Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Heat Equation Maximum Principles Duhamel and Smoothing

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

The page starts from the parabolic cylinder and its parabolic boundary, the class C2,1(Q‾), and the two elementary facts behind every maximum argument: a negative semidefinite Hessian at an interior maximum and the strict-subsolution perturbation u+ε∣x∣2 of the heat operator. From these come the weak parabolic maximum principle, comparison and uniqueness on bounded cylinders, and the whole-space maximum principle under Gaussian growth with its finite strip subdivision. The strong parabolic maximum principle is proved through heat balls: the submean inequality, the heat-ball representation formula, chains of overlapping heat balls along polygonal paths, and the positivity of the lateral measure on the level sets. Consequences recorded here are strict positivity of nonzero nonnegative solutions at later interior times, the comparison of solution values with an interval of boundary values, and the supremum-norm stability estimate for forced problems with its integrated forcing term.

The second half of the page concerns the smoothing and Duhamel aspects. The backward uniqueness lemma for a bounded interval and the backward heat solution map give uniqueness on the smooth interval class and exponential amplification of its sine modes, while the time analyticity of the heat flow is developed from the complex-time kernel on a proper sector: its L1 bounds, L1 differentiability in the parameter, and the bounded holomorphic semigroup law. Instantaneous Lp--Lq smoothing, the Duhamel heat potential, its L1-in-time estimate for Lp forcing, the whole-space Duhamel principle for a bounded spatially Hölder forcing and for Lp-valued continuous forcing, and the inhomogeneous Cauchy formula combine the initial data with the accumulated forcing. The examples page collects the corresponding explicit computations and counterexamples.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Parabolic cylinder and parabolic boundary

Definition

Let n≥1, let Ω⊆Rn be a nonempty bounded open set with closure Ω‾ and boundary ∂Ω in the sense of Interior, closure, boundary, limit point, isolated point and dense subset of a metric space, and let T>0. Write Q:=Ω×(0,T] for the space-time cylinder and Q‾:=Ω‾×[0,T]⊆Rn+1 for its closure in the space-time variable; the final-time face is Ω×{T}, while the parabolic boundary of Q is ∂pQ:=(Ω‾×{0})∪(∂Ω×[0,T]). No point of the final-time face belongs to ∂pQ: the intersections (Ω×{T})∩(Ω‾×{0}) and (Ω×{T})∩(∂Ω×[0,T]) are empty because T>0 and Ω∩∂Ω=∅.

A function u on Q‾ is of class C2,1(Q‾) if it is continuous there, is C2 in x and C1 in t on Q, and the functions ut and Dxαu for ∣α∣≤2 extend continuously to Q‾; the multi-index notation and the classes Ck are those of Ck maps and multi-index derivative notation in Euclidean space, and at t=T the time derivative means the left one-sided limit. The relevant operator is ∂t−Δx, the heat operator of The heat operator, the heat equation, and the Cauchy problem, and the phrase "ut−Δu≤0 in Q" always refers to that cylinder, with the one-sided interpretation of ut on the final-time face.

On this page a classical heat solution means a function with the stated C2,1 regularity satisfying the equation pointwise; no second time derivative is required. Formulas that put time first use the canonical coordinate permutation (x,t)↔(t,x); regularity and derivatives always refer to the named spatial and time variables. The analogous interior class has the same continuous derivatives without an up-to-boundary requirement.

Two elementary topological facts are part of the vocabulary. First, Q‾ is compact: Ω is bounded, so Ω‾ is closed and bounded in Rn, hence compact (Heine-Borel in Rn: with the Euclidean metric a subset of Rn is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded, and the proof by bisection uses no choice principle; the same holds on the real line); then Q‾=Ω‾×[0,T] is closed and bounded in Rn+1, hence compact by the same theorem (Open cover, subcover, compact metric space, and compact subset of a metric space). Second, ∂pQ is closed in Rn+1, being the union of the two closed sets Ω‾×{0} and ∂Ω×[0,T]; in particular it is a closed subset of Q‾ (Interior, closure, boundary, limit point, isolated point and dense subset of a metric space).

Remarks

  • The class C2,1(Q‾) is a convention fixing where the one-sided time derivatives live. The cylinder Q=Ω×(0,T] is open in the spatial directions and half-open in time, and equation statements on Q are read at points with t<T in the usual two-sided sense and at t=T with the left derivative. No global smoothness of ∂Ω is assumed; the maximum principles proved later on this page use only this vocabulary.

  • Top versus parabolic boundary. The decomposition of Q‾ into the parabolic boundary and the cylinder Q is not a topological boundary decomposition: the final-time face is part of the topological boundary of Q but is deliberately excluded from ∂pQ, which is exactly the set on which initial and lateral data are prescribed. A later counterexample on the companion page shows that this asymmetry is forced by the sign of the heat operator and cannot be removed.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

The Hessian is negative semidefinite at an interior local maximum

Statement

Let n≥1, let U⊆Rn be open, let f∈C2(U), and let a∈U be a local maximum of f. Then hTHf(a)h≤0for every h∈Rn; in particular ∇f(a)=0 and Δf(a)=tr⁡Hf(a)≤0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An open U⊆Rn, f∈C2(U), an interior local maximum a∈U, and an arbitrary h∈Rn.

[F1]

At an interior local extremum of a differentiable scalar field the gradient vanishes: ∇f(a)=0 (Fermat's theorem: an interior differentiable local extremum has zero gradient).

[F2]

For a C2 scalar field, f(a+h)=f(a)+∇f(a)⋅h+12⟨Hf(a)h,h⟩+o(∥h∥2) (Second-order Taylor expansion f(a+h)=f(a)+∇f(a)⋅h+12hTHf(a)h+o(∥h∥2)).

[F3]

The Hessian Hf(a) is the matrix of second partial derivatives, and Δf=∑i∂i∂if is the trace of the Hessian (The Hessian matrix and critical points of a scalar field, The Laplacian of a C2 function and of a C2 vector field).

[F4]

Local maximality means f(a)≥f(x) for all x in some Euclidean neighbourhood of a (Local and strict local extrema for scalar fields on Euclidean open sets).

Proof

Given: An open U⊆Rn, f∈C2(U), an interior local maximum a∈U, and h∈Rn.

1.1F1F4given

Since a is an interior point of U at which f has a local maximum, [F1] applies and gives ∇f(a)=0.

2.1step 1.1F2F4given

Suppose hTHf(a)h=:c>0; then h≠0 and [F2] and step 1.1 give f(a+th)=f(a)+t22hTHf(a)h+o(t2)=f(a)+t2(c2+o(1))>f(a) for every sufficiently small t≠0, and a+th lies in the neighbourhood of a on which the local maximum is attained for small t; this contradicts [F4]. Hence hTHf(a)h≤0, and since h was arbitrary the quadratic form of the Hessian is negative semidefinite.

3.1step 2.1F3given∎

Taking h=ei in step 2.1 gives Hii(a)≤0 for every coordinate index i, and by the trace formula [F3] the Laplacian is Δf(a)=∑iHii(a)≤0; together with step 1.1 this is the stated conclusion.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Strict-subsolution perturbation for the heat operator

Statement

Let Q=Ω×(0,T] be a parabolic cylinder (Parabolic cylinder and parabolic boundary) with Ω bounded, and let u∈C2,1(Q‾) satisfy ut−Δu≤0 in Q. Then:

(i) for every ε>0 the function v:=u+ε∣x∣2 is in C2,1(Q‾) and satisfies vt−Δv≤−2nε<0in Q;

(ii) if w∈C2,1(Q‾) satisfies wt−Δw<0 in Q, then max⁡Q‾w=max⁡∂pQw.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A parabolic cylinder Q=Ω×(0,T] with Ω bounded, u∈C2,1(Q‾) with ut−Δu≤0 in Q, and w∈C2,1(Q‾) with wt−Δw<0 in Q.

[F1]

On the open cylinder, C2,1(Q‾) means continuous on Q‾ with C2 spatial and C1 time derivatives on Q extending continuously, and Q‾ is compact while ∂pQ is closed (Parabolic cylinder and parabolic boundary).

[F4]

At an interior local maximum of a C2 function the Hessian is negative semidefinite, so the Laplacian is ≤0 (The Hessian is negative semidefinite at an interior local maximum).

Proof

Given: A bounded parabolic cylinder Q, u∈C2,1(Q‾) with ut−Δu≤0 in Q, and w∈C2,1(Q‾) with wt−Δw<0 in Q.

1.1F2F3given

For ∣x∣2=⟨x,x⟩ the chain rule and product rule give ∂i∣x∣2=2xi and hence ∂i∂i∣x∣2=2 by [F3], so [F2] gives Δ∣x∣2=∑i2=2n; therefore for v=u+ε∣x∣2 one has vt=ut and Δv=Δu+2nε, hence vt−Δv=(ut−Δu)−2nε≤−2nε<0 on Q.

1.2F1F4F6given

By [F6] the function w attains its maximum on Q‾; suppose it is attained at a point P=(x0,t0)∉∂pQ. Then t0≠0 and x0∉∂Ω by the definition of ∂pQ, so x0 is an interior point of Ω and 0<t0≤T; since x0 is an unconstrained local maximum of the spatial function x↦w(x,t0), [F4] gives Δw(P)≤0.

2.1step 1.2F5given

If t0<T, then t0 is an interior point of (0,T) at which the one-variable function t↦w(x0,t) has a local maximum, so [F5] gives wt(P)=0; with step 1.2 this yields (wt−Δw)(P)≥0−0=0, contradicting wt−Δw<0 in Q.

2.2step 1.2F1F5given

If t0=T, then for every 0<h<T the difference quotient (w(x0,T)−w(x0,T−h))/h is ≥0 because T maximises t↦w(x0,t); [F5] gives an interior point ch∈(T−h,T) with wt(x0,ch) equal to that quotient, and continuity of wt up to the top face (the class of [F1]) gives wt(x0,T)=lim⁡h↓0wt(x0,ch)≥0; with Δw(x0,T)≤0 from step 1.2 this again contradicts wt−Δw<0.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1step 2.2given∎

Steps 1.1, 2.1 and 2.2 show (i) and that the maximum of any strict subsolution w is attained on ∂pQ, which is (ii).

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Weak parabolic maximum principle

Statement

Let Q=Ω×(0,T] be a parabolic cylinder (Parabolic cylinder and parabolic boundary) with Ω bounded, and let u∈C2,1(Q‾) satisfy ut−Δu≤0 in Q. Then max⁡Q‾u=max⁡∂pQu.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A parabolic cylinder Q=Ω×(0,T] with Ω bounded and u∈C2,1(Q‾) with ut−Δu≤0 in Q.

[F1]

Q‾ is compact, ∂pQ is a closed subset of it, and the class C2,1(Q‾) is the cylinder convention of Parabolic cylinder and parabolic boundary.

[F2]

For every ε>0 the function v=u+ε∣x∣2 is a strict subsolution, and the maximum of any strict subsolution is attained on ∂pQ (Strict-subsolution perturbation for the heat operator); the Euclidean squares ∣x∣2 are those of The Euclidean inner product ⟨x,y⟩=∑k<nxkyk on Rn.

Proof

Given: A bounded parabolic cylinder Q and u∈C2,1(Q‾) with ut−Δu≤0 in Q.

1.1F1F3given

By [F1] and [F3] the maxima max⁡Q‾u and max⁡∂pQu exist, and R2:=sup⁡x∈Ω‾∣x∣2 is finite because Ω is bounded; also u≤max⁡Q‾u and, for every x∈Ω‾, ∣x∣2≤R2.

2.1step 1.1F2F3given

For every ε>0 put v:=u+ε∣x∣2; by [F2] v is a strict subsolution, so max⁡Q‾v=max⁡∂pQv, and max⁡Q‾u≤max⁡Q‾v=max⁡∂pQv≤max⁡∂pQu+εR2 by step 1.1; letting ε↓0 and using the Archimedean property [F3] gives max⁡Q‾u≤max⁡∂pQu.

3.1step 2.1given∎

Since ∂pQ⊆Q‾, the reverse inequality max⁡∂pQu≤max⁡Q‾u is immediate, so the two maxima coincide and the weak maximum principle holds.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Heat balls and their time slices

Definition

Assume Countable Choice. Let n≥1, and let Γ be the heat kernel of The heat kernel on Rn and its causal extension, with ∣x−y∣2=⟨x−y,x−y⟩ the Euclidean square of The Euclidean inner product ⟨x,y⟩=∑k<nxkyk on Rn. For a space-time point P=(x,t)∈Rn×R and r>0 the heat ball is Er(t,x)=Er(P):={(y,s)∈Rn+1:s<t, Γ(x−y,t−s)≥r−n}∪{(x,t)}. Write τ:=t−s for the time depth below the top point. Record the following facts.

(i) Er(t,x) is compact, and (x,t) is its unique point of maximal time;

(ii) for 0<τ<r2/(4π) the time slice is the closed ball {y:(y,t−τ)∈Er(t,x)}=B‾(x,ρn(τ)),ρn(τ):=2nτlog⁡r24πτ, the slice at τ=r2/(4π) is the single point {x}, and the slice is empty for τ>r2/(4π); the function ρn is continuous on (0,r2/4π) and ρn(τ)→0 as τ↓0;

(iii) sup⁡0<τ<r2/4πρn(τ)=r22nπe, attained at τ=r2/(4πe), so Er(t,x)⊆B‾(x,r22n/πe)×[t−r2/4π,t];

(iv) the boundary is ∂Er(t,x)={(y,s):s<t, Γ(x−y,t−s)=r−n}∪{(x,t)}, and on the level set Γ=r−n the gradient of Γ is nowhere zero, so that level set is a C∞ hypersurface.

