How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The heat Cauchy problem for data
Statement
Assume Countable Choice, let and . For every the heat evolution of The heat evolution of initial data satisfies: (i) as ; (ii) for every ; (iii) the semigroup law on for all , with the identity.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice, , , , and .
Countable Choice is the hypothesis carried by the integration and approximate-identity suppliers below (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
For and , is the class of , defined almost everywhere, each is complex-linear, and is the identity on (The heat evolution of initial data).
For every the kernel satisfies and the family is an approximate identity (Normalisation, parabolic scaling, heat equation and derivative bounds for the heat kernel).
For all , as functions on , the convolution converging absolutely everywhere (The heat kernel semigroup identity ).
Assume countable choice; if is an approximate identity and with , then as (Every approximate identity converges to the identity in for ).
Assume Countable Choice; for with , convolution gives (Young's convolution inequality under Countable Choice).
On sigma-finite product spaces, Tonelli's theorem holds for nonnegative product-measurable functions and Fubini's theorem for functions (Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product, Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product); the Lebesgue measure on is the completed product of two copies of (The Euclidean Lebesgue measure is the completion of the product of the factor Lebesgue measures).
Proof
Contraction: by [F1] the class is represented by the convolution , so Young's inequality [F5] with the exponent triple , which satisfies , gives by [F2]; at , has the same norm.
Strong convergence at time zero: by [F2] the family is an approximate identity, so the published approximate-identity theorem [F4] gives as ; by [F1] the class is exactly the class of , so , which is (i).
Semigroup law: assume first and put , a representative of defined for almost every by [F1]. For fixed consider the nonnegative function on ; by the identification of [F6] and Tonelli's theorem, its iterated integral equals , and the inner integral is by [F3], so the whole integral is , finite for almost every because and Young's inequality [F5] applies. Hence the signed double integral is absolutely convergent, Fubini [F6] applies, and for almost every ; that is, . If or the identity is the operator identity of [F1], so the semigroup law holds for all , which is (iii).
Steps 1.1, 2.1 and 2.2 prove the contraction bound (ii), the strong convergence (i) and the semigroup law (iii) for every , , which is the whole statement.
Depends on
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- The heat evolution $H_t$ of initial data
- Normalisation, parabolic scaling, heat equation and derivative bounds for the heat kernel
- The heat kernel semigroup identity $\Gamma_t*\Gamma_s=\Gamma_{t+s}$
- The Euclidean Lebesgue measure is the completion of the product of the factor Lebesgue measures
- Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product
- Every $L^1$ approximate identity converges to the identity in $L^p$ for $1 \le p < \infty$
- Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product
- Young's convolution inequality under Countable Choice
Used by
- Monotonicity and Lᵖ contractivity of the heat flow Corollary
- The heat flow need not converge in supremum norm Counterexample
- The heat flow of an interval indicator is a difference of Gaussian tails Example
- Heat generator at zero on compactly supported smooth data Lemma
- Uniqueness of strongly continuous mild heat solutions Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
58 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John K. Hunter, Notes on Partial Differential Equations (revised 18 June 2014, UC Davis) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Gerald Teschl, Partial Differential Equations: From Classical to Modern (2025 archived author manuscript, AMS Graduate Studies in Mathematics) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Victor Ivrii, Partial Differential Equations (University of Toronto, 2018, CC BY-SA) (standard reference, not scraped)