How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Heat generator at zero on compactly supported smooth data
Statement
Assume Countable Choice. For , and , as .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice, , , , and .
Countable Choice is the hypothesis carried by the differentiation, integration and evolution suppliers below (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
is the test-function space of Test function space d of an open set; and every derivative of it is smooth with compact support, so and in particular . In this item denotes the evolution of the class as in The heat evolution of initial data.
For the function is on and every spatial and time derivative passes through the convolution, (Spatial and time derivatives pass through heat convolution for positive time).
The kernel satisfies on (Normalisation, parabolic scaling, heat equation and derivative bounds for the heat kernel).
For continuous on differentiable on with , Riemann integrable there, (Integration by parts for continuous factors with Riemann-integrable extensions of their interior derivatives).
If is continuous on , differentiable on and is Riemann integrable, then (Newton–Leibniz needs only continuity on , differentiability on , and a Riemann-integrable extension of the interior derivative).
For and , as , and (The heat Cauchy problem for data).
Let and let be measurable with ; then (Minkowski's integral inequality).
Bounded uniformly continuous data are recovered locally uniformly at by their heat convolution (The heat Cauchy problem for bounded uniformly continuous data). This applies to both and , which are smooth with compact support.
Proof
Derivative identity: fix and . By [F2] with , and the function is differentiable with ; by [F3] and , applying the scalar integration by parts [F4] twice in each coordinate (the boundary terms vanish because has compact support, and this works for every including ) turns the last integral into ; hence for every and .
Newton–Leibniz: by step 1.1 the map is continuous on with derivative on , for its real and imaginary parts separately; the fundamental theorem [F5] applied on gives for every .
Both and hold at every by [F8]. Thus the integrand in step 2.1 extends continuously to , and letting gives . Dividing by and subtracting yields . The integrand is jointly continuous for by [F2] applied to , hence measurable as required for [F7].
bound and limit: applying the Minkowski integral inequality [F7] to on — whose hypothesis holds because by the contraction clause of [F6] — gives . Given , the strong convergence clause of [F6] applied to supplies with for every ; for every the right-hand side is then at most . Hence as .
Steps 1.1, 2.1, 3.1 and 4.1 prove the stated generator limit for compactly supported smooth data in every , .
Depends on
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- The heat evolution $H_t$ of initial data
- Test function space d of an open set
- Normalisation, parabolic scaling, heat equation and derivative bounds for the heat kernel
- Spatial and time derivatives pass through heat convolution for positive time
- The heat Cauchy problem for $L^p$ data
- The heat Cauchy problem for bounded uniformly continuous data
- Integration by parts for continuous factors with Riemann-integrable extensions of their interior derivatives
- Minkowski's integral inequality
- Newton–Leibniz needs only continuity on $[a,b]$, differentiability on $(a,b)$, and a Riemann-integrable extension of the interior derivative
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
51 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John K. Hunter, Notes on Partial Differential Equations (revised 18 June 2014, UC Davis) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Jared Speck, MIT 18.152 Introduction to Partial Differential Equations, Class Meeting #5: The Fundamental Solution for the Heat Equation (Fall 2011) (standard reference, not scraped)