Remarks

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Heat-ball representation formula

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Let u be of class C2,1 on a neighbourhood of the closed heat ball E:=Er(t,x) of Heat balls and their time slices, and put f:=ut−Δu. Then, with ρn the slice radius, u(x,t)=∬E(Γ(x−y,t−s)−r−n)f(y,s) dy ds+12rn∫t−r2/4πtρn(t−s)t−s∫∣y−x∣=ρn(t−s)u(y,s) dS(y) ds, all integrals absolutely convergent. For n=1, the inner sphere integral is the sum over its two points; endpoint slices are irrelevant to the time integral.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, a C2,1 function u on a neighbourhood of the closed heat ball E=Er(t,x), and f=ut−Δu.

[A1]

Countable Choice is the ambient hypothesis; the divergence theorem and the surface integral are stated under ACω (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

The heat ball Er(t,x) is compact, its slice at depth τ=t−s is B‾(x,ρn(τ))={∣y−x∣≤ρn(τ)} for 0<τ<r2/(4π), the level set on which Γ(x−y,t−s)=r−n is a C∞ hypersurface on which ∇Γ≠0, and ∂Er(t,x) is that level set together with the single top point (x,t) (Heat balls and their time slices).

[F2]

The heat kernel Γ is C∞ on Rn×(0,∞), solves ∂τΓ=ΔxΓ there, and has unit mass ∫RnΓ(x,τ) dx=1 for every τ>0 (Normalisation, parabolic scaling, heat equation and derivative bounds for the heat kernel); the Laplacian is that of The Laplacian of a C2 function and of a C2 vector field and the class C2,1 is the cylinder convention of Parabolic cylinder and parabolic boundary.

[F3]

Divergence theorem: for a bounded domain with a finite piecewise C1 presentation and a C1 field F on its closure, ∫Ωdiv⁡F=∑j∫SjF⋅νj dS (Divergence for finite piecewise C1 presentations), the surface integral and the outward normal being those of Surface integration on compact C1 hypersurfaces and Classical normal derivative.

[F4]

Dominated convergence (Dominated convergence).

[F7]

Polar measure is finite and gives polar integration (Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma, The polar surface set function on the unit sphere); on spheres in dimensions n≥2 it agrees with chart surface measure and scales by Rn−1 (Agreement with the existing polar sphere measure). Fubini applies to absolutely integrable functions (Tonelli and Fubini for the completed product, with only almost-everywhere section measurability). Exponential decay dominates polynomial growth (The exponential dominates every fixed nonnegative integer power at +∞).

Proof

Given: Countable Choice, u∈C2,1 near E=Er(t,x), and f=ut−Δu. Put a=r2/(4π) and R(τ)=ρn(τ).

1.1A1F6given

Choose a bounded neighbourhood O of E whose closure lies in the given neighbourhood of u. By [F6], normalize a nonnegative smooth bump supported in the unit ball of Rn+1 to have mass one, and let uj be its shrinking convolutions with u1O. For large j these are smooth near E. In the translated integration formula, differentiation with respect to time once or space at most twice differentiates u under a fixed compactly supported integral by [F6]; hence these derivatives of uj are the corresponding convolutions of the continuous derivatives of u. Their uniform convergence on E follows from uniform continuity and the estimate ∣g∗ηj(P)−g(P)∣≤sup⁡∣h∣≤1/j∣g(P−h)−g(P)∣. Thus uj→u and fj:=(uj)t−Δuj→f uniformly on E. It suffices to prove the formula for smooth u, then pass to the limit using the integrable bounds below.

2.1step 1.1F1F2F3given

For smooth u, put v(y,s)=Γ(x−y,t−s)−r−n on s<t; it is smooth there and satisfies vs+Δyv=0 by [F2]. For 0<ε<a, the interior of Eε=E∩{s≤t−ε} is a bounded piecewise smooth domain. The lower tip is regular by [F1], and the cap intersects the lateral surface transversely because its spatial gradient is nonzero there. In spatial-first coordinates the smooth field F=(u∇yv−v∇yu,uv) has div⁡F=v(us−Δyu)=vf. Applying [F3] to Eε gives the volume integral as the sum of the lateral flux and the top-cap flux. No smoothness of v at (x,t) is used.

3.1step 2.1F1F2F3F7given

On the lateral level v=0 the outward normal is −∇v/∣∇v∣, so F⋅ν=−u∣∇yv∣2/∣∇v∣. Away from the lower tip use the parametrization (τ,θ)↦(x+R(τ)θ,t−τ). Since RR′=n(log⁡(a/τ)−1), its chart surface element is 1+R′2Rn−1dτ dσ(θ), by the Gram determinant formula in [F3] and the sphere identification [F7]. Also ∣∇yv∣=Rr−n/(2τ) and ∣∇v∣=r−nR2+(RR′)2/(2τ). Cancelling these factors gives the lateral flux −12rn∫εaR(τ)τ∫∣y−x∣=R(τ)u(y,t−τ) dS(y) dτ. When n=1 the parametrization has two curves and dσ is counting measure on {−1,1} (each defining polar cone has length one), giving the same formula. The single lower tip has zero chart surface measure and does not affect the flux.

3.2step 2.1F1F2F4F6given

The cap has outward normal (0,…,0,1), so its flux is ∫∣y−x∣≤R(ε)u(y,t−ε)v(y,t−ε) dy. Scaling y−x=εz and R(ε)/ε=2nlog⁡(a/ε)→∞ shows that the Gaussian mass of the cap tends to one, by [F2] and [F4]. The subtracted mass r−n∣B1∣R(ε)n tends to zero. Since v≥0, its cap mass is at most one, and uniform continuity of u on the shrinking cap therefore makes the flux tend to u(x,t).

4.1step 2.1step 3.1step 3.2F2F4F7given

The volume integrand has an integrable majorant despite the top singularity: 0≤v≤Γ on E below its top, and ∬EΓ dy ds≤∫0a1 dτ=a by [F2] and [F7]. Hence ∣vf∣≤∥f∥∞Γ is integrable. The absolute lateral integral is at most σ(Sn−1)2rn∥u∥∞∫0aR(τ)n/τ dτ. Substituting τ=ae−q makes this last integral a constant times ∫0∞e−nq/2qn/2 dq<∞; exponential domination [F7] gives integrability at infinity and the integrand is bounded near zero. Thus dominated convergence in the truncated identity from step 2.1, with steps 3.1 and 3.2, yields the stated representation and absolute convergence.

5.1step 1.1step 4.1given∎

Apply the smooth formula of step 4.1 to uj from step 1.1. Uniform convergence of uj and fj on E, multiplied by the finite volume and lateral weights just proved, passes both right-hand integrals to those for u and the left side to u(x,t). This establishes the formula under precisely the stated C2,1 hypothesis.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Submean inequality for heat subsolutions on heat balls

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Let u be of class C2,1 on a neighbourhood of the closed heat ball Er(t,x) of Heat balls and their time slices and suppose ut−Δu≤0 there. Then u(x,t)≤12rn∫t−r2/4πtρn(t−s)t−s∫∣y−x∣=ρn(t−s)u(y,s) dS(y) ds. In particular, if u≤M on Er(t,x) then u(x,t)≤M.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, a C2,1 function u on a neighbourhood of the closed heat ball Er(t,x) with ut−Δu≤0 there.

[A1]

Countable Choice is the ambient hypothesis (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

On the heat ball below its top point, the defining inequality gives Γ(x−y,t−s)−r−n≥0; the single top point is irrelevant to the volume integral. The slice radius is ρn(τ)=2nτlog⁡r24πτ>0 for 0<τ<r2/(4π) (Heat balls and their time slices).

[F2]

Representation formula: for u of class C2,1 near Er(t,x) and f=ut−Δu, u(x,t)=∬E(Γ(x−y,t−s)−r−n)f(y,s) dy ds+12rn∫t−r2/4πtρn(t−s)t−s∫∣y−x∣=ρn(t−s)u(y,s) dS(y) ds, all integrals absolutely convergent (Heat-ball representation formula).

Proof

Given: Countable Choice, u of class C2,1 near the closed heat ball Er(t,x) with ut−Δu≤0 there, and a constant M with u≤M on Er(t,x).

1.1A1F1F2given

Put f:=ut−Δu; by hypothesis f≤0 on Er(t,x), while [F1] gives Γ(x−y,t−s)−r−n≥0 there, so its integrand is nonpositive almost everywhere and the double integral in the representation formula of [F2] is ≤0.

2.1step 1.1F2given

Applying [F2] and discarding the nonpositive double integral by step 1.1 gives u(x,t)≤12rn∫t−r2/4πtρn(t−s)t−s∫∣y−x∣=ρn(t−s)u(y,s) dS(y) ds, which is the submean inequality.

3.1step 2.1F1F2given∎

If in addition u≤M on Er(t,x), then the averaging kernel ρn(t−s)2rn(t−s) is nonnegative by [F1] and the sphere integrals of the constant M satisfy 12rn∫t−r2/4πtρn(t−s)t−s∫∣y−x∣=ρn(t−s)M dS(y) ds=M, because the representation formula [F2] applied to the constant function u≡M (whose forcing vanishes) reduces to that identity; hence step 2.1 gives u(x,t)≤M.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Heat-ball chains reach earlier points

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Let Ω⊆Rn be open, let 0<t1<t0≤T<∞, and let γ:[0,1]→Ω be a Lipschitz path with compact image K. Then there is ρ>0 such that Eρ(P)⊆Ω×(0,T] for every P∈K×[t1,t0], and for every s∈[t1,t0) there are N≥1 and points P0=(γ(0),t0),P1,…,PN=(γ(1),s), all lying in K×[t1,t0], with Pj+1∈Eρ(Pj) for all 0≤j<N.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, an open set Ω⊆Rn, times 0<t1<t0≤T<∞, a Lipschitz path γ:[0,1]→Ω with compact image K, and s∈[t1,t0).

[A1]

Countable Choice is the ambient hypothesis (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

Heat balls are enclosed in a spatial ball and a time interval: Er(t,x)⊆B‾(x,r22n/πe)×[t−r2/4π,t] for all (t,x) and r>0 (Heat balls and their time slices).

[F6]

For 0<τ<r2/(4π) the time slice of Er(t,x) at depth τ is the closed ball of radius ρn(τ)=2nτlog⁡r24πτ (Heat balls and their time slices).

[F2]

For nonempty A, put dA(x)=inf⁡z∈A∣x−z∣. The triangle inequality gives dA(x)≤∣x−y∣+dA(y) and its reverse, hence ∣dA(x)−dA(y)∣≤∣x−y∣. Thus this distance is 1-Lipschitz and continuous. A continuous real function on a nonempty compact set attains its minimum (Lipschitz map, α-Hölder map for rational 0<α≤1, and contraction, A continuous real-valued function on a nonempty compact metric space is bounded and attains a greatest and a least value, Open cover, subcover, compact metric space, and compact subset of a metric space).

[F3]

log⁡:(0,∞)→R is strictly increasing and onto R (Order, continuity, range, and the product, quotient, and reciprocal laws for the natural logarithm).

[F4]

Archimedean property: for every real x there is a natural number n≥1 with x<n; and for every ε>0 there is n≥1 with 1/n<ε (Every complete ordered field is Archimedean, For every ε>0 in a complete ordered field there is a natural n≥1 with 1/n<ε).

[F5]

Balls in a metric space are the sets B(x,r)={y:d(x,y)<r} (Open ball, closed ball and sphere in a metric space), and a Lipschitz path satisfies ∣γ(u)−γ(v)∣≤L∣u−v∣ for its Lipschitz constant L (Lipschitz map, α-Hölder map for rational 0<α≤1, and contraction).

Proof

Given: Countable Choice, an open Ω⊆Rn, times 0<t1<t0≤T<∞, a Lipschitz path γ with compact image K, and s∈[t1,t0).

1.1A1F2F5given

The image K is nonempty. If A:=Rn∖Ω is nonempty, [F2] makes dA continuous and gives an attained minimum d=min⁡KdA>0: each x∈K⊆Ω has a ball B(x,rx)⊆Ω, so dA(x)≥rx>0, including at a minimum point. If A is empty, set d=1.

2.1step 1.1F1F4given

Choose ρ>0 with ρ22n/πe<d and ρ2/(4π)<t1 (possible by [F4]); then for every P=(x,t)∈K×[t1,t0], [F1] gives Eρ(P)⊆B‾(x,ρ22n/πe)×[t−ρ2/4π,t], and the spatial ball lies in Ω because its radius is less than d≤dA(x) when A is nonempty, and the inclusion is automatic otherwise, while t−ρ2/4π≥t1−ρ2/4π>0 and t≤t0≤T; hence Eρ(P)⊆Ω×(0,T].

3.1step 2.1F3F4F5F6given

Let L be a Lipschitz constant of γ and put δ:=(t0−s)/N>0 and Pj:=(γ(j/N),t0−jδ) for 0≤j≤N, so P0=(γ(0),t0) and PN=(γ(1),s). By [F5], ∣γ((j+1)/N)−γ(j/N)∣≤L/N, so Pj+1∈Eρ(Pj) holds by [F6] as soon as L2/N2≤2nδlog⁡ρ24πδ, which is implied by L2≤2n(t0−s)log⁡ρ2N4π(t0−s)=:R(N) together with δ<ρ2/(4π); by [F3] the map N↦R(N) is unbounded above and N>(4π(t0−s))/ρ2 for all large N, so [F4] supplies such an N.

4.1step 2.1step 3.1given∎

The ρ of step 2.1 and the chain of step 3.1, together with the fact that s∈[t1,t0) was arbitrary, are exactly the assertions of the lemma; the chain points Pj=(γ(j/N),t0−jδ) lie on the graph of the path, hence in K×[s,t0]⊆K×[t1,t0], and since Ω is open and every two points of a connected component of Ω are joined by a polygonal, hence Lipschitz, path (Every connected component of an open subset of Rn is open and polygonally connected), the chain hypothesis is never vacuous for such points.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Strong parabolic maximum principle

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Let Q=Ω×(0,T] be a parabolic cylinder with Ω bounded, let u∈C2,1(Q‾) satisfy ut−Δu≤0 in Q, and suppose the maximum M:=max⁡Q‾u is attained at a point (x0,t0) with x0∈Ω and 0<t0≤T. Let Ω0 be the connected component of Ω containing x0. Then u=Mon Ω0×(0,t0].

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, a parabolic cylinder Q=Ω×(0,T] with Ω bounded, u∈C2,1(Q‾) with ut−Δu≤0 in Q, and a point (x0,t0) with x0∈Ω, 0<t0≤T and u(x0,t0)=M:=max⁡Q‾u.

[A1]

Countable Choice is the ambient hypothesis (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

Submean inequality: if u is C2,1 on a neighbourhood of a closed heat ball Eη(P) and ut−Δu≤0 there, then u(P)≤12ηn∫tP−η2/4πtPρn(tP−s)tP−s∫∣y−xP∣=ρn(tP−s)u(y,s) dS(y) ds, and u(P)≤M whenever u≤M on Eη(P) (Submean inequality for heat subsolutions on heat balls).

[F2]

Time slices of heat balls: for 0<τ<r2/(4π) the time slice of Er(t,x) is the closed ball of radius ρn(τ)=2nτlog⁡r24πτ; the slice at τ=r2/(4π) is the single point {x} and the slice is empty for τ>r2/(4π), so Er(t,x)⊆Q forces t−r2/(4π)>0; the spatial projection of Er(t,x) then lies compactly inside the open set Ω (Heat balls and their time slices).

[F3]

The level set Lr(P):={(y,s):s<tP, Γ(xP−y,tP−s)=r−n} is the lateral part of ∂Er(P), it is a C∞ hypersurface on which ∇Γ≠0, and the top point P is the only point of ∂Er(P) outside it (Heat balls and their time slices).

[F4]

Representation formula: for u of class C2,1 near the closed heat ball Er(P), u(P)=∬E(Γ(xP−y,tP−s)−r−n)(ut−Δu)+Λr(P)[u], where Λr(P)[g]:=12rn∫0r2/4πρn(τ)τ∫∣y−xP∣=ρn(τ)g(y,tP−τ) dS(y) dτ for continuous g; applied to the constant function 1, whose forcing vanishes, it gives Λr(P)[1]=1 (Heat-ball representation formula).

[F5]

The lateral functional is a positive measure with density R(τ)n/(2rnτ) in the sphere-time parametrization for 0<τ<r2/(4π), as computed in Heat-ball representation formula. Its total mass is one by [F4]. Every nonempty open piece of this parameter domain has positive measure: for n≥2, a regular sphere chart has strictly positive Gram density, and a small coordinate box has positive Lebesgue measure; for n=1 each of the two sphere points has counting mass one. Thus a continuous nonnegative function with zero lateral integral vanishes on the parametrized part of Lr(P). It also vanishes at the lower tip by continuity, since that tip is a limit of lateral points. The lateral level itself is not compact (it omits the top); no compactness assertion or mass at a tip is needed (Surface integration on compact C1 hypersurfaces, A box in Rn with parameters ai≤bi is Lebesgue measurable of measure ∏i<n(bi−ai), whichever of its faces are included, Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral, The nonnegative integral agrees with the simple integral on simple functions).

[F6]

Chaining: for open Ω, times 0<t1<t0≤T<∞ and a Lipschitz path γ:[0,1]→Ω with compact image K, there is ρ>0 with Eρ(P)⊆Ω×(0,T] for every P∈K×[t1,t0], and for every s∈[t1,t0) there is a chain P0=(γ(0),t0),…,PN=(γ(1),s), all lying in K×[t1,t0], with Pj+1∈Eρ(Pj) (Heat-ball chains reach earlier points).

[F7]

Ω0 is open and connected, hence polygonally connected: any two of its points are joined by a polygonal, hence Lipschitz, path with compact image (Every connected component of an open subset of Rn is open and polygonally connected, Separation of a topological space, connected and disconnected spaces, clopen sets, and connected subsets).

Proof

Given: Countable Choice, a bounded parabolic cylinder Q, a subsolution u∈C2,1(Q‾) with maximum M=u(x0,t0) at x0∈Ω, 0<t0≤T.

1.1A1F1F2F3F4F5F8given

Fix P∈Q with u(P)=M and η>0 with Eη(P)⊆Q. Then u=M on the lateral boundary Lη(P). If tP<T, the spatial projection of Eη(P) is compactly contained in Ω and its times lie in [tP−η2/4π,tP] with both endpoints strictly inside (0,T), so u is C2,1 on a neighbourhood of the closed heat ball and [F1] and [F4] apply: M=u(P)≤Λη(P)[u]≤M Λη(P)[1]=M, since u≤M on Q; hence Λη(P)[M−u]=0 and [F5] gives M−u≡0 on Lη(P). If tP=T, put Pδ:=(xP,T−δ) for 0<δ<12(T−η2/4π), so that Eη(Pδ)⊆Ω×(0,T) and u is C2,1 on a neighbourhood of it; substituting s′=s−δ in the slice formula of [F1] turns Λη(Pδ)[u] into Λη(P)[u(⋅,⋅−δ)], so u(Pδ)≤Λη(P)[u(⋅,⋅−δ)]≤M by [F1] and [F4]; as δ↓0 one has u(Pδ)→u(P)=M, while sup⁡Lη(P)∣u(y,s−δ)−u(y,s)∣→0 by [F8] because all the points (y,s−δ) and (y,s) lie in the compact Q‾; therefore M≤Λη(P)[u]≤M and again Λη(P)[M−u]=0, so [F5] gives M−u≡0 on Lη(P).

2.1step 1.1F2F3given

If P∈Q has u(P)=M and Eη(P)⊆Q, then Eη(P)⊆S:={R∈Q:u(R)=M}: the top point P lies in S, and for Q∗∈Eη(P) with Q∗≠P put η∗:=Γ(xP−y∗,tP−s∗)−1/n, which is well defined and positive because s∗<tP; then η∗≤η, so Eη∗(P)⊆Eη(P)⊆Q and Q∗∈Lη∗(P), and step 1.1 applied with radius η∗ gives u(Q∗)=M.

3.1step 2.1F6F7given

Fix y∈Ω0 and s∈(0,t0). By [F7] choose a polygonal, hence Lipschitz, path γ:[0,1]→Ω0 from x0 to y, with compact image K, and put t1:=s/2, so that 0<t1<t0≤T and s∈[t1,t0). By [F6] there are ρ>0 with Eρ(R)⊆Q for every R∈K×[t1,t0], and a chain P0=(x0,t0),P1,…,PN=(y,s) inside K×[t1,t0] with Pj+1∈Eρ(Pj) for all j<N. Since u(x0,t0)=M, induction on j using step 2.1 gives Pj∈S for every j, and in particular u(y,s)=M.

4.1step 3.1given∎

Since y∈Ω0 and s∈(0,t0) were arbitrary, step 3.1 gives u=M on Ω0×(0,t0), and continuity of u on Q‾ extends this to the closed time level Ω0×(0,t0], which is the claim. The only selections made are finitely many real parameters and one integer N; Countable Choice is used only through the measure, integration and compactness suppliers named in [F1]–[F8].

CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Strict positivity propagates to later interior times

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Let Ω be bounded and connected and u∈C2,1(Ω‾×[0,T]) be a nonnegative homogeneous heat solution. If u(x∗,s∗)>0 at an interior point with 0<s∗<T, then u(x,t)>0 for every x∈Ω and s∗<t≤T. The same conclusion for every 0<t≤T holds if the continuous initial trace is positive at some interior point. Nontriviality only at a later time does not assert positivity before that time.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, a bounded connected open Ω⊆Rn, T>0, and a nonnegative u∈C2,1(Q‾) on Q=Ω×(0,T] with ut−Δu=0 in Q.

[A1]

Countable Choice is the ambient hypothesis (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

Strong parabolic maximum principle: on a bounded parabolic cylinder, a subsolution attaining its maximum M at an interior point (x0,t0) with x0∈Ω and 0<t0≤T is equal to M on Ω0×(0,t0], where Ω0 is the connected component of Ω containing x0 (Strong parabolic maximum principle).

[F2]

The cylinder Q=Ω×(0,T] and the class C2,1(Q‾) are those of Parabolic cylinder and parabolic boundary; in particular u is continuous on Q‾ and ut−Δu=0 on the open cylinder.

[F3]

Connectedness and components: C(x) is the largest connected subset of X containing x (Connected components, quasicomponents, and totally disconnected spaces), so a connected space X has C(x)=X for every x∈X since X itself is then a connected subset containing x (Separation of a topological space, connected and disconnected spaces, clopen sets, and connected subsets); in particular the component Ω0 of [F1] equals Ω for every x0∈Ω.

[F4]

Continuity at a point: for real ε>0 there is δ>0 with ∣u(x,s)−u(x0,0)∣<ε whenever (x,s)∈Q‾ is within δ of (x0,0) (Continuity of a map between metric spaces, at a point and globally, in the ε-δ form).

Proof

Given: Countable Choice, a bounded connected Ω, and a nonnegative solution u∈C2,1(Q‾) with ut−Δu=0 in Q.

1.1A1F1F2F3given

Let t1∈(s∗,T] and x1∈Ω with u(x1,t1)=0. On the truncated cylinder Q1:=Ω×(0,t1] put v:=−u; then v∈C2,1(Q1‾), vt−Δv=0 in Q1, and v≤0 on Q1‾ because u≥0, so the maximum M=0 of v over Q1‾ is attained at (x1,t1) with x1∈Ω and 0<t1≤t1; since Ω is connected, [F3] makes the relevant component all of Ω, and [F1] gives v=0 on Ω×(0,t1], that is u=0 there. But s∗<t1 and x∗∈Ω, so u(x∗,s∗)=0, contradicting the hypothesis u(x∗,s∗)>0. Hence u(x,t)>0 for every x∈Ω and s∗<t≤T.

2.1step 1.1F2F4given

Suppose now that the continuous initial trace satisfies u(x0,0)>0 at some interior point x0∈Ω, and let t∈(0,T] be given. Choose s∗∈(0,min⁡(t,T)); by [F4] applied with ε=u(x0,0)/2>0 there is δ>0 with u(x,s)>u(x0,0)/2>0 for every (x,s)∈Q‾ with ∣(x,s)−(x0,0)∣<δ, and the point (x0,s∗) qualifies for s∗ small enough, so it is admissible in step 1.1; since s∗<t, step 1.1 gives u(x,t)>0 for every x∈Ω. As t∈(0,T] was arbitrary, a positive interior point of the initial trace forces strict positivity at all later interior space-time points.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1given∎

Steps 1.1 and 2.1 establish both positivity clauses of the statement, together with the recorded caveat: positivity of u at one interior time s∗ propagates only to later times t>s∗, and no claim is made about times before s∗; no global lower bound, boundary positivity or uniqueness statement is asserted. The argument uses no choice beyond the Countable Choice declared in [A1].

CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Comparison and uniqueness for the bounded-cylinder heat problem

Statement

Let Q=Ω×(0,T] be a parabolic cylinder (Parabolic cylinder and parabolic boundary) with Ω bounded.

(i) If u,v∈C2,1(Q‾) satisfy ut−Δu≤vt−Δv in Q and u≤v on ∂pQ, then u≤v on Q‾.

(ii) If f∈C(Q) and g∈C(∂pQ) are real-valued, then there is at most one u∈C2,1(Q‾) with ut−Δu=f in Q and u=g on ∂pQ.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A bounded parabolic cylinder Q=Ω×(0,T], functions u,v∈C2,1(Q‾), and (for part (ii)) data f∈C(Q) and g∈C(∂pQ).

[F1]

The cylinder vocabulary and the class C2,1(Q‾) are those of Parabolic cylinder and parabolic boundary.

[F2]

Weak maximum principle: if w∈C2,1(Q‾) satisfies wt−Δw≤0 in Q, then max⁡Q‾w=max⁡∂pQw (Weak parabolic maximum principle).

Proof

Given: A bounded parabolic cylinder Q, u,v∈C2,1(Q‾), and data f,g for part (ii).

1.1F1F2F3given

For part (i) put w:=u−v; by [F3] w∈C2,1(Q‾) and wt−Δw=(ut−Δu)−(vt−Δv)≤0 in Q, while w=u−v≤0 on ∂pQ; [F2] therefore gives max⁡Q‾w=max⁡∂pQw≤0, that is, u≤v on Q‾.

2.1step 1.1F2F3given

For part (ii) let u1,u2∈C2,1(Q‾) both satisfy ut−Δu=f in Q and u=g on ∂pQ, and put w:=u1−u2; by [F3] w∈C2,1(Q‾) with wt−Δw=0 in Q and w=0 on ∂pQ. Applying part (i), proved in step 1.1, to the pair (w,0) gives w≤0 on Q‾, and applying it to the pair (0,w) gives w≥0; hence w≡0 and u1=u2, so there is at most one such solution.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1given∎

Steps 1.1 and 2.1 prove the comparison statement (i) and the uniqueness statement (ii) for the bounded-cylinder Dirichlet problem; no sign of the operator beyond the subsolution direction enters, and no additional hypotheses on ∂Ω are used.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Supremum norm stability for forced heat problems

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Let Ω⊆Rn be nonempty, bounded and open, T>0, and let real u,v∈C2,1(Ω‾×[0,T]) solve ut−Δu=f, vt−Δv=g with f,g∈C(Ω‾×[0,T]). Put a=∥u(⋅,0)−v(⋅,0)∥∞, bt=sup⁡∂Ω×[0,t]∣u−v∣, and m(s)=max⁡Ω‾∣f(⋅,s)−g(⋅,s)∣. Then for 0<t≤T, sup⁡Ω‾×[0,t]∣u−v∣≤max⁡(a,bt)+∫0tm(s)ds, and hence also the bound with a+bt in place of the maximum.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, a bounded open Ω⊆Rn, T>0, real u,v∈C2,1(Q‾) on Q=Ω×(0,T] with ut−Δu=f and vt−Δv=g in Q for continuous f,g, and 0<t≤T.

[A1]

Countable Choice is the ambient hypothesis (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

Cylinder convention and parabolic boundary: the class C2,1(Q‾), the closed cylinder Ω‾×[0,T] and ∂p(Ω×(0,t])=(Ω‾×{0})∪(∂Ω×[0,t]) are those of Parabolic cylinder and parabolic boundary.

[F2]

Comparison: if U,V∈C2,1(Q‾) with Q=Ω×(0,t], Ut−ΔU≤Vt−ΔV in Q and U≤V on ∂pQ, then U≤V on Q‾ (Comparison and uniqueness for the bounded-cylinder heat problem).

[F4]

Fundamental theorem of calculus, first part: if φ is continuous on [0,t], then s↦∫0sφ is differentiable with derivative φ (The first fundamental theorem: if f is integrable on [a,b] and continuous at c, then F′(c)=f(c); in particular a continuous f has F as a primitive), continuity on a compact interval supplying the integrability used to form the integral (A continuous function on [a,b] is Riemann integrable, by Heine-Cantor and Riemann's criterion).

[F5]

The Laplacian is Δw=∑i∂i∂iw (The Laplacian of a C2 function and of a C2 vector field), the partial derivatives being those of Directional derivatives and partial derivatives of a map U⊆Rm→Rn; a function of the time variable alone has all its x-partial derivatives 0, and ±m is an admissible forcing for the comparison principle.

Proof

Given: Countable Choice, bounded Ω, T>0, solutions u,v∈C2,1(Q‾) of ut−Δu=f, vt−Δv=g, continuous f,g, and 0<t≤T.

1.1A1F1F3given

Put w:=u−v and Qt:=Ω×(0,t]. Then w∈C2,1(Qt‾) with wt−Δw=f−g in Qt, and on the parabolic boundary of Qt one has ∣w∣≤a on Ω‾×{0} and ∣w∣≤bt on ∂Ω×[0,t] by the definitions of a and bt; moreover the function s↦m(s)=max⁡Ω‾∣f(⋅,s)−g(⋅,s)∣ is well defined on [0,t] and continuous there: it is a maximum of a continuous function on the compact Ω‾ for each s by [F3], and given ε>0, uniform continuity of f and g on the compact Q‾ [F3] gives δ>0 such that ∣f(x,s)−f(x,s0)∣<ε/2 and ∣g(x,s)−g(x,s0)∣<ε/2 for all x∈Ω‾ whenever ∣s−s0∣<δ, whence ∣m(s)−m(s0)∣≤ε.

2.1step 1.1F4F5given

Let M:=max⁡(a,bt)≥0 and for s∈[0,t] put W+(s):=M+∫0sm(σ) dσ and W−(s):=−M−∫0sm(σ) dσ, viewed as functions of (s,x). By [F4] and the continuity of m from step 1.1, both are of class C2,1(Qt‾) with (W±)t−ΔW±=±m: the time derivative is ±m(s) by [F4] and every x-partial derivative vanishes because W± depends on s alone, so ΔW±=0 by [F5]. On the parabolic boundary of Qt one has W−≤−M≤w≤M≤W+, since ∣w∣≤M there by step 1.1.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1F2given

Comparison applied twice. For the pair (U,V)=(w,W+): wt−Δw−(W+,t−ΔW+)=(f−g)−m≤0 in Qt and w≤W+ on ∂pQt by step 2.1, so [F2] gives w≤W+ on Qt‾. For the pair (U,V)=(W−,w): W−,t−ΔW−−(wt−Δw)=−m−(f−g)≤0 in Qt and W−≤w on ∂pQt by step 2.1, so [F2] gives W−≤w on Qt‾. Therefore ∣w(s,x)∣≤M+∫0sm(σ) dσ for every (s,x)∈[0,t]×Ω‾.

4.1step 3.1given∎

Since s↦∫0sm is nondecreasing on [0,t] (the integrand is nonnegative), step 3.1 gives ∣u−v∣≤M+∫0tm on Ω‾×[0,t], hence sup⁡Ω‾×[0,t]∣u−v∣≤max⁡(a,bt)+∫0tm(s) ds. Finally max⁡(a,bt)≤a+bt, so the same estimate holds with a+bt in place of the maximum.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Energy uniqueness for the homogeneous heat equation

Statement

Assume ACω. Let n≥2, let Ω⊆Rn be a bounded C1 domain (or belong to the specified finite piecewise C1 class) of Bounded C1 domains and their outward normals, let T>0, and let u∈C2,1(Q‾) solve ut−Δu=0 in Q=Ω×(0,T] with u=0 on ∂Ω×[0,T] and u(⋅,0)=0 on Ω. Then u≡0 on Q‾; equivalently, the Dirichlet problem for the homogeneous heat equation is unique in this class by the energy method. No backward-in-time or terminal-data uniqueness is claimed here (the time-reversed function solves the backward heat equation, for which the energy is nondecreasing rather than nonincreasing).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: ACω, n≥2, a bounded C1 domain Ω in the Green-identity class, T>0, and u∈C2,1(Q‾) with ut−Δu=0 in Q, u=0 on ∂Ω×[0,T] and u(⋅,0)=0 on Ω.

[A1]

Countable Choice is the ambient hypothesis, carried by the Green identity supplier (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

Differentiation under the integral sign with an integrable majorant (Differentiation under the integral sign).

[F2]

Green's first identity: for real u∈C2(Ω‾) and v∈C1(Ω‾), ∫Ω(vΔu+Du⋅Dv) dx=∫∂Ωv∂νu dS (First Green identity).

[F4]

Δu=∑i∂i∂iu in the notation of The Laplacian of a C2 function and of a C2 vector field, and the domain class and boundary conventions are those of Bounded C1 domains and their outward normals.

[F6]

Dominated convergence (Dominated convergence).

[F7]

Every bounded open set has finite measure because it lies in a bounded box (A box in Rn with parameters ai≤bi is Lebesgue measurable of measure ∏i<n(bi−ai), whichever of its faces are included). A nonnegative continuous function g with zero integral on an open set vanishes everywhere: if g(x0)>0, a small nondegenerate box B inside that set has g≥g(x0)/2 on B, so ∫g≥(g(x0)/2)λn(B)>0, a contradiction by the same box-volume formula.

Proof

Given: ACω, a bounded C1 domain Ω⊂Rn with n≥2, T>0, and u∈C2,1(Q‾) with ut−Δu=0 in Q, u=0 on ∂Ω×[0,T], u(⋅,0)=0 on Ω.

1.1A1F1F5F6given

Define E(t):=12∫Ωu(x,t)2 dx for t∈[0,T]. The maps u and ut are continuous on the compact cylinder [F5], hence bounded by constants M,M1<∞, so [F1] applies with the constant majorant 2MM1 and gives E′(t)=∫Ωu(x,t)ut(x,t) dx for every t∈(0,T); moreover E is continuous on [0,T], since for tk→t the integrands u(⋅,tk)2 converge pointwise to u(⋅,t)2 (continuity of u on Q‾) and are dominated by 4M2, so [F6] gives E(tk)→E(t).

2.1step 1.1F2F3F4given

Substituting ut=Δu into step 1.1 gives E′(t)=∫ΩuΔu dx; [F2] with v=u reads ∫Ω(uΔu+∣Du∣2) dx=∫∂Ωu ∂νu dS, and the boundary term vanishes because u=0 on ∂Ω×[0,T], so E′(t)=−∫Ω∣Du(x,t)∣2dx≤0; hence E is nonincreasing on (0,T) by [F3], and since E(0)=12∫Ωu(x,0)2dx=0 by the zero initial datum, continuity from step 1.1 gives E(t)≤0 and hence E≡0 on [0,T] because E≥0.

3.1step 2.1F7given

For every t, E(t)=0 is the integral of the nonnegative continuous function u(⋅,t)2, so [F7] gives u(x,t)=0 for every x∈Ω; by continuity of u on Q‾ this gives u≡0 on Q‾.

4.1step 3.1given∎

If u1,u2 are two solutions in this class with the same zero initial and lateral data, their difference w:=u1−u2 again satisfies wt−Δw=0 in Q, w=0 on ∂Ω×[0,T] and w(⋅,0)=0 on Ω, so step 3.1 gives w≡0; the Dirichlet problem for the homogeneous heat equation is therefore unique in this class. This is exactly the forward-in-time direction: the argument uses u(⋅,0)=0 and deduces vanishing for larger times, and no terminal data or backward uniqueness is used.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Energy identity for the forced Dirichlet heat equation

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Let n≥2 and let Ω⊂Rn be a bounded C1 domain in the class of the first Green identity (Bounded C1 domains and their outward normals), let T>0, and let real u∈C2,1(Ω‾×[0,T]) solve ut−Δu=f in Ω×(0,T] with f∈C(Ω‾×[0,T]) and u=0 on the lateral boundary ∂Ω×[0,T]. Then for 0<t<T, 12ddt∫Ωu(x,t)2 dx+∫Ω∣Du(x,t)∣2 dx=∫Ωf(x,t)u(x,t) dx, and integrating in t gives the energy balance 12∫Ωu(x,t2)2dx−12∫Ωu(x,t1)2dx+∫t1t2 ⁣∫Ω∣Du∣2 dx dt=∫t1t2 ⁣∫Ωfu dx dt for 0<t1<t2<T. The identity carries exactly the Countable Choice assumption of the Green identity supplier.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, n≥2, a bounded C1 domain Ω, T>0, u∈C2,1(Ω‾×[0,T]) with ut−Δu=f in Ω×(0,T], f continuous, and u=0 on ∂Ω×[0,T].

[A1]

Countable Choice is the ambient hypothesis (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

Differentiation under the integral sign: under the domination and measurability hypotheses of the theorem, F(t)=∫f(x,t) dμ(x) is differentiable with F′=∫∂tf dμ (Differentiation under the integral sign).

[F2]

Green's first identity: for real u∈C2(Ω‾) and v∈C1(Ω‾), ∫Ω(vΔu+Du⋅Dv) dx=∫∂Ωv∂νu dS (First Green identity).

[F3]

If G is differentiable on [a,b] with integrable derivative G′, then ∫abG′=G(b)−G(a) (The second fundamental theorem: if G is differentiable on [a,b] with G′=f and f is integrable, then ∫abf=G(b)−G(a)).

[F5]

The domain class, the outward normal ν, the surface element dS and the conventions C1(Ω‾), C2(Ω‾) are those of Bounded C1 domains and their outward normals.

Proof

Given: Countable Choice, n≥2, a bounded C1 domain Ω in the Green-identity class, T>0, real u∈C2,1(Ω‾×[0,T]) with ut−Δu=f in Ω×(0,T] for continuous f, and u=0 on ∂Ω×[0,T].

1.1A1F1F4given

Define E(t):=12∫Ωu(x,t)2 dx for t∈(0,T). The maps u and ut are continuous on the compact cylinder by [F4], hence bounded there by constants M,M1<∞; the bounded domain has finite measure since it lies in a bounded box (A box in Rn with parameters ai≤bi is Lebesgue measurable of measure ∏i<n(bi−ai), whichever of its faces are included); therefore x↦u(x,t)2 is integrable on Ω for every t, the derivative ∂tu(x,t)2=2u(x,t)ut(x,t) is bounded by 2MM1, and [F1] applies with the constant majorant, giving that E is differentiable on (0,T) with E′(t)=12∫Ω2u(x,t)ut(x,t) dx=∫Ωu(x,t)ut(x,t) dx.

2.1step 1.1F2F5given

Substituting the equation ut=Δu+f from the hypothesis into step 1.1 gives E′(t)=∫ΩuΔu dx+∫Ωfu dx; [F2] with v=u reads ∫Ω(uΔu+∣Du∣2) dx=∫∂Ωu ∂νu dS, and the boundary term vanishes because u=0 on ∂Ω×[0,T], so ∫ΩuΔu dx=−∫Ω∣Du(x,t)∣2dx; hence 12ddt∫Ωu2+∫Ω∣Du∣2=∫Ωfu for every t∈(0,T).

3.1step 2.1F3F4given∎

The three functions of t in the identity of step 2.1 are continuous on (0,T): E′ is given there by the integral of the continuous function uΔu+fu, while t↦∫Ω∣Du∣2dx and t↦∫Ωfu dx are integrals of continuous functions on the compact cylinder [F4], and dominated convergence (Dominated convergence) with these uniform bounds proves their continuity; integrating the identity from t1 to t2 and applying [F3] to the energy term yields the balance 12∫Ωu(x,t2)2dx−12∫Ωu(x,t1)2dx+∫t1t2∫Ω∣Du∣2dx dt=∫t1t2∫Ωfu dx dt for 0<t1<t2<T.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Backward uniqueness for the heat equation on a bounded interval

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Let T>0, Q=(0,π)×(0,T], and say that a function w:Q‾→R is of class C4,2(Q‾) when it is continuous on Q‾ and all ordered partial derivatives containing at most four x derivatives and at most two t derivatives exist on Q and extend continuously to Q‾. Suppose w∈C4,2(Q‾) satisfies wt=wxxin Q,w(0,t)=w(π,t)=0 (0≤t≤T),w(x,T)=0 (0≤x≤π). Then w≡0 on Q‾. No hypothesis on the initial face t=0 is imposed: the vanishing is forced by the lateral and terminal conditions alone. Consequently two solutions of the interval Dirichlet problem in this class with zero lateral data and the same terminal data coincide, and the terminal-to-initial map is well defined on the class of terminal data of such solutions.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, T>0, Q=(0,π)×(0,T], and w∈C4,2(Q‾) with wt=wxx in Q, w(0,t)=w(π,t)=0 for 0≤t≤T and w(x,T)=0 for 0≤x≤π.

[A1]

Countable Choice is the ambient hypothesis (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

If f satisfies the hypotheses of the differentiation-under-the-integral theorem, then F(t)=∫f(x,t) dμ(x) is differentiable with F′=∫∂tf dμ (Differentiation under the integral sign).

[F2]

For u,v differentiable on [a,b] with integrable derivatives, ∫abu v′=u(b)v(b)−u(a)v(a)−∫abu′v (If u,v are differentiable on [a,b] with u′,v′ integrable, then ∫abuv′=u(b)v(b)−u(a)v(a)−∫abu′v).

[F3]

A continuous function on [a,b] is bounded and Riemann integrable (A continuous function on [a,b] is Riemann integrable, by Heine-Cantor and Riemann's criterion).

[F4]

A bounded Riemann integrable function on [a,b] is Lebesgue integrable with the same integral (A bounded Riemann integrable function on a closed bounded interval is Lebesgue measurable and has the same integral).

[F5]

∫∣fg∣≤∥f∥2∥g∥2 for f,g∈L2 (Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for L2).

[F6]

A twice differentiable function on an open interval is convex exactly when its second derivative is nonnegative (A twice-differentiable function on an open interval is convex if and only if its second derivative is nonnegative).

[F8]

log⁡:(0,∞)→R is continuous, strictly increasing and onto R, with log⁡(xy)=log⁡x+log⁡y and log⁡1=0 (Order, continuity, range, and the product, quotient, and reciprocal laws for the natural logarithm).

[F11]

Dominated convergence (Dominated convergence).

Proof

Given: Countable Choice, T>0, w∈C4,2(Q‾) with wt=wxx in Q, w(0,t)=w(π,t)=0 for 0≤t≤T, and w(x,T)=0 for 0≤x≤π.

1.1A1F3F4F10F11given

Define E(t):=12∫0πw(x,t)2 dx for t∈[0,T]; the integrand is continuous on the compact interval, hence Lebesgue integrable by [F3] and [F4]. If tk→t in [0,T], then w(x,tk)2→w(x,t)2 for every x by continuity of w on Q‾, and [F10] bounds w by some M<∞, so the constant 4M2 dominates all integrands and [F11] gives E(tk)→E(t); thus E is continuous on [0,T].

1.2F1F10given

For fixed t∈(0,T) the map x↦w(x,t)2 is integrable, for every x the map s↦w(x,s)2 is differentiable on (0,T) with derivative 2w(x,s)wt(x,s), and [F10] bounds w and wt by constants M,M1<∞, so ∣2wwt∣≤2MM1 everywhere; [F1] therefore applies and gives E′(t)=12∫0π2w(x,t)wt(x,t) dx=∫0πw(x,t)wt(x,t) dx for every t∈(0,T).

2.1step 1.2F2F3F4given

On (0,T) the equation wt=wxx turns step 1.2 into E′(t)=∫0πw wxx dx; the functions x↦w(x,t) and x↦wx(x,t) are continuously differentiable on [0,π] with continuous, hence integrable derivatives by [F3], so [F2] gives ∫0πw wxx dx=[w wx]0π−∫0πwx2 dx=−∫0πwx(x,t)2 dx, the boundary term vanishing because w(0,t)=w(π,t)=0 for all t; the Riemann integrals equal the Lebesgue integrals by [F4], so E′(t)=−∫0πwx(x,t)2 dx≤0.

2.2step 1.2F1F2F3F4F10given

Applying [F1] to x↦wx(x,t)2, with wx and wxt bounded on the compact rectangle by [F10], gives E′′(t)=−2∫0πwx(x,t)wxt(x,t) dx for t∈(0,T); [F2] applied to u=wx(⋅,t) and v=wt(⋅,t) gives ∫0πwxwxt=[wxwt]0π−∫0πwxxwt=−∫0πwxxwt dx, since wt(0,t)=wt(π,t)=0 by differentiating the boundary identities in t: the continuous extensions of wt are those derivatives, since the interior identity w(x,b)−w(x,a)=∫abwt(x,s)ds passes to x=0,π by uniform continuity on [a,b]; substituting wxx=wt yields E′′(t)=2∫0πwt(x,t)2 dx≥0.

3.1step 1.2step 2.2F5F6F7F9F12F13given

By [F5] and steps 1.2 and 2.2, E′(t)2=(∫0πwwt)2≤(∫0πw2)(∫0πwt2)=E(t)E′′(t) for t∈(0,T); hence on every interval on which E>0, the function L:=log⁡∘E is twice differentiable with L′=E′/E and L′′=E′′/E−(E′/E)2≥0 by [F9] and [F12], so L is convex there by [F6] and [F7].

4.1step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1F7F8F13given

If E were positive somewhere, continuity and E(T)=0 would give t0∈(0,T) with E(t0)>0. By step 2.1 and [F13], E is nonincreasing; fix s∈(0,t0), so E(s)>0. The nonempty closed set {t∈[t0,T]:E(t)=0} has a least element b>t0, with E>0 on [s,b) and E(b)=0. For t0<t<b, convexity from step 3.1 yields L(t0)≤t−t0t−sL(s)+t0−st−sL(t). As t↑b, L(t)→−∞ by continuity of E and [F8], its coefficient tends to (t0−s)/(b−s)>0, and the other term is bounded. This contradicts the finite L(t0). Hence E≡0 on [0,T].

5.1step 4.1given∎

Since E≡0 and E(t)=12∫0πw(x,t)2dx with a nonnegative continuous integrand, w(x,t)=0 for every x∈[0,π] and every t∈[0,T]: if w(x0,t)≠0, continuity in x gives w2>0 on a nondegenerate interval, making E(t)>0. Thus w≡0 on Q‾; if u1,u2 are two C4,2 solutions with the same terminal data and zero lateral data, their difference satisfies the hypotheses, so u1=u2 and the terminal-to-initial map on the terminal data of such solutions is well defined.

DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

The Duhamel heat potential

Definition

Assume Countable Choice. Let n≥1, T>0, 1≤p≤∞, and let f:[0,T]→Lp(Rn) be continuous, where Lp is the quotient space of The space Lp(μ) as the quotient by null functions. For 0≤t≤T the heat potential of f is the Bochner integral Df(t):=∫0tHt−sf(s) ds ∈ Lp(Rn), where H is the heat evolution of The heat evolution Ht of initial data and the integrand is the Lp-valued function s↦Ht−sf(s) interpreted as in Bochner-integrable function and Strongly measurable Banach-valued function.

Well-definedness. The target Lp is Banach by Riesz-Fischer completeness of Lp for 1≤p≤∞ under the declared Countable Choice. For 1≤p<∞ the map s↦Ht−sf(s) is norm continuous on [0,t] as a composition of the continuous curve f and the strongly continuous heat flow The heat Cauchy problem for Lp data; its range is therefore separable. For p=∞ strong continuity at time zero is not available, but the flow is norm continuous on every compact subinterval of (0,∞) by the L1 continuity of the positive-time kernels (for a≤τ≤b the explicit kernels converge pointwise with a common integrable Gaussian majorant, so Dominated convergence gives L1 continuity, and Young gives operator-norm continuity), so for fixed t the integrand is norm continuous on every compact subinterval of [0,t) and may be approximated on a countable exhaustion of [0,t) by finite-valued mesh functions, extended by zero on the omitted tail; uniform mesh error at most 1/k on [0,t−t/(k+1)] gives pointwise convergence at every s<t; the single endpoint value at s=t is irrelevant for the integral. In both cases the integrand is strongly measurable, and the contraction estimate of Monotonicity and Lp contractivity of the heat flow gives ∥Ht−sf(s)∥p≤∥f(s)∥p, so ∫0t∥Ht−sf(s)∥p ds≤∫0t∥f(s)∥p ds≤Tsup⁡[0,T]∥f∥p<∞. The Bochner integrability criterion Bochner integrability criterion therefore makes Df(t) a well-defined element of Lp(Rn), and the norm inequality for Bochner integrals Bochner integral norm inequality gives the estimate ∥Df(t)∥p≤∫0t∥f(s)∥p ds.

The same definition is used when f is merely strongly measurable with ∫0T∥f(s)∥p ds<∞ and 1≤p<∞: approximation by measurable finite-valued simple functions together with the contraction bound gives strong measurability of the integrand: for the k-th simple approximation, replace its finitely many positive-time flow curves by finite mesh functions with error at most 1/k on [0,t−t/(k+1)], and put zero on the omitted tail. At every s<t off the original null set the resulting simple functions converge to Ht−sf(s) (Strongly measurable Banach-valued function, Dominated convergence), and the criterion and estimate above apply verbatim.

When f:Rn×[0,T]→R is bounded and jointly continuous, the scalar heat potential is u(t,x):=∫0t∫RnΓ(x−y,t−s)f(y,s) dy ds, a scalar potential defined by the convolution Convolution of two functions on Rn; the inner integral is absolutely convergent because Γ(⋅,t−s) has unit mass Normalisation, parabolic scaling, heat equation and derivative bounds for the heat kernel and f is bounded. Whenever the forcing also defines a Bochner integrable Lp-valued map, the scalar potential agrees with the Bochner potential almost everywhere. Indeed, for any bounded measurable test function ψ supported in a bounded set, the pairing v↦∫ψv is bounded on Lp by Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases, and it commutes with the Bochner integral (Bounded linear maps commute with Bochner integration). The iterated scalar integral is absolutely integrable against ψ, bounded by T∥f∥∞∥ψ∥1, so Fubini (Tonelli and Fubini for the completed product, with only almost-everywhere section measurability) gives the same pairing for the scalar potential. Equality of all these pairings forces equality almost everywhere: on each bounded box, a positive or negative real or imaginary part of the difference on a measurable set of positive measure would give a nonzero pairing with that set's indicator.

Remarks

  • Why the p=∞ clause is worded as it is. Positive-time smoothing does not give strong continuity of Ht at t=0 in the supremum norm, so the definition claims norm continuity of the integrand only on compact subintervals of [0,t) when p=∞, and does not need a continuity assertion for Df. For 1≤p<∞ the strong continuity of The heat Cauchy problem for Lp data is available and no such caveat is needed.

  • Choice accounting. Countable Choice is declared as the ambient hypothesis and enters only through the cited integration theory and heat-flow suppliers; the definition itself makes no selection and no countable exhaustion beyond the explicit intervals used above.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

L1 in time estimate for Lp Duhamel forcing

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Let 1≤p≤∞, and let f:[0,T]→Lp(Rn) be strongly measurable with ∫0T∥f(s)∥p ds<∞. For every t the Bochner integral Df(t)=∫0tHt−sf(s) ds exists and satisfies ∥Df(t)∥p≤∫0t∥f(s)∥p ds. For p=∞ no strong continuity of H at zero on all L∞ is asserted. For merely weakly measurable L∞ forcing this statement makes no existence assertion.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, 1≤p≤∞, a strongly measurable f:[0,T]→Lp(Rn) with ∫0T∥f(s)∥p ds<∞, and 0<t≤T.

[A1]

Countable Choice is the ambient hypothesis (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

Strong measurability: there are measurable simple functions sk and a null set N with ∥sk(ω)−f(ω)∥→0 for every ω∉N (Strongly measurable Banach-valued function).

[F2]

For 1≤p<∞ the heat flow is strongly continuous at zero, so Ht+s=HtHs and ∥Hτg−g∥p→0 as τ↓0; and ∥Hτg∥p≤∥g∥p for all p and τ≥0 (The heat Cauchy problem for Lp data, Monotonicity and Lp contractivity of the heat flow).

[F3]

The kernel satisfies ∣DxαΓ(x,τ)∣≤Cn,ατ−(∣α∣+n)/2e−∣x∣2/(8τ) for all τ>0 (Normalisation, parabolic scaling, heat equation and derivative bounds for the heat kernel), and ∂τΓ=ΔxΓ there.

[F4]

Dominated convergence (Dominated convergence), Young's inequality ∥K∗g∥q≤∥K∥1∥g∥q (Young's convolution inequality under Countable Choice).

[F5]

The heat potential Df(t) is defined as the Bochner integral ∫0tHt−sf(s) ds once the integrand is Bochner integrable, the criterion being strong measurability together with finiteness of the integral of the norm (The Duhamel heat potential, Bochner integrability criterion).

[F6]

Lp is complete for 1≤p≤∞ under Countable Choice (Riesz-Fischer completeness of Lp for 1≤p≤∞), so these Bochner integrals have Banach-space targets.

Proof

Given: Countable Choice, 1≤p≤∞, a strongly measurable f:[0,T]→Lp(Rn) with ∫0T∥f(s)∥p ds<∞, and 0<t≤T.

1.1A1F1F2given

Let 1≤p<∞. The map Φ(s,g):=Ht−sg is jointly norm continuous on [0,t]×Lp(Rn): ∥Ht−sg−Ht−s′g′∥p≤∥g−g′∥p+∥(Ht−s−Ht−s′)g′∥p by [F2], and the second term tends to 0 as s→s′ by strong continuity at zero applied to the semigroup difference. If fk are the simple approximations of [F1], the functions s↦Φ(s,fk(s)) are strongly measurable: for each of the finitely many values g of fk, the continuous curve s↦Ht−sg on [0,t] is uniformly approximated by finite-valued mesh functions; multiply these approximations by the measurable level-set indicators of fk and add them, Choosing mesh error at most 1/k for the finitely many curves associated with fk yields a single sequence of finite-valued measurable approximations; contractions and fk→f show that this sequence converges pointwise off the original null set to Ht−sf(s). This proves strong measurability directly from [F1].

2.1A1F1F3F4given

Let p=∞ and let 0<δ<t. For fixed g∈L∞(Rn) and δ≤τ,τ′≤t, [F3], [F4] and ∂τΓ=ΔΓ give ∥Γτ−Γτ′∥1≤∫01∥∂τΓτ′+u(τ−τ′)∥1du ∣τ−τ′∣≤Cδ∣τ−τ′∣ with Cδ<∞, so τ↦Hτg is norm continuous on [δ,t] by [F4] (Young's inequality with ∥K∥1); consequently Φ is jointly norm continuous on [0,t−δ]×L∞ and the argument of step 1.1 makes s↦Ht−sf(s) strongly measurable on [0,t−δ]. Take the countable exhaustion [0,t−t/(m+1)], m≥1. For each simple approximation fk, approximate its finitely many continuous flow curves uniformly on these intervals by finite mesh functions. On the k-th interval choose error at most 1/k and set the approximation to zero on the omitted tail. At every s<t off the original null set, these finite-valued measurable functions tend to Ht−sf(s), because contractions also give ∥Ht−s(fk(s)−f(s))∥∞≤∥fk(s)−f(s)∥∞. The single endpoint has measure zero. This proves strong measurability on [0,t] directly from [F1].

3.1step 1.1step 2.1F2F5F6given

In both cases the contraction bound [F2] gives ∥Ht−sf(s)∥p≤∥f(s)∥p, so ∫0t∥Ht−sf(s)∥p ds≤∫0t∥f(s)∥p ds≤∫0T∥f(s)∥p ds<∞; the Bochner integrability criterion [F5] therefore makes Df(t)=∫0tHt−sf(s) ds a well-defined element of Lp(Rn), and the norm inequality for Bochner integrals Bochner integral norm inequality gives ∥Df(t)∥p≤∫0t∥f(s)∥p ds.

4.1step 3.1given∎

The construction claims no continuity of the integrand at s=t nor of H at zero when p=∞: strong measurability of the integrand, which is all that integrability needs, was proved only up to null sets; and for forcing that is merely weakly measurable, no strong measurability of s↦Ht−sf(s) is available, so no existence of the Bochner integral is asserted in that case. This proves the theorem with the stated caveats.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Maximum principle on the whole space under Gaussian growth

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Let T>0, a≥0, A<∞, and let u∈C([0,T]×Rn)∩C1,2((0,T]×Rn) satisfy ut−Δu≤0,u(t,x)≤Aea∣x∣2((t,x)∈[0,T]×Rn). Then sup⁡[0,T]×Rnu≤sup⁡Rnu(0,⋅). (The same statement holds for a finite union of consecutive strips of length less than 1/(4a) when a>0.)

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, T>0, a≥0, A<∞, and a continuous u on the closed strip, C1,2 in positive time, with ut−Δu≤0 and u(t,x)≤Aea∣x∣2.

[A1]

Countable Choice is the ambient hypothesis (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

The weak maximum principle on a bounded cylinder BR(0)×(0,T]: a C2,1 subsolution attains its maximum on the parabolic boundary (Weak parabolic maximum principle, Parabolic cylinder and parabolic boundary).

Proof

Given: Countable Choice, T>0, a≥0, A<∞, and u satisfying the subsolution inequality and the Gaussian growth bound.

1.1A1F2F3given

Put M:=sup⁡Rnu(0,⋅). If M=+∞ the conclusion is immediate, so assume M<∞ (it is greater than −∞ since the initial trace is real valued). Assume first aT<1/4; choose δ>0 with b:=14(T+δ)>a, which is possible under this assumption because 1/(4T)>a and δ↦1/(4(T+δ)) is continuous with value 1/(4T) at δ=0, and set B(t,x):=(T+δ−t)−n/2e∣x∣2/[4(T+δ−t)] for t≤T; writing τ=T+δ−t and differentiating, [F2] gives Bt=(n2τ+∣x∣24τ2)B=ΔB, so (∂t−Δ)B=0 and v:=u−εB satisfies (∂t−Δ)v≤0 for every ε>0.

2.1step 1.1F2F3given

For every ε>0 there is R with v(t,x)≤M for all ∣x∣≥R and all t∈[0,T]: indeed B(t,x)≥(T+δ)−n/2eb∣x∣2 and u≤Aea∣x∣2, so v≤Aea∣x∣2−ε(T+δ)−n/2eb∣x∣2, whose right-hand side tends to −∞ as ∣x∣→∞ because b>a and exponentials dominate constants and polynomials [F3]; hence it is at most the fixed value M for ∣x∣≥R. On the initial slice v(0,x)=u(0,x)−εB(0,x)≤u(0,x)≤M, since B(0,x)>0.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1F1F3given

Fix ε>0 and R as in step 2.1. For 0<h<T, v has all required derivatives continuous on B‾R×[h,T], so [F1] applies on this positive-time cylinder. Continuity on B‾R×[0,T] gives ηh:=max⁡(0,max⁡B‾Rv(h,⋅)−M)→0 as h↓0, because v(0,⋅)≤M. Its lateral values are at most M by step 2.1, hence [F1] gives v≤M+ηh for h≤t≤T in the ball. At each fixed positive time let h↓0; combining with step 2.1 outside the ball gives v≤M on the whole closed strip. Letting ε↓0 gives u≤M when aT<1/4.

4.1step 3.1F3given∎

If aT≥1/4, choose an integer N>4aT and divide [0,T] into the N equal intervals [kT/N,(k+1)T/N]. Each has positive length T/N<1/(4a) and inherits the same Gaussian bound. Apply the short-strip case to the time-translated function on each interval. On the first interval its supremum is at most M, and inductively the initial supremum of each subsequent strip is at most M. Thus u≤M throughout [0,T]×Rn, with no time-zero derivative assumption.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Uniqueness for the whole-space heat equation under Gaussian growth

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Let T>0, C<∞, a≥0, and let u∈C([0,T]×Rn)∩C1,2((0,T]×Rn) satisfy ut−Δu=0 on Rn×(0,T), u(0,⋅)=0 and ∣u(t,x)∣≤Cea∣x∣2((t,x)∈[0,T]×Rn). Then u≡0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, T>0, C<∞, a≥0, and u in the stated class with ut−Δu=0 on Rn×(0,T), u(0,⋅)=0 and ∣u∣≤Cea∣x∣2 on the closed strip.

[A1]

Countable Choice is the ambient hypothesis (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

Whole-space maximum principle under Gaussian growth: if w∈C([0,T]×Rn)∩C1,2((0,T]×Rn) satisfies wt−Δw≤0 and w(t,x)≤Aea∣x∣2 on the closed strip, then sup⁡[0,T]×Rnw≤sup⁡Rnw(0,⋅), the finite subdivision into strips being available by the Archimedean property (Maximum principle on the whole space under Gaussian growth, Every complete ordered field is Archimedean).

Proof

Given: Countable Choice, T>0, C<∞, a≥0, and u satisfying ut−Δu=0 on the open strip, u(0,⋅)=0 and ∣u∣≤Cea∣x∣2 on the closed strip.

1.1A1F1given

The function u satisfies the hypotheses of [F1]: it lies in the stated class, ut−Δu=0≤0 on Rn×(0,T), and u≤∣u∣≤Cea∣x∣2 on the closed strip. Hence [F1] gives sup⁡[0,T]×Rnu≤sup⁡Rnu(0,⋅)=0, that is u≤0 everywhere on the strip.

2.1step 1.1F1F2given

By [F2] the function −u also lies in the class, with (−u)t−Δ(−u)=−(ut−Δu)=0≤0 on the open strip and (−u)(0,⋅)=0; moreover −u≤∣u∣≤Cea∣x∣2 on the closed strip. So [F2] and [F1] apply to −u and give sup⁡(−u)≤sup⁡(−u)(0,⋅)=0, that is u≥0 everywhere on the strip.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1F1given∎

Steps 1.1 and 2.1 give u≤0≤u on [0,T]×Rn, hence u≡0; the only choices made are the finite subdivisions supplied by the Archimedean property inside [F1], and Countable Choice is inherited from that supplier.

TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Duhamel principle for the whole-space heat equation

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. (i) Classical case. Let f be bounded and jointly continuous on Rn×[0,T], and suppose there are C>0 and 0<γ≤1 such that ∣f(x,s)−f(y,s)∣≤C∣x−y∣γ for all x,y and 0≤s≤T (in particular smooth compactly supported forcing qualifies) and define the scalar heat potential u(t,x):=∫0t∫RnΓ(x−y,t−s)f(y,s) dy ds. Then u∈C1,2(Rn×(0,T]), ut−Δu=f on Rn×(0,T) and u(0,⋅)=0.

(ii) Mild case. Let 1≤p<∞ and f∈C([0,T];Lp(Rn)). Then Df∈C([0,T];Lp(Rn)), Df(0)=0, and Df satisfies the forced semigroup relation Df(t)=Ht−sDf(s)+∫stHt−τf(τ) dτ(0<s<t≤T). Every element w∈C([0,T];Lp(Rn)) with w(0)=0 satisfying this relation equals Df. If moreover ∣u(x,t)∣≤Cea∣x∣2 for a classical solution u with zero initial data, then u is the potential of (i) uniquely in that growth class.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, T>0, a bounded jointly continuous f on Rn×[0,T] uniformly spatially γ-Hölder with constants C,γ, M:=sup⁡∣f∣<∞, and (for the mild clause) 1≤p<∞ and f∈C([0,T];Lp(Rn)).

[A1]

Countable Choice is the ambient hypothesis (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

Heat kernel: Γ is C∞ on Rn×(0,∞) with ∂τΓ=ΔΓ and ∫RnΓ(z,τ) dz=1, and for every multi-index α there is Cn,α<∞ with ∣DzαΓ(z,τ)∣≤Cn,ατ−(n+∣α∣)/2e−∣z∣2/(8τ) (The heat kernel on Rn and its causal extension, Normalisation, parabolic scaling, heat equation and derivative bounds for the heat kernel); for positive times the spatial and time derivatives of x↦∫Γ(x−y,τ)g(y) dy pass through the convolution (Spatial and time derivatives pass through heat convolution for positive time).

[F2]

Differentiation under the integral sign: if x↦f(x,y) is integrable for every x, differentiable for almost every y, and the x-derivative is dominated by an integrable function uniformly on the parameter set, then the derivative of the integral is the integral of the derivative (Differentiation under the integral sign); dominated convergence is Dominated convergence. On a closed interval, a locally uniformly convergent family of C1 functions whose derivatives converge locally uniformly has limit derivative equal to the limit of the derivatives (If continuously differentiable functions converge at one point and their derivatives converge uniformly on a closed interval, then the functions converge uniformly to a differentiable function whose derivative is the derivative limit).

[F4]

Bochner integration: the heat potential Df(t)=∫0tHt−sf(s) ds is a well-defined element of Lp with ∥Df(t)∥p≤∫0t∥f(s)∥p ds (The Duhamel heat potential, Bochner integral norm inequality); dominated convergence holds for Bochner integrals (Bochner dominated convergence theorem), and bounded linear operators commute with the Bochner integral (Bounded linear maps commute with Bochner integration).

[F5]

Heat flow: H is a contraction semigroup on Lp, Ht+s=HtHs and ∥Htg∥p≤∥g∥p, and for 1≤p<∞ it is strongly continuous, Htg→g in Lp as t↓0 (The heat evolution Ht of initial data, The heat Cauchy problem for Lp data).

[F6]

Whole-space uniqueness: a C1,2 classical solution of the homogeneous heat equation on the strip with zero initial data and Gaussian growth ∣u∣≤Cea∣x∣2 vanishes identically (Uniqueness for the whole-space heat equation under Gaussian growth); the Laplacian is Δ=∑i∂i∂i (The Laplacian of a C2 function and of a C2 vector field).

Proof

Given: Countable Choice, T>0, bounded jointly continuous uniformly spatially γ-Hölder f with 0<γ≤1 and M=sup⁡∣f∣, and (for the mild clause) 1≤p<∞ with f∈C([0,T];Lp(Rn)).

1.1A1F1given

For (t,x)∈[0,T]×Rn the double integral defining u converges absolutely, because ∬Γ(x−y,t−s)∣f(y,s)∣ dy ds≤M∫0t∥Γ(⋅,t−s)∥1 ds=Mt by the unit mass of [F1]; hence u is well defined, ∣u(t,x)∣≤Mt, and u(0,⋅)=0 since the s-integral is over the empty interval. Substituting τ=t−s, u(t,x)=∫0t(Γτ∗f(⋅,t−τ))(x) dτ, the convolution being that of [F1].

1.2A1F4F5given

In the mild setting, write Df(t)=∫0T1{s<t}Ht−sf(s)ds. If tj→t, the integrands converge in Lp for every s≠t, by positive-time strong continuity when s<t and eventual vanishing when s>t. Their norms are bounded by the integrable function ∥f(s)∥p. Thus Bochner dominated convergence [F4] gives Df(tj)→Df(t), including at t=0, where Df(0)=0.

1.3F1F2given

Fix t>0 and ∣α∣≤2, and define the candidate vα(t,x):=∫0t∫RnDαΓ(x−y,τ)f(y,t−τ) dy dτ. The inner integral converges absolutely with a τ-majorant integrable on (0,t): for ∣α∣=0 the unit mass gives the bound M, and for ∣α∣=1 the Gaussian bound gives ∫∣DαΓ(z,τ)∣dz≤Cn,α(8π)n/2τ−1/2, so the inner integral is bounded by a constant times Mτ−1/2; for ∣α∣=2, differentiating ∫RnΓ(ξ+z,τ) dz=1 in ξ at ξ=0 by [F2] with the Gaussian majorant of [F1] gives ∫RnDαΓ(z,τ) dz=0, so the inner integral equals ∫DαΓ(z,τ)[f(x−z,t−τ)−f(x,t−τ)] dz, of absolute value at most CCn,α∫∣z∣γτ−(n+2)/2e−∣z∣2/(8τ)dz=C′Cτ−1+γ/2, integrable at τ=0 since γ>0. Dominated convergence over the parameter (t,x) with these majorants makes each vα continuous on Rn×(0,T].

2.1step 1.2F4F5given

In the mild setting Df satisfies the forced semigroup relation: for 0<s<t≤T, splitting Df(t)=∫0sHt−τf(τ) dτ+∫stHt−τf(τ) dτ and using Ht−τ=Ht−sHs−τ for τ<s together with [F4], the first integral equals Ht−s∫0sHs−τf(τ) dτ=Ht−sDf(s), so Df(t)=Ht−sDf(s)+∫stHt−τf(τ) dτ.

2.2step 1.3F1F2given

The candidate formulas of step 1.3 are the spatial derivatives of u: for δ>0 put uδ(t,x):=∫δt∫Γ(x−y,τ)f(y,t−τ) dy dτ. On the strip τ≥δ the kernel derivatives are uniformly dominated by an integrable function, so [F2] gives Dxαuδ(t,x)=∫δt∫DαΓ(x−y,τ)f(y,t−τ) dy dτ with uδ spatially C∞; by the majorants of step 1.3, uδ→u and Dxαuδ→vα uniformly on compact subsets of Rn×(0,T] as δ↓0. Applying [F2]'s interval statement along each coordinate direction (the functions h↦uδ(t,x+hei) are C1 with derivatives Deiuδ(t,x+hei)→vei(t,x+hei) uniformly on compact h-intervals) gives Deiu=vei for every i; repeating the argument with the family h↦veiδ(t,x+hej), whose h-derivatives converge uniformly to vei+ej, gives ∂j∂iu=vei+ej. Hence u has continuous spatial derivatives of every order ∣α∣≤2, equal to the corresponding vα.

3.1step 1.2step 2.1F5given

Mild uniqueness: if w∈C([0,T];Lp(Rn)) with w(0)=0 satisfies the forced relation of step 2.1, then v:=w−Df is continuous with v(0)=0 and satisfies v(t)=Ht−sv(s) for all 0<s<t≤T; the contraction bound of [F5] gives ∥v(t)∥p≤∥v(s)∥p for every s∈(0,t), and letting s↓0 with continuity at 0 gives ∥v(t)∥p=0, so w=Df and the mild solution with zero data is unique.

3.2step 1.1step 1.3step 2.2F1F2F6given

Fix a compact positive-time interval [a,b]⊂(0,T] and 0<δ<a. The same truncated potential as in step 2.2 is uδ(t,x)=∫0t−δ(Γt−s∗f(⋅,s))(x)ds. Differentiation under the integral and its continuous moving endpoint give ∂tuδ=(Γδ∗f(⋅,t−δ))(x)+∫0t−δ(ΔΓt−s∗f(⋅,s))(x)ds. The endpoint derivative follows by splitting the increment into the added interval, whose average tends to the endpoint integrand by continuity, and the old interval, where [F2] applies away from zero depth. The first term tends locally uniformly to f(x,t): the spatial Hölder bound gives ∣Γδ∗f(⋅,t−δ)−f(⋅,t−δ)∣≤C∫Γδ(z)∣z∣γdz=C1δγ/2, and joint continuity controls f(x,t−δ)−f(x,t) on compact sets. By the second-derivative cancellation estimate of step 1.3, the second term tends locally uniformly to ∑iv2ei=Δu, with omitted tail bounded by C2δγ/2. Thus uδ→u and ∂tuδ→f+Δu uniformly on compact space-time sets. The uniform derivative-limit theorem [F2] on [a,b] proves the two-sided time derivative in (0,T) and the left derivative at T, with continuous value ut=f+Δu. Together with step 2.2 and ∣u∣≤Mt, this proves the classical clause and continuity at zero.

4.1step 1.1step 3.2F6given∎

Classical uniqueness: let u be a classical solution with zero initial data and ∣u(t,x)∣≤Cea∣x∣2 whose forcing f satisfies the hypotheses of (i), and let u∗ be the potential of (i), which by steps 1.1 and 3.2 is classical with ut∗−Δu∗=f, u∗(0,⋅)=0 and ∣u∗∣≤TM on the strip. Then w:=u−u∗ is continuous on the closed strip, C1,2 in positive time, solves the homogeneous heat equation with zero initial data, and obeys ∣w∣≤(C+TM)ea∣x∣2 because ea∣x∣2≥1 for a≥0; [F6] gives w≡0, so u=u∗ is the potential of (i), the unique classical solution with zero initial data in the Gaussian growth class.

TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

The inhomogeneous heat Cauchy formula

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Let n≥1, T>0, 1≤p<∞, u0∈Lp(Rn) and f∈C([0,T];Lp(Rn)). Define u(t):=Htu0+Df(t)=Htu0+∫0tHt−sf(s) ds(0≤t≤T). Then u∈C([0,T];Lp(Rn)), u(0)=u0, and u satisfies the forced relation u(t)=Ht−su(s)+∫stHt−τf(τ) dτ(0<s<t≤T); conversely every w∈C([0,T];Lp(Rn)) with w(0)=u0 satisfying this relation equals u. If u0 is bounded and uniformly continuous and f is bounded and jointly continuous and uniformly spatially Hölder on [0,T] as in the Duhamel theorem, then u is a classical solution of ut−Δu=f with u(⋅,0)=u0, and it is the unique classical solution in the Gaussian growth class. For bounded uniformly continuous u0 and bounded jointly uniformly continuous f without the Hölder assumption, the same scalar formula remains a bounded continuous mild solution with the forced semigroup relation and initial trace u0; the C1,2 upgrade is not claimed for that general forcing class.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, n≥1, T>0, 1≤p<∞, u0∈Lp(Rn) and f∈C([0,T];Lp(Rn)); for the classical clause a bounded uniformly continuous u0 and a bounded jointly continuous uniformly spatially Hölder f; for the last clause a bounded uniformly continuous u0 and a bounded jointly uniformly continuous f.

[A1]

Countable Choice is the ambient hypothesis (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

Heat flow: H is a contraction semigroup on Lp, Ht+s=HtHs, ∥Htg∥p≤∥g∥p, and for 1≤p<∞ it is strongly continuous (The heat evolution Ht of initial data, The heat Cauchy problem for Lp data).

[F2]

Duhamel principle: in the mild setting Df(t)=∫0tHt−sf(s) ds lies in C([0,T];Lp), Df(0)=0, satisfies Df(t)=Ht−sDf(s)+∫stHt−τf(τ) dτ and is the unique such zero-data curve; in the classical setting, if f is bounded, jointly continuous and uniformly spatially Hölder, its scalar potential u∗(t,x)=∫0t∫Γ(x−y,t−s)f(y,s) dy ds is C1,2 with ut∗−Δu∗=f and u∗(0,⋅)=0, and it is the unique classical solution with zero initial data in every Gaussian growth class (Duhamel principle for the whole-space heat equation).

[F3]

Classical homogeneous flow: for bounded uniformly continuous u0, the function (t,x)↦∫Γ(x−y,t)u0(y) dy for t>0 and u0 at t=0 is C∞ in positive time, solves the homogeneous heat equation, is bounded by ∥u0∥∞ and converges locally uniformly to u0 at t=0 (The heat Cauchy problem for bounded uniformly continuous data); a C1,2 solution of the homogeneous equation with zero initial data and Gaussian growth vanishes identically (Uniqueness for the whole-space heat equation under Gaussian growth).

[F4]

Bochner integration: for Lp-valued integrable curves the Bochner integral is additive over the splitting of the interval and obeys the norm estimate ∥∫f dμ∥≤∫∥f∥ dμ (Bochner integral norm inequality, Bochner dominated convergence theorem).

[F5]

For the last clause: the kernels form an L1 approximate identity, so sup⁡x∈K∣∫Γ(x−y,σ)g(y) dy−g(x)∣→0 as σ↓0 for every bounded continuous g and compact K (L1 approximate identities converge uniformly on compacta for bounded continuous functions, Normalisation, parabolic scaling, heat equation and derivative bounds for the heat kernel); the kernels satisfy the semigroup law Γt∗Γs=Γt+s and Fubini-Tonelli applies to the nonnegative iterated integrals of the scalar potentials (The heat kernel semigroup identity Γt∗Γs=Γt+s, Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product).

Proof

Given: Countable Choice, 1≤p<∞, u0∈Lp(Rn), f∈C([0,T];Lp(Rn)), and the data of the classical and bounded-continuous clauses.

1.1A1F1F2given

In the mild setting u=H⋅u0+Df∈C([0,T];Lp(Rn)) and u(0)=u0: the curve t↦Htu0 is continuous by the strong continuity and semigroup law of [F1], the curve Df is continuous with Df(0)=0 by [F2], and H0u0=u0; a sum of continuous curves is continuous.

1.2F3F5given

In the bounded-continuous setting the same scalar formula is well defined, bounded and continuous with initial trace u0. Boundedness: ∣u(t,x)∣≤∥u0∥∞+t∥f∥∞. Continuity and initial trace: the homogeneous term is continuous in (t,x) for t>0 and converges to u0 locally uniformly as t↓0 by [F3], while the potential can be written ∫0T1{τ<t}(Γτ∗f(⋅,t−τ))(x)dτ. For (xj,tj)→(x,t), joint uniform continuity of f gives convergence of the integrands at each fixed τ≠t; they are bounded by ∥f∥∞, so Dominated convergence gives continuity. Its bound t∥f∥∞ also gives uniform vanishing at zero; finally the scalar forced relation u(t,x)=∫Γ(x−y,t−s)u(s,y) dy+∫st∫Γ(x−y,t−τ)f(y,τ) dy dτ for 0<s<t≤T follows from the semigroup law and Fubini-Tonelli applied to the real and imaginary positive and negative parts of the absolutely integrable iterated integrands (bounded by kernel masses times the data bounds), using Tonelli and Fubini for the completed product, with only almost-everywhere section measurability: the homogeneous term convolves to Γt∗u0=Γt−s∗(Γs∗u0) and the double integral splits at s. No differentiation of f is used, so no C1,2 claim is made here.

2.1step 1.1F2F3given

In the classical setting, u is a classical solution with the stated data and is unique in the Gaussian growth class. Indeed Htu0 is, by [F3], C∞ in positive time with ∂t(Htu0)=Δ(Htu0) and initial data u0, while the scalar potential u∗ of [F2] is C1,2 with ut∗−Δu∗=f and zero initial data; hence the scalar formula u=H⋅u0+u∗ is C1,2 on Rn×(0,T] with ut−Δu=f and u(⋅,0)=u0. If u~ is another classical solution with the same data and ∣u~∣≤Cea∣x∣2, then w:=u~−u is a C1,2 solution of the homogeneous equation with zero initial data and Gaussian growth (the sum of the two growth bounds), so [F3] forces w≡0 and u~=u.

2.2step 1.1F1F2F4given

The mild curve of step 1.1 satisfies the forced relation: for 0<s<t≤T, subtracting Ht−su(s) from u(t) and using the semigroup law of [F1] together with the relation for Df in [F2] and the additivity of the Bochner integral [F4] gives u(t)−Ht−su(s)=(Htu0−Ht−sHsu0)+(Df(t)−Ht−sDf(s))=∫stHt−τf(τ) dτ.

3.1step 1.1step 2.2F1F4given∎

Mild uniqueness: if w∈C([0,T];Lp(Rn)) with w(0)=u0 satisfies the relation, then v:=w−u is continuous with v(0)=0 and satisfies v(t)=Ht−sv(s) for all 0<s<t≤T; the contraction bound of [F1] gives ∥v(t)∥p≤∥v(s)∥p for every s∈(0,t), and letting s↓0 with continuity of v at 0 gives ∥v(t)∥p=0. Hence w=u, and all clauses of the statement are proved; the only choices made are finitely many thresholds, and Countable Choice is inherited from the cited suppliers.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Instantaneous smoothing of the Lp heat flow

Statement

Assume Countable Choice, let n≥1, 1≤p≤q≤∞ and let Q be the Young exponent of Lp to Lq smoothing estimate for the heat flow. For every f∈Lp(Rn) the integral representative u(x,t):=∫RnΓ(x−y,t)f(y) dy is C∞ on Rn×(0,∞) and satisfies ut=Δu there; moreover for every multi-index α and every integer m≥0, Dxα∂tmu=(ΔxmDxαΓt)∗f,∥Dxα∂tmu(⋅,t)∥q≤Cn,α,m,Q t−2m+∣α∣2−n2(1p−1q)∥f∥p for every t>0, with Cn,α,m,Q the constant produced by the derivative bounds of Spatial and time derivatives pass through heat convolution for positive time and Lp to Lq smoothing estimate for the heat flow. No strong continuity of Htf at t=0 is asserted for q=∞ or p=∞.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, n≥1, 1≤p≤q≤∞, the Young exponent Q with 1Q=1+1q−1p, f∈Lp(Rn), a multi-index α, an integer m≥0, and t>0.

[A1]

Countable Choice is the ambient hypothesis (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

The absolutely convergent representative u(x,t)=∫Γ(x−y,t)f(y) dy is C∞ for t>0, and Dxα∂tku=(Dxα∂tkΓt)∗f, with the Gaussian bound ∣Dxα∂tkΓ(x,t)∣≤Cn,α,kt−(n+∣α∣+2k)/2e−∣x∣2/(8t) (Spatial and time derivatives pass through heat convolution for positive time).

[F2]

For the Young exponent Q and every t>0, ∥Htf∥q≤Cn,p,qt−n2(1p−1q)∥f∥p, and for every multi-index α, ∥DαHtf∥q≤Cn,p,q,αt−∣α∣2−n2(1p−1q)∥f∥p (Lp to Lq smoothing estimate for the heat flow, Spatial derivative estimates for the heat flow).

[F3]

Γ is C∞ on Rn×(0,∞), solves ∂tΓ=ΔxΓ there, and satisfies the parabolic scaling Γ(λx,λ2t)=λ−nΓ(x,t) for λ>0 (Normalisation, parabolic scaling, heat equation and derivative bounds for the heat kernel).

[F4]

Mixed partial derivatives of a sufficiently smooth function commute (Clairaut--Schwarz theorem for continuous second partial derivatives), and Young's convolution inequality ∥K∗f∥q≤∥K∥Q∥f∥p holds when 1Q=1+1q−1p (Young's convolution inequality under Countable Choice).

[F5]

The representative is the one defining Htf, and u is written in the multi-index notation of Ck maps and multi-index derivative notation in Euclidean space (The heat evolution Ht of initial data).

Proof

Given: Countable Choice, n≥1, 1≤p≤q≤∞, the Young exponent Q, f∈Lp(Rn), a multi-index α, an integer m≥0, and t>0.

1.1A1F1F5given

By [F1] the representative u is C∞ on Rn×(0,∞) and Dxα∂tmu=(Dxα∂tmΓt)∗f for every t>0, the integral being absolutely convergent.

