Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The truncated Riesz kernel is bounded on Lp of a bounded set

Statement

Assume Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Let n≥2, let z0∈Rn, ρ>0, and let Ω⊆B(z0,ρ) be measurable, 1≤p<∞ and f∈Lp(Ω;K). Then ∥∫Ω∣x−y∣1−n∣f(y)∣ dy∥Lp(Ω)≤C(n) ρ ∥f∥Lp(Ω). In particular, for a bounded John domain the John condition gives diam⁡Ω≤c∣Ω∣1/n, so the bound holds with coefficient C(n,cJ)∣Ω∣1/n.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice; n≥2; z0∈Rn, ρ>0; a measurable Ω⊆B(z0,ρ); 1≤p<∞; f∈Lp(Ω;K); and, for the final claim, a bounded John domain Ω with distinguished point x0 and admissible constant cJ≥1.

[F1]

The polar surface measure is σ(E)=nλn({rω:ω∈E, 0<r≤1}) on Borel E⊆Sn−1 (The polar surface set function on the unit sphere).

[F2]

Polar coordinates: ∫Rnh dλn=∫0∞∫Sn−1h(rω)rn−1 dσ(ω) dr for nonnegative Borel h (Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma).

[F3]

Every Euclidean ball has positive finite Lebesgue measure (Euclidean balls have positive finite Lebesgue measure).

[F4]

Minkowski's integral inequality: ∥∫Y∣F(⋅,y)∣ dν(y)∥Lp(X)≤∫Y∥F(⋅,y)∥Lp(X) dν(y) for measurable F with the right side finite (Minkowski's integral inequality).

[F5]

Tonelli-Fubini on completed sigma-finite products gives measurability and equality of the nonnegative iterated integrals (Tonelli and Fubini for the completed product, with only almost-everywhere section measurability). Lebesgue translation invariance gives ∥g(⋅−z)∥p=∥g∥p (Lebesgue outer measure, Lebesgue measurability and Lebesgue measure are unchanged by translation).

[F6]

A measure is countably additive on pairwise disjoint measurable sets, and monotone under inclusion (Measures on sigma-algebras, Measures are monotone).

[F7]

A John domain with admissible constant cJ and point x0 admits, for every x∈Ω, a curve from x to x0 with dist⁡(γ(t),∂Ω)≥cJ−1∣x−γ(t)∣ (John domains and the John constant).

[F9]

Measurability is preimage measurability, and Lp consists of almost-everywhere classes of measurable functions with finite norm (A measurable function between measurable spaces, The space Lp(μ) as the quotient by null functions).

[F10]

Countable Choice, used by the cited measure-theoretic interfaces (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F11]

Under Countable Choice, every completion-measurable real function has a base-measurable representative equal to it almost everywhere (A function measurable for a completion is almost everywhere equal to one measurable for the original sigma-algebra); Lebesgue measure is the completion of Borel Lebesgue measure (L(Rn) is exactly the completion of the restriction of λn to the Borel sets). Applying this componentwise gives a finite Borel representative of every Lp(Rn;K) class.

[F12]

Under Countable Choice, reflection in the origin preserves Lebesgue measurability and measure (For a nonzero real c, dilation by c multiplies Lebesgue outer measure by ∣c∣n, and reflection in the origin preserves it).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F2F3F10algebra

The truncated kernel has finite mass. Put k(z):=∣z∣1−n1B(0,2ρ)(z) for z≠0 and k(0):=0. By [F2] applied to the nonnegative Borel function k and by [F1], [F3], ∥k∥L1(Rn)=∫Sn−1∫02ρt1−ntn−1 dt dσ(ω)=2ρ σ(Sn−1)=2ρ n λn(B(0,1))=:C0(n)ρ, so ∥k∥1 is finite and equals a dimension-only multiple of ρ.

1.2F2F6F7algebra

John-domain volume control. Put a:=dist⁡(x0,∂Ω)>0. The ball B(x0,a) lies in Ω: a segment from x0 to any point outside Ω first meets the boundary, so an outside point cannot be closer than a. Polar coordinates [F2] therefore give ∣Ω∣≥σ(Sn−1)an/n. Evaluating [F7] at the endpoint of the curve gives ∣x−x0∣≤cJa for every x∈Ω, hence diam⁡Ω≤2cJa≤2cJ(n/σ(Sn−1))1/n∣Ω∣1/n.

2.1F2F3F4F5F11F12step 1.1algebra

The convolution bound. For g∈Lp(Rn;K), choose a finite Borel representative g0 by [F11] (replace any infinite values on a Borel null set by zero). The function F0(x,z)=k(z)g0(x−z) is Borel, hence measurable for the product of the Lebesgue sigma-algebras. The two Lebesgue spaces are sigma-finite, being exhausted by bounded balls of finite measure [F2, F3]. Translation invariance [F5] and step 1.1 give ∫∥F0(⋅,z)∥p dz=∫k(z)∥g0(⋅−z)∥p dz=∥k∥1∥g∥p<∞. Minkowski [F4] therefore shows that the absolute integral is finite almost everywhere and ∥Tg0∥p≤∥k∥1∥g∥p, where Tg0(x)=∫k(z)g0(x−z) dz. This also defines Tg for any Lebesgue representative g: for each fixed x, the exceptional set of z is the translate and reflection x−N of the null set N where g≠g0, and has measure zero by reflection invariance [F12] and translation invariance [F5]. Thus the section integrals agree wherever finite, and the measurable almost-everywhere representative Tg0 supplies ∥Tg∥p≤∥k∥1∥g∥p.

2.2step 1.2algebra

In particular step 1.2 gives diam⁡Ω≤2c(n,cJ)∣Ω∣1/n with c(n,cJ):=cJ(n/σ(Sn−1))1/n; taking a supremum does not require that a farthest point exist.

3.1F5F9F12step 2.1givenalgebra

The bound on Ω for a set inside a ball. Extend f by zero to Rn and put g:=∣f∣1Ω, a measurable function with ∥g∥Lp(Rn)=∥f∥Lp(Ω) by [F9]. By translation and reflection invariance [F5, F12], the substitution y=x−z gives Tg(x)=∫k(x−y)g(y) dy wherever finite. Since x,y∈Ω⊆B(z0,ρ) implies ∣x−y∣≤2ρ, for almost every x∈Ω one has Tg(x)=∫Ω∣x−y∣1−n∣f(y)∣ dy: the kernel truncation in the convolution is inactive exactly on the pairs with ∣x−y∣<2ρ. Hence, by step 2.1, ∥∫Ω∣x−y∣1−n∣f(y)∣ dy∥Lp(Ω)≤∥Tg∥Lp(Rn)≤∥k∥L1∥f∥Lp(Ω)≤C(n)ρ∥f∥Lp(Ω).

4.1step 3.1step 2.2algebra∎

The John-domain form of the bound. Apply step 3.1 with z0:=x0 and ρ:=2c(n,cJ)∣Ω∣1/n, which is admissible by step 2.2 because then Ω⊆B(x0,ρ). The resulting coefficient is C(n)ρ=C(n,cJ)∣Ω∣1/n.

Source notes

Kinnunen proves Lemma 5.15 by Holder and Fubini, using the kernel integral estimate of Lemma 5.14; the proof above instead uses Minkowski's integral inequality for the truncated radial kernel, which gives the bound on every Lp with the single constant ∥k∥1=C(n)ρ and avoids interpolation. The John-domain volume estimate follows from the interior ball at the distinguished point and the endpoint John inequality.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

102 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources