Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Spatial and time derivatives pass through heat convolution for positive time

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Let n≥1, 1≤p≤∞, and f∈Lp(Rn) (bounded measurable data are included). The absolutely convergent representative u(x,t)=∫RnΓ(x−y,t)f(y) dy is C∞ for t>0, and for every multi-index α and k≥0 Dxα∂tku=(Dxα∂tkΓt)∗f. Moreover ∣Dxα∂tkΓ(x,t)∣≤Cn,α,kt−(n+∣α∣+2k)/2e−∣x∣2/(8t). Domination is uniform on compact subsets x∈K, τ≤t≤T with 0<τ<T<∞; ut=Δu.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, n≥1, 1≤p≤∞, f∈Lp(Rn), a multi-index α, an integer k≥0, and 0<τ<T with K⊆Rn compact.

[A1]

Countable Choice is the hypothesis carried by the differentiation and integration suppliers below (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

For 1≤p≤∞ and f∈Lp(Rn) the heat evolution Htf is the Lp class of x↦∫RnΓ(x−y,t)f(y) dy, defined almost everywhere with the contraction bound ∥Htf∥p≤∥f∥p (The heat evolution Ht of initial data).

[F2]

For every t>0 the kernel is C∞ on Rn×(0,∞), satisfies ∂tΓ=ΔxΓ, and for every multi-index β there is Cn,β<∞ with ∣DβΓ(z,t)∣≤Cn,βt−(n+∣β∣)/2e−∣z∣2/(8t); also ∫RnΓ(z,t) dz=1 (Normalisation, parabolic scaling, heat equation and derivative bounds for the heat kernel).

[F3]

A C2 function on an open set has equal mixed partials, ∂i∂jϕ=∂j∂iϕ (Clairaut--Schwarz theorem for continuous second partial derivatives).

[F4]

If fk→f almost everywhere and ∣fk∣≤g almost everywhere with g integrable, then ∫fk→∫f (Dominated convergence).

[F5]

For conjugate exponents p,q∈[1,∞] and measurable F,G with F∈Lp, G∈Lq, the product is integrable and ∫∣FG∣≤∥F∥p∥G∥q (Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases).

[F6]

Let I be an open interval and F:X×I→C satisfy: for each t∈I, x↦F(x,t) is integrable; for almost every x, t↦F(x,t) is differentiable; the t-derivative is measurable in x; and the derivative is dominated by one integrable function of x uniformly in t. Then t↦∫F(x,t) dx is differentiable on I with derivative ∫∂tF(x,t) dx (Differentiation under the integral sign).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1A1F1F2F3givenalgebra

Work under [A1]; let u(x,t)=∫RnΓ(x−y,t)f(y) dy be the everywhere-defined representative of the evolution Htf of [F1]. Kernel derivatives and their Lp′ bounds: by [F2] the identity ∂tΓ=ΔxΓ holds on Rn×(0,∞), and Γ is C∞, so Clairaut–Schwarz [F3] lets the time and space derivatives be interchanged; iterating the heat equation gives ∂tkΓ=ΔxkΓ and therefore Dxα∂tkΓ=ΔxkDxαΓ, a finite sum of terms DβΓ with ∣β∣=∣α∣+2k, so [F2] yields ∣Dxα∂tkΓ(x,t)∣≤Cn,α,kt−(n+∣α∣+2k)/2e−∣x∣2/(8t) for a finite constant. Writing p′ for the conjugate exponent and m:=∣α∣+2k, for 1<p≤∞ (so p′<∞) the function z↦e−p′∣z∣2/(8t) is e−∣z∣2/(4t′)=(4πt′)n/2Γ(z,t′) with t′=2t/p′, so its integral is (4πt′)n/2=(8πt/p′)n/2 by unit mass in [F2], while for p=1 the function z↦e−∣z∣2/(8t) is bounded by 1; in every case Dxα∂tkΓ(⋅,t)∈Lp′ with norm at most Cn,α,kt−(n+m)/2(8πt/p′)n/(2p′) when p>1, and at most Cn,α,kt−(n+m)/2 when p=1.

2.1step 1.1F5givenalgebra

Absolute convergence and compact domination: fix x∈Rn and t>0; by Hölder [F5] and step 1.1, ∫∣Dxα∂tkΓ(x−y,t)f(y)∣ dy≤∥Dxα∂tkΓ(⋅,t)∥p′∥f∥p<∞, so every derivative integral converges absolutely and defines uαk(x,t):=∫Dxα∂tkΓ(x−y,t)f(y) dy. If K⊆BR and 0<τ≤t≤T, then ∣x−y∣2≥∣y∣2/2−R2 gives ∣Dxα∂tkΓ(x−y,t)∣≤Cn,α,kτ−(n+m)/2eR2/(8τ)e−∣y∣2/(16T) for every x∈K and t∈[τ,T], an x-independent, t-independent bound whose product with ∣f∣ is integrable by [F5] because the Gaussian e−∣y∣2/(16T) is in every Lq.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1F4F6given

Differentiation under the integral sign: for fixed x apply [F6] on any open parameter interval I=(τ,T) with 0<τ<T to F(y,t)=Γ(x−y,t)f(y), whose t-derivative is dominated uniformly on I by the integrable function from step 2.1 with α=0,k=1; this gives ∂tu(x,t)=∫∂tΓ(x−y,t)f(y) dy, and the same argument with ∂xi in place of ∂t gives ∂xiu(x,t)=∫∂xiΓ(x−y,t)f(y) dy. Reapplying [F6] to the resulting integral representations, whose integrands are dominated on each compact set exactly as in step 2.1 for the next multi-index, produces every mixed derivative Dxα∂tku as the corresponding convolution integral; the domination of step 2.1 is uniform in (x,t) on K×[τ,T], and dominated convergence [F4] makes each such integral a continuous function of (x,t) there, so u is C∞ on Rn×(0,∞) and Dxα∂tku=(Dxα∂tkΓt)∗f.

4.1step 3.1F2givenalgebra

Heat equation: by step 3.1 with α=0, k=1 and with the spatial derivatives, ∂tu=(∂tΓt)∗f and Δxu=(ΔxΓt)∗f; the kernel identity ∂tΓ=ΔxΓ of [F2] makes the two convolution integrands equal, so ∂tu=Δxu on Rn×(0,∞).

5.1step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1given∎

Steps 1.1 and 2.1 give the derivative bounds of the kernel, absolute convergence of the representative and the uniform compact domination; steps 3.1 and 4.1 give the C∞ property, the derivative identity Dxα∂tku=(Dxα∂tkΓt)∗f and the heat equation ut=Δu, which is the whole statement.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

49 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources