How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Spatial derivative estimates for the heat flow
Statement
Assume Countable Choice, let , , and let and the constants be as in to smoothing estimate for the heat flow. For every multi-index , every and every , the function is on , with as an absolutely convergent integral, and
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice, , with exponent determined by , a multi-index , and .
Countable Choice is the hypothesis carried by the convolution and integration suppliers below (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
For every : is smooth, unit mass holds, for every , and for every multi-index ; moreover (Normalisation, parabolic scaling, heat equation and derivative bounds for the heat kernel).
has the everywhere-defined absolutely convergent representative , which is in , and for every multi-index (Spatial and time derivatives pass through heat convolution for positive time).
For with and , , (Young's convolution inequality under Countable Choice).
With as in the statement, and the kernel estimate holds ( to smoothing estimate for the heat flow); the exponent range makes .
Proof
Smoothness and derivative identity: by [F2] the representative is in for and is the class of , an absolutely convergent integral by the derivative bounds of [F1] together with Hölder and .
Scaling of the derivative kernel norms: by the derivative scaling identity of [F1], ; for , substituting gives , hence . For , taking essential suprema in the same scaling identity gives , the same formula with . The constant is finite because by [F1] and the Gaussian lies in every , .
Young estimate for the derivative: applying Young's convolution inequality [F3] with the exponent triple , admissible because , gives , and step 2.1 together with the identity from [F4] turns this into , which is the stated estimate.
Steps 1.1, 2.1 and 3.1 prove the smoothness of the representative, the absolutely convergent convolution formula for and the displayed derivative estimate with finite constant .
Depends on
- $C^k$ maps and multi-index derivative notation in Euclidean space
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- The heat evolution $H_t$ of initial data
- Normalisation, parabolic scaling, heat equation and derivative bounds for the heat kernel
- Spatial and time derivatives pass through heat convolution for positive time
- $L^p$ to $L^q$ smoothing estimate for the heat flow
- Young's convolution inequality under Countable Choice
Used by
- The heat flow need not converge in supremum norm Counterexample
Dependency tree · two levels
46 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John K. Hunter, Notes on Partial Differential Equations (revised 18 June 2014, UC Davis) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Jared Speck, MIT 18.152 Introduction to Partial Differential Equations, Class Meeting #5: The Fundamental Solution for the Heat Equation (Fall 2011) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Gerald Teschl, Partial Differential Equations: From Classical to Modern (2025 archived author manuscript, AMS Graduate Studies in Mathematics) (standard reference, not scraped)