely locally integrable

Statement

Assume Countable Choice and n≥2. Every nonzero Cartesian second derivative ∂ijΦ has ∣∂ijΦ∣∉L1(Bε(0)) for every ε>0, although the signed kernel has annular cancellation. Thus the formal absolutely convergent integral ∫∂ijΦ(x−y)f(y)dy can fail at a point with f(x)≠0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Assume ACω, n≥2, the normalized kernel Φ, and indices 1≤i,j≤n.

[A1]

Countable Choice, written ACω, is assumed (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). It is used only through the named sphere, polar-coordinate, ball-measure, interval-measure and null-set interfaces below; no full Axiom of Choice is used.

[F1]

For n≥3, Φ(x)=∣x∣2−n/((n−2)ωn−1); for n=2, Φ(x)=−(2π)−1log⁡∣x∣, with ωn−1>0 (Fundamental solution for the positive operator minus Laplacian).

[F2]

For Borel E⊆Sn−1, the polar surface measure is σ(E)=nλn({rω:ω∈E, 0<r≤1}) (The polar surface set function on the unit sphere).

[F3]

Orthogonal transformations preserve σ (Agreement with the existing polar sphere measure).

[F4]

Under ACω, nonnegative Borel functions satisfy the polar integration formula (Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma).

[F25]

Under ACω, σ is a finite Borel measure on Sn−1 (Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma).

[F5]

Under Countable Choice, every Euclidean ball of positive radius has positive finite Lebesgue measure (Euclidean balls have positive finite Lebesgue measure).

[F6]

B(x,r)={y:d(x,y)<r} is the open metric ball for r>0 (Open ball, closed ball and sphere in a metric space).

[F7]

Borel sets form the sigma-algebra generated by open sets (The Borel sigma-algebra of a topological space).

[F8]

A scalar function is Ck when its iterated coordinate derivatives through order k exist and are continuous (Ck maps and multi-index derivative notation in Euclidean space).

[F9]

A Euclidean map is Ck when each component is Ck (Ck Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms).

[F10]

Finite sums and products and compositions of Ck Euclidean maps are Ck (Ck Euclidean maps are closed under componentwise algebra and composition).

[F11]

The total chain rule gives D(g∘f)(a)=Dg(f(a))∘Df(a) (The chain rule for total derivatives: D(g∘f)(a)=Dg(f(a))∘Df(a)).

[F12]

The matrix of a total derivative gives the coordinate partial derivatives (A total derivative computes every directional derivative, and its matrix is the Jacobian).

[F13]

For t>0, (tα)′=αtα−1 for every real α (Continuity and derivatives of positive-base real powers).

[F16]

A measurable real or complex function is integrable exactly when its absolute value has finite integral (Integrable real and complex functions, and their integrals).

[F26]

For a real measurable function u, the integral is defined only when at most one of ∫u+ and ∫u− is infinite, where u+=max⁡(u,0) and u−=max⁡(−u,0) (Integrable real and complex functions, and their integrals).

[F17]

A measurable function is locally integrable on Rn when its absolute integral is finite on every positive-radius ball (A locally integrable function on Rn).

[F18]

The nonnegative integral is monotone: 0≤g≤h implies ∫g≤∫h (Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral).

[F19]

For nonnegative measurable g and measurable E, ∫Eg dμ=∫g1E dμ (Integral over a measurable subset).

[F20]

If g is nonnegative measurable, E↦∫Eg dμ is a measure (The indefinite integral of a nonnegative measurable function is a measure).

[F21]

Every one-dimensional interval with finite endpoints is measurable and has measure equal to its length, for all endpoint conventions (A box in Rn with parameters ai≤bi is Lebesgue measurable of measure ∏i<n(bi−ai), whichever of its faces are included).

[F22]

The Lebesgue integral is linear on L1 (The Lebesgue integral is linear on L1(μ)).

[F23]

Integrals are invariant under measure-preserving maps (Integral invariance under measure-preserving maps).

[F24]

Every countable subset of Rn, in particular {0}, is Lebesgue null (Every at most countable subset of Rn is Lebesgue null; in particular λ1(Q)=0).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F8F9F10F11F12F13F14F15casesalgebra

Put r=∣x∣ and ω=x/r for x≠0. On (0,∞) the power and logarithm profiles in [F1] are C2 by [F13]–[F15]; r=(∑kxk2)1/2 is C2 on the punctured space by [F8]–[F10]. The chain and product rules [F11]–[F15] give ∂iq(r)=q′(r)xi/r and ∂j∂iq(r)=q′′(r)xixj/r2+q′(r)(δij/r−xixj/r3). For n≥3 set cn=1/ωn−1; for n=2 set c2=1/(2π). In both cases q′=−cnr1−n and q′′=(n−1)cnr−n, hence ∂ijΦ(x)=cn∣x∣−nAij(ω) where Aij(ω)=nωiωj−δij. In particular cn>0 and this derivative is even under x↦−x.

1.2A1F18F19F20F21algebra

Fix ε>0 and let h(r)=1/r on (0,ε). For k≥1, put Ik=(ε2−k,ε21−k). Its length is ε2−k by [F21], and h(r)≥2k−1/ε on Ik, so [F18] gives ∫Ikh(r) dr≥1/2. The measure E↦∫Eh(r) dr is countably additive by [F19]–[F20]; the intervals are disjoint, so the integral over (0,ε) is at least m/2 for every finite union of the first m intervals. Letting m increase proves ∫0εdr/r=+∞. The interval-measure supplier uses the stated ACω assumption [A1].

2.1A1F2F3F5F6F7F18F22F23F25step 1.1algebra

On Sn−1, Aij is bounded and continuous. If i≠j, reflection of coordinate i preserves σ and sends Aij to −Aij, so [F23] gives ∫Aij dσ=0. If i=j, coordinate permutations make all ∫ωi2dσ equal; since ∑iωi2=1, linearity [F22] gives each value σ(Sn−1)/n and again ∫Aii dσ=0. For i=j, Aii(ei)=n−1>0 and Aii(ek)=−1<0 for k≠i; for i≠j, Aij((ei±ej)/2)=±n/2. Thus each sign occurs on a nonempty relative-open cap. Choose such a cap E={ω∈Sn−1:∣ω−ω0∣<η} small enough that one sign of Aij has magnitude greater than some c>0 throughout E. For 0<ρ<min⁡(1/8,η/8) and z∈B(ω0/2,ρ), one has 0<∣z∣<1 and ∣z/∣z∣−ω0∣≤∣1−2∣z∣∣+2∣z−ω0/2∣≤4ρ<η. Hence this Euclidean ball is contained in the cone {rω:ω∈E, 0<r≤1}. The positive ball measure [F5] and monotonicity applied to indicators [F18] give σ(E)>0 by [F2]. Since σ is finite by [F25], aij:=∫Sn−1∣Aij∣ dσ is finite and strictly positive, and the positive and negative angular parts each have positive integral.

3.1A1F4F6F7F16F17F24step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1algebra

Extend the formula in step 1.1 by setting its value at 0 to 0; [F24] makes this choice immaterial to its integral. The punctured space is open because it is the union of the open balls B(x,∣x∣/2) over x≠0 [F6], so {0} is closed. The extension is continuous on that open set. For every open V⊆R, its preimage is the open preimage under the restriction to Rn∖{0}, together with {0} exactly when 0∈V; thus it is Borel. Since open sets generate the Borel sigma-algebra [F7] and inverse images preserve sigma-algebra operations, the extension is Borel measurable. For Bε(0), [F4] and step 2.1 give ∫Bε(0)∣∂ijΦ(x)∣ dx=cnaij∫0εdrr=+∞ by step 1.2. Since cn>0 and aij>0, [F16] proves ∂ijΦ∉L1(Bε(0)) for every ε>0, and [F17] says it is not locally integrable at the pole. This uses ACω [A1] through the polar formula [F4].

3.2A1F4F5F16F19F21F22step 1.1step 2.1algebra

For 0<a<b<∞, the derivative in step 1.1 is integrable on the annulus a<∣x∣<b, since it is bounded there and the annulus has finite measure. Applying [F4] separately to its positive and negative parts and using [F19] and [F22], the signed integral equals cn∫abr−1dr∫Sn−1Aij(ω)dσ(ω)=0 by step 2.1. The radial integral is finite because 1/r is bounded on [a,b] and that interval has finite measure [F21]. Thus every concentric annular truncation cancels, although absolute integrability fails at the removed pole.

4.1A1F2F3F4F5F6F7F26F21F24step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1step 3.1step 3.2construct∎

Let f(y)=1B1(0)(y), a Borel bounded function with f(0)=1 by [F6]–[F7]. At x=0, evenness from step 1.1 and step 3.1 give ∫∣∂ijΦ(−y)f(y)∣dy=+∞. Write Aij+=max⁡(Aij,0) and Aij−=max⁡(−Aij,0). More specifically, [F4] on the positive and negative parts gives respectively cn(∫Sn−1Aij+ dσ)∫01drr=+∞,cn(∫Sn−1Aij− dσ)∫01drr=+∞, since both angular factors are positive by the sign caps in step 2.1 and the radial factor diverges by step 1.2. Each concentric annular truncation inside B1 has signed integral zero by step 3.2. Thus the ordinary Lebesgue integral is undefined there by [F26], and the formal absolute-convergence claim fails at a point where f is nonzero. Countable Choice [A1] is used only through the named measure suppliers [F2]–[F5], [F21], and [F24]; no full AC is invoked.

Source notes

Hunter §2.6.1, equation (2.14), prints the diagonal second-derivative formula; §2.7.1, Theorem 2.26, equations (2.25)–(2.28), subtracts f(x) and includes a boundary correction in the classical second-derivative integral formula. Teschl §5.3, equations (5.25)–(5.26), states all Cartesian second derivatives and their ∣x∣−n bound, and (5.28) gives the corresponding subtraction and boundary term for Hölder data. The present item derives a positive angular lower bound and a concrete bounded-data witness; the source's order estimate alone is not used as the lower-bound proof.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

118 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources