Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourcedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The heat Cauchy problem for bounded uniformly continuous data

Statement

Assume Countable Choice and let n≥1, and let u0:Rn→C be bounded and uniformly continuous. Define u(x,t):=∫RnΓ(x−y,t)u0(y) dy for t>0 and u(x,0):=u0(x). Then u is C∞ on Rn×(0,∞), satisfies ∂tu=Δxu there, is bounded with ∥u(⋅,t)∥∞≤∥u0∥∞, and converges locally uniformly at the initial time: sup⁡x∈K∣u(x,t)−u0(x)∣→0 as t↓0+ for every compact K⊆Rn.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, n≥1, a bounded uniformly continuous u0:Rn→C, a multi-index α, an integer k≥0, and 0<τ<T with K⊆Rn compact.

[A1]

Countable Choice is the hypothesis carried by the differentiation and integration suppliers below (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

For p=∞ the heat evolution Ht of The heat evolution Ht of initial data is defined on bounded measurable data g by the everywhere absolutely convergent integral (Htg)(x)=∫RnΓ(x−y,t)g(y) dy, with ∥Htg∥∞≤∥g∥∞, and H0g=g.

[F2]

For every t>0 the kernel is C∞ with ∂tΓ=ΔxΓ, for every multi-index β there is Cn,β<∞ with ∣DβΓ(z,t)∣≤Cn,βt−(n+∣β∣)/2e−∣z∣2/(8t), the unit-mass identity ∫Γ(z,t) dz=1 holds, and for every δ>0 ∫∣z∣>δΓ(z,t) dz→0 as t↓0+ (Normalisation, parabolic scaling, heat equation and derivative bounds for the heat kernel).

[F3]

For f∈Lp, 1≤p≤∞, the absolutely convergent heat convolution is C∞ in space and time for t>0, every derivative passes through the integral, and ut=Δxu (Spatial and time derivatives pass through heat convolution for positive time).

[F4]

If (Kε) is an L1 approximate identity and g is bounded and continuous, then (g∗Kε)(x)→g(x) uniformly on compact sets (L1 approximate identities converge uniformly on compacta for bounded continuous functions).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1A1F1F2given

Work under [A1] and put M:=∥u0∥∞<∞. For every x and t>0 the integral defining u(x,t) is absolutely convergent with ∣u(x,t)∣≤M∫Γ(x−y,t) dy=M by unit mass [F2], so u is a bounded function with ∥u(⋅,t)∥∞≤M=∥u0∥∞ and u(⋅,0)=u0 by the definition of H0 in [F1].

2.1step 1.1F3given

Since u0 is bounded and measurable, it represents an L∞ class. Applying [F3] with p=∞ gives the C∞ representative u on Rn×(0,∞) and the heat equation ∂tu=Δxu.

3.1step 2.1F2F4given

Initial convergence: by the evenness of Γ(⋅,t) in its first argument, u(x,t)=∫RnΓ(x−y,t)u0(y) dy=∫RnΓ(y−x,t)u0(y) dy=(u0∗Γt)(x) for every t>0; the datum u0 is bounded and continuous and the family (Γt)t>0 is an L1 approximate identity by [F2], so the published approximate-identity corollary [F4] gives sup⁡x∈K∣u(x,t)−u0(x)∣→0 as t↓0+ for every compact K⊆Rn, which is the asserted local uniform convergence.

4.1step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1given∎

Steps 1.1, 2.1 and 3.1 prove boundedness with the stated sup-norm bound, C∞ smoothness and the heat equation at positive time, and locally uniform recovery of the initial datum, which is the whole statement.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

40 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources