Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A function measurable for a completion is almost everywhere equal to one measurable for the original sigma-algebra

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice. Let (X,A0,μ) be a measure space and let (X,A0,μ) be its completion. If f:XR is measurable with respect to A0, then there is an A0-measurable function g:XR such that f=g almost everywhere.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Countable Choice, a measure space (X,A0,μ), its completion (X,A0,μ), and an A0-measurable function f:XR.

[L1]

Every measurable function admits simple approximations dominated by its absolute value. (Every measurable function admits simple approximations dominated by its absolute value)

[L2]

A completed measurable set has the form AN with AA0 and N contained in a measurable null set. (The completion domain and proposed completed set function of a measure space)

[L3]

Assuming Countable Choice, the completion is a complete measure space extending the original measure, and countable unions of completed null sets are completed null sets. (Assuming countable choice, every measure space has a unique complete extension to its completion, Null sets are closed under countable unions and, in a complete space, under arbitrary subsets)

[L4]

Pointwise limsup of a sequence of measurable functions is measurable. (Sequential suprema, infima, limsup, liminf, and pointwise limits of measurable functions are measurable)

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

By [L1], choose simple A0-measurable functions [L1, choose] sk:XR with skf and sk(x)f(x) for every xX. Write the canonical representation of sk as

sk=j=1mkck,j1Ek,j,

where the Ek,j are pairwise disjoint completed measurable level sets. [L1, choose]

1.2

For each pair (k,j), apply [L2] to Ek,j and choose [L2, L3, choose] Ak,jA0 together with a completed null set Nk,j such that Ek,j=Ak,jMk,j with Mk,jNk,j. Because Ak,jEk,j, the sets Ak,j remain pairwise disjoint. Define

tk:=j=1mkck,j1Ak,j.

Then each tk is A0-measurable and simple. Let N:=k,jNk,j. By [L3], N is a completed measurable null set, and for every xN one has tk(x)=sk(x) for all k. [L2, L3, choose]

2.1

Define

step 1.1step 1.2L4

g:=lim supktk.

By [L4], the function g is A0-measurable. If xN, then step 1.2 gives tk(x)=sk(x) for every k, and step 1.1 gives sk(x)f(x), so g(x)=lim supktk(x)=limksk(x)=f(x). Hence g=f on XN. [step 1.1, step 1.2, L4]

3.1

The null set N is measurable in the completion by [L3], so step 2.1 says [step 2.1, L3] exactly that f=g almost everywhere. Since g is A0-measurable, it is the required base-measurable representative.

step 2.1L3

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

19 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources