How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Young's convolution inequality
Statement
Let satisfy
If and , then the convolution is defined almost everywhere and satisfies
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Exponents as displayed and functions , .
The convolution bound is available (If , then exists almost everywhere, belongs to , and ).
Holder's inequality and generalized Holder are available (Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases, Generalized Holder inequality puts products into , Conjugate exponents, including the endpoint conventions).
Minkowski's integral inequality is available (Minkowski's integral inequality).
Proof
If , then , so is conjugate to . For every , [L2, given, algebra] [L2] gives Hence .
Assume . If , interpret the factor [L2, given, algebra] as and the exponent as ; likewise, if , interpret as and as . With this endpoint convention, generalized Holder from [L2] applies to the three factors with exponents because their reciprocals sum to . This yields
Integrate the inequality from step 1.2 in . Tonelli on the nonnegative [L1, L3, step 1.1, step 1.2, algebra] right-hand side gives Taking th roots proves the finite- case. Together with step 1.1, this is Young's inequality.
Depends on
- If $f,g \in L^1(\mathbb{R}^n)$, then $f*g$ exists almost everywhere, belongs to $L^1$, and $\|f*g\|_1 \le \|f\|_1 \|g\|_1$
- Minkowski's integral inequality
- Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases
- Generalized Holder inequality puts products into $L^r$
- Conjugate exponents, including the endpoint conventions
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
19 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Richard L. Wheeden and Antoni Zygmund, Measure and Integral: An Introduction to Real Analysis (standard reference, not scraped)