Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

L1 in time estimate for Lp Duhamel forcing

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Let 1≤p≤∞, and let f:[0,T]→Lp(Rn) be strongly measurable with ∫0T∥f(s)∥p ds<∞. For every t the Bochner integral Df(t)=∫0tHt−sf(s) ds exists and satisfies ∥Df(t)∥p≤∫0t∥f(s)∥p ds. For p=∞ no strong continuity of H at zero on all L∞ is asserted. For merely weakly measurable L∞ forcing this statement makes no existence assertion.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, 1≤p≤∞, a strongly measurable f:[0,T]→Lp(Rn) with ∫0T∥f(s)∥p ds<∞, and 0<t≤T.

[A1]

Countable Choice is the ambient hypothesis (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

Strong measurability: there are measurable simple functions sk and a null set N with ∥sk(ω)−f(ω)∥→0 for every ω∉N (Strongly measurable Banach-valued function).

[F2]

For 1≤p<∞ the heat flow is strongly continuous at zero, so Ht+s=HtHs and ∥Hτg−g∥p→0 as τ↓0; and ∥Hτg∥p≤∥g∥p for all p and τ≥0 (The heat Cauchy problem for Lp data, Monotonicity and Lp contractivity of the heat flow).

[F3]

The kernel satisfies ∣DxαΓ(x,τ)∣≤Cn,ατ−(∣α∣+n)/2e−∣x∣2/(8τ) for all τ>0 (Normalisation, parabolic scaling, heat equation and derivative bounds for the heat kernel), and ∂τΓ=ΔxΓ there.

[F4]

Dominated convergence (Dominated convergence), Young's inequality ∥K∗g∥q≤∥K∥1∥g∥q (Young's convolution inequality under Countable Choice).

[F5]

The heat potential Df(t) is defined as the Bochner integral ∫0tHt−sf(s) ds once the integrand is Bochner integrable, the criterion being strong measurability together with finiteness of the integral of the norm (The Duhamel heat potential, Bochner integrability criterion).

[F6]

Lp is complete for 1≤p≤∞ under Countable Choice (Riesz-Fischer completeness of Lp for 1≤p≤∞), so these Bochner integrals have Banach-space targets.

Proof

Given: Countable Choice, 1≤p≤∞, a strongly measurable f:[0,T]→Lp(Rn) with ∫0T∥f(s)∥p ds<∞, and 0<t≤T.

1.1A1F1F2given

Let 1≤p<∞. The map Φ(s,g):=Ht−sg is jointly norm continuous on [0,t]×Lp(Rn): ∥Ht−sg−Ht−s′g′∥p≤∥g−g′∥p+∥(Ht−s−Ht−s′)g′∥p by [F2], and the second term tends to 0 as s→s′ by strong continuity at zero applied to the semigroup difference. If fk are the simple approximations of [F1], the functions s↦Φ(s,fk(s)) are strongly measurable: for each of the finitely many values g of fk, the continuous curve s↦Ht−sg on [0,t] is uniformly approximated by finite-valued mesh functions; multiply these approximations by the measurable level-set indicators of fk and add them, Choosing mesh error at most 1/k for the finitely many curves associated with fk yields a single sequence of finite-valued measurable approximations; contractions and fk→f show that this sequence converges pointwise off the original null set to Ht−sf(s). This proves strong measurability directly from [F1].

2.1A1F1F3F4given

Let p=∞ and let 0<δ<t. For fixed g∈L∞(Rn) and δ≤τ,τ′≤t, [F3], [F4] and ∂τΓ=ΔΓ give ∥Γτ−Γτ′∥1≤∫01∥∂τΓτ′+u(τ−τ′)∥1du ∣τ−τ′∣≤Cδ∣τ−τ′∣ with Cδ<∞, so τ↦Hτg is norm continuous on [δ,t] by [F4] (Young's inequality with ∥K∥1); consequently Φ is jointly norm continuous on [0,t−δ]×L∞ and the argument of step 1.1 makes s↦Ht−sf(s) strongly measurable on [0,t−δ]. Take the countable exhaustion [0,t−t/(m+1)], m≥1. For each simple approximation fk, approximate its finitely many continuous flow curves uniformly on these intervals by finite mesh functions. On the k-th interval choose error at most 1/k and set the approximation to zero on the omitted tail. At every s<t off the original null set, these finite-valued measurable functions tend to Ht−sf(s), because contractions also give ∥Ht−s(fk(s)−f(s))∥∞≤∥fk(s)−f(s)∥∞. The single endpoint has measure zero. This proves strong measurability on [0,t] directly from [F1].

3.1step 1.1step 2.1F2F5F6given

In both cases the contraction bound [F2] gives ∥Ht−sf(s)∥p≤∥f(s)∥p, so ∫0t∥Ht−sf(s)∥p ds≤∫0t∥f(s)∥p ds≤∫0T∥f(s)∥p ds<∞; the Bochner integrability criterion [F5] therefore makes Df(t)=∫0tHt−sf(s) ds a well-defined element of Lp(Rn), and the norm inequality for Bochner integrals Bochner integral norm inequality gives ∥Df(t)∥p≤∫0t∥f(s)∥p ds.

4.1step 3.1given∎

The construction claims no continuity of the integrand at s=t nor of H at zero when p=∞: strong measurability of the integrand, which is all that integrability needs, was proved only up to null sets; and for forcing that is merely weakly measurable, no strong measurability of s↦Ht−sf(s) is available, so no existence of the Bochner integral is asserted in that case. This proves the theorem with the stated caveats.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

71 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources