How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
L1 in time estimate for Lp Duhamel forcing
Statement
Assume Countable Choice. Let , and let be strongly measurable with . For every the Bochner integral exists and satisfies . For no strong continuity of at zero on all is asserted. For merely weakly measurable forcing this statement makes no existence assertion.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice, , a strongly measurable with , and .
Countable Choice is the ambient hypothesis (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
Strong measurability: there are measurable simple functions and a null set with for every (Strongly measurable Banach-valued function).
For the heat flow is strongly continuous at zero, so and as ; and for all and (The heat Cauchy problem for data, Monotonicity and contractivity of the heat flow).
The kernel satisfies for all (Normalisation, parabolic scaling, heat equation and derivative bounds for the heat kernel), and there.
Dominated convergence (Dominated convergence), Young's inequality (Young's convolution inequality under Countable Choice).
The heat potential is defined as the Bochner integral once the integrand is Bochner integrable, the criterion being strong measurability together with finiteness of the integral of the norm (The Duhamel heat potential, Bochner integrability criterion).
is complete for under Countable Choice (Riesz-Fischer completeness of for ), so these Bochner integrals have Banach-space targets.
Proof
Given: Countable Choice, , a strongly measurable with , and .
Let . The map is jointly norm continuous on : by [F2], and the second term tends to as by strong continuity at zero applied to the semigroup difference. If are the simple approximations of [F1], the functions are strongly measurable: for each of the finitely many values of , the continuous curve on is uniformly approximated by finite-valued mesh functions; multiply these approximations by the measurable level-set indicators of and add them, Choosing mesh error at most for the finitely many curves associated with yields a single sequence of finite-valued measurable approximations; contractions and show that this sequence converges pointwise off the original null set to . This proves strong measurability directly from [F1].
Let and let . For fixed and , [F3], [F4] and give with , so is norm continuous on by [F4] (Young's inequality with ); consequently is jointly norm continuous on and the argument of step 1.1 makes strongly measurable on . Take the countable exhaustion , . For each simple approximation , approximate its finitely many continuous flow curves uniformly on these intervals by finite mesh functions. On the -th interval choose error at most and set the approximation to zero on the omitted tail. At every off the original null set, these finite-valued measurable functions tend to , because contractions also give . The single endpoint has measure zero. This proves strong measurability on directly from [F1].
In both cases the contraction bound [F2] gives , so ; the Bochner integrability criterion [F5] therefore makes a well-defined element of , and the norm inequality for Bochner integrals Bochner integral norm inequality gives .
The construction claims no continuity of the integrand at nor of at zero when : strong measurability of the integrand, which is all that integrability needs, was proved only up to null sets; and for forcing that is merely weakly measurable, no strong measurability of is available, so no existence of the Bochner integral is asserted in that case. This proves the theorem with the stated caveats.
Depends on
- Riesz-Fischer completeness of $L^p$ for $1 \le p \le \infty$
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- The Duhamel heat potential
- Bochner integrability criterion
- Bochner integral norm inequality
- Monotonicity and $L^p$ contractivity of the heat flow
- The heat Cauchy problem for $L^p$ data
- Normalisation, parabolic scaling, heat equation and derivative bounds for the heat kernel
- Dominated convergence
- Young's convolution inequality under Countable Choice
- Strongly measurable Banach-valued function
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
71 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.