2.1step 1.1F3F4given

Since ∂tΓ=ΔxΓ on Rn×(0,∞) by [F3] and all partial derivatives of the C∞ function Γ commute by [F4], induction on m gives ∂tmΓt=ΔxmΓt; substituting into step 1.1 gives Dxα∂tmu=(ΔxmDxαΓt)∗f, and taking α=0, m=1 gives ut=Δu.

3.1step 2.1F1F3given

For every t>0 the scaling identity of [F3], differentiated ∣α∣ times in space and 2m times in space (equivalently m times in time through the equation), gives ΔxmDxαΓ(y,t)=t−n2−m−∣α∣2(ΔxmDxαΓ)(t−1/2y,1); substituting y=t1/2z in the LQ integral and using 1Q=1+1q−1p yields ∥ΔxmDxαΓ(⋅,t)∥Q=t−2m+∣α∣2−n2(1p−1q)Cn,α,m,Q with Cn,α,m,Q:=∥ΔxmDxαΓ(⋅,1)∥Q, which is finite because the bound of [F1] at t=1 majorises the integrand by a multiple of e−∣y∣2/8.

4.1step 2.1step 3.1F4given

Applying Young's inequality [F4] with the kernel K=ΔxmDxαΓt and the exponent relation 1Q=1+1q−1p, and inserting the norm identity of step 3.1, gives ∥Dxα∂tmu(⋅,t)∥q=∥(ΔxmDxαΓt)∗f∥q≤∥ΔxmDxαΓt∥Q∥f∥p≤Cn,α,m,Qt−2m+∣α∣2−n2(1p−1q)∥f∥p.

5.1step 4.1F2given∎

Steps 1.1 and 2.1 give the C∞ smoothness, the equation ut=Δu and the representation Dxα∂tmu=(ΔxmDxαΓt)∗f, while step 4.1 gives the displayed Lq bound with constant Cn,α,m,Q built from the derivative bounds of [F1] and [F2]; nothing in the argument uses or asserts continuity of Htf at t=0, so the caveat for q=∞ or p=∞ is preserved.

CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Spatial smoothing of forcing separated from the observation time

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Let 1≤p≤q≤∞, f∈L1([0,T];Lp(Rn)) in the Bochner sense, 0<ε≤t≤T, and suppose f(s)=0 for almost every s>t−ε. Then the Duhamel contribution at t has a spatial C∞ representative, and for every multi-index α, DαDf(t)=∫0t−εDαHt−sf(s) dswith∥DαDf(t)∥q≤Cα,n,p,q ε−∣α∣2−n2(1p−1q)∫0t−ε∥f(s)∥p ds. This asserts spatial regularity at the chosen time, not differentiability across an active forcing time diagonal.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, 1≤p≤q≤∞, a Bochner integrable f:[0,T]→Lp(Rn) vanishing a.e. after t−ε, and times 0<ε≤t≤T.

[A1]

Countable Choice is the ambient hypothesis (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

The heat potential exists for Bochner L1 forcing, including p=∞, and obeys the contraction estimate (L1 in time estimate for Lp Duhamel forcing, The Duhamel heat potential). The real kernels satisfy Γa∗Γb=Γa+b (The heat kernel semigroup identity Γt∗Γs=Γt+s); thus HaHb=Ha+b for all p by Fubini and Young (Tonelli and Fubini for the completed product, with only almost-everywhere section measurability, Young's convolution inequality under Countable Choice).

[F2]

Bounded linear maps commute with Bochner integrals (Bounded linear maps commute with Bochner integration); strong measurability and integrability of the norm imply Bochner integrability (Bochner integrability criterion), with its norm estimate (Bochner integral norm inequality).

[F3]

Positive-time heat flow has a smooth representative and DαHag=(DαΓa)∗g, with ∥DαHag∥q≤Cn,p,q,αa−∣α∣/2−n(1/p−1/q)/2∥g∥p (Spatial derivative estimates for the heat flow, Spatial and time derivatives pass through heat convolution for positive time).

Proof

Given: Countable Choice, 1≤p≤q≤∞, f Bochner integrable and vanishing a.e. after t−ε, and 0<ε≤t≤T.

1.1A1F1F2F3given

Let a=ε/2 and put g:=∫0t−εHt−s−af(s)ds∈Lp. This integral exists by the forcing estimate [F1], applied at observation time t−a to the forcing cut off after t−ε. Since f=0 a.e. on the omitted interval and HaHt−s−a=Ht−s, [F2] gives Df(t)=Hag. By [F3], it therefore has a spatial C∞ representative, without choosing joint scalar representatives of the original forcing.

2.1step 1.1F2F3given

The bounded map DαHa:Lp→Lq commutes with the integral defining g. Differentiating HaHbh=Ha+bh in space (both sides have the smooth representatives of [F3]) gives DαHaHbh=DαHa+bh. Consequently DαDf(t)=DαHag=∫0t−εDαHt−sf(s)ds in Lq. Strong measurability of this integrand follows by applying the bounded map to the strongly measurable integrand defining g, and its norm is integrable by the next estimate.

3.1step 2.1F2F3given∎

For s≤t−ε, [F3] gives ∥DαHt−sf(s)∥q≤Cn,p,q,αε−∣α∣/2−n(1/p−1/q)/2∥f(s)∥p. Integrating and applying [F2] proves the stated bound. This includes p=∞ and q=∞, since every map used is bounded between the indicated Banach spaces; if t=ε the interval is empty and Df(t)=0. The argument proves spatial regularity at the chosen time and makes no assertion across an active forcing diagonal.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

The complex-time heat kernel on a proper sector

Definition

Assume Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Fix n≥1 and θ∈(0,π/2) and put Sθ:={z∈C∖{0}:∣arg⁡z∣<θ}. For z∈Sθ and x∈Rn define the complex-time heat kernel Γz(x):=(4πz)−n/2exp⁡(−∣x∣24z), where (4πz)−n/2:=exp⁡(−n2Log⁡(4πz)) with the principal logarithm. This is legitimate: z≠0 and Re⁡(4πz)=4π∣z∣cos⁡(arg⁡z)>0 because ∣arg⁡z∣<θ<π/2, so 4πz lies in the slit plane on which the principal logarithm is holomorphic (The principal logarithm is the normalised holomorphic branch on the slit plane, Complex powers defined from a holomorphic logarithm branch) and the power is the complex exponential of The complex exponential by its power series. Then:

(i) Γz∈C∞(Rn)∩L1(Rn) and ∫RnΓz(x) dx=1;

(ii) for every σ∈(0,θ) and every z with ∣arg⁡z∣≤σ,  ∥Γz∥1≤(cos⁡σ)−n/2;

(iii) for real z=t>0, Γt is the heat kernel of The heat kernel on Rn and its causal extension;

(iv) for every fixed x the map z↦Γz(x) is holomorphic on Sθ with ∂zΓz(x)=(−n2z+∣x∣24z2)Γz(x);

(v) for every compact K⋐Sθ there are constants cK,CK>0 with ∣Γz(x)∣≤CKe−cK∣x∣2 and ∣∂zΓz(x)∣≤CK(1+∣x∣2)e−cK∣x∣2 for all z∈K, x∈Rn.

The complex exponential is entire with derivative itself (The complex exponential is entire and its complex derivative is itself), and the complex chain rule is The chain rule for complex derivatives. Its modulus is ∣ew∣=eRe⁡w (exp⁡(x+iy)=ex(cos⁡y+isin⁡y), ∣exp⁡(x+iy)∣=ex, and eiπ+1=0). Smoothness in (i) follows by repeated coordinate differentiation of the exponential and power on Rn (Linearity, product, reciprocal, and quotient rules for complex derivatives, Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: (f+g)′(c)=f′(c)+g′(c), (αf)′(c)=αf′(c), (fg)′(c)=f′(c)g(c)+f(c)g′(c), and (f/g)′(c)=(f′(c)g(c)−f(c)g′(c))/g(c)2 when g(c)≠0, The chain rule, in one line from Carathéodory: if g is differentiable at c and f is differentiable at g(c), then f∘g is differentiable at c with (f∘g)′(c)=f′(g(c)) g′(c), Complex differentiability at a point, the complex derivative, holomorphic functions, and entire functions); square-integrability and the exponential bound in (v) follow from Re⁡(1/z)=cos⁡(arg⁡z)/∣z∣>0 together with the compactness of K and the growth of the exponential against polynomials (The exponential dominates every fixed nonnegative integer power at +∞, Heine-Borel in Rn: with the Euclidean metric a subset of Rn is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded, and the proof by bisection uses no choice principle; the same holds on the real line, Open cover, subcover, compact metric space, and compact subset of a metric space). The remaining assertions are justified in the reminders below.

Remarks

  • The complex Gaussian and the total mass (i). The complex Gaussian identity ∫Rne−a∣x∣2 dx=(π/a)n/2 for Re⁡a>0 follows from the real Gaussian integral The Gaussian integral ∫−∞∞e−x2 dx=π by the scalar identity theorem in a: truncating to [−R,R], the finite-interval holomorphic parameter-integral theorem A jointly continuous finite-interval parameter integral of holomorphic functions is holomorphic makes FR(a)=∫−RRe−ax2dx holomorphic on Re⁡a>0; on a compact parameter set Re⁡a≥c>0 the tails ∫∣x∣>Re−c∣x∣2dx tend to 0 uniformly, so FR→F locally uniformly and Holomorphic functions form a closed subspace for locally uniform convergence makes F holomorphic; on (0,∞) the real Gaussian identity and the substitution x↦x/a give F(a)=π exp⁡(−12Log⁡a), so Identity theorem for holomorphic functions extends this formula to all of Re⁡a>0. Fubini for the absolutely convergent n-dimensional product integral Tonelli and Fubini for the completed product, with only almost-everywhere section measurability gives ∫Rne−a∣x∣2dx=F(a)n=(π/a)n/2; substituting a=1/(4z), and comparing principal branches on the right half-plane, yields ∫Γz=1. This route uses the published holomorphy inputs listed in the dependencies and not the later semigroup law.

  • The L1 bound (ii) and the derivative formula (iv). Writing Re⁡(1/z)=cos⁡(arg⁡z)/∣z∣ gives ∣Γz(x)∣=(4π∣z∣)−n/2e−cos⁡(arg⁡z)∣x∣2/(4∣z∣), and integrating the Gaussian yields exactly (cos⁡arg⁡z)−n/2, which is at most (cos⁡σ)−n/2 when ∣arg⁡z∣≤σ. The formula in (iv) is the product, chain and quotient rule for the holomorphic factors z↦exp⁡(−n2Log⁡(4πz)) and z↦e−∣x∣2/(4z) on the slit plane, where dlog⁡(4πz)/dz=1/z.

  • Relation to the real kernel (iii). For real z=t>0 the principal logarithm is the real logarithm, (4πt)−n/2 is the usual positive power and Γt(x)=(4πt)−n/2e−∣x∣2/(4t) is exactly the heat kernel of The heat kernel on Rn and its causal extension; the compatibility of the real normalisation with Normalisation, parabolic scaling, heat equation and derivative bounds for the heat kernel is what makes (iii) a consistency statement rather than a new definition.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

The complex-time heat kernel is L1-differentiable in its parameter

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Let θ∈(0,π/2) and let Γz be the complex-time heat kernel of The complex-time heat kernel on a proper sector. Then for every z∈Sθ the complex difference quotients converge in L1(Rn): ∥Γz+h−Γzh−∂zΓz∥1⟶0(h→0), so z↦Γz is complex differentiable on Sθ with values in L1(Rn) and derivative ∂zΓz. The convergence is uniform on compact subsets of Sθ.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, θ∈(0,π/2), the complex-time heat kernel Γz on Sθ, a point z∈Sθ and a compact K⋐Sθ.

[A1]

Countable Choice is the ambient hypothesis (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

For every compact K⋐Sθ there are constants cK,CK>0 with ∣Γζ(x)∣≤CKe−cK∣x∣2 and ∣∂ζΓζ(x)∣≤CK(1+∣x∣2)e−cK∣x∣2 for all ζ∈K, x∈Rn (The complex-time heat kernel on a proper sector).

[F2]

For every fixed x the map ζ↦Γζ(x) is holomorphic on Sθ with ∂ζΓζ(x)=(−n2ζ+∣x∣24ζ2)Γζ(x) (The complex-time heat kernel on a proper sector).

[F3]

The fundamental theorem evaluates the integral of a continuous derivative on a real interval (The second fundamental theorem: if G is differentiable on [a,b] with G′=f and f is integrable, then ∫abf=G(b)−G(a)), applied separately to the real and imaginary parts.

[F4]

The complex chain rule is The chain rule for complex derivatives. For holomorphic G, its restriction to the segment has real-parameter derivative hG′(z+sh) directly from the complex derivative's difference quotient.

[F5]

Dominated convergence (Dominated convergence).

Proof

Given: Countable Choice, θ∈(0,π/2), Γz the complex-time kernel, z∈Sθ, and a compact K⋐Sθ.

1.1A1F1F2F3F4given

For a compact K⋐Sθ, choose d>0 such that its closed d-neighbourhood K+ is compact and contained in Sθ. For z∈K and 0<∣h∣<d, the segment z+sh lies in K+. By [F2] and the segment derivative in [F4], [F3] gives (Γz+h(x)−Γz(x))/h=∫01∂zΓz+sh(x)ds. Hence [F1] on K+ bounds the quotient by C(1+∣x∣2)e−c∣x∣2, an integrable function independent of z and h.

2.1step 1.1F2F5given

For every fixed x, the definition's derivative formula of [F2] shows that the difference quotients converge to ∂zΓz(x) as h→0; for z∈K and 0<∣h∣<d as in step 1.1 both the difference quotient and ∂zΓz(x) are bounded by the L1 majorant of step 1.1, so the difference is bounded by 2C(1+∣x∣2)e−c∣x∣2 and converges pointwise to 0; [F5] therefore gives ∥(Γz+h−Γz)/h−∂zΓz∥1→0. Since z was arbitrary, z↦Γz is complex differentiable on Sθ with derivative ∂zΓz, first as a limit in L1.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1F1F2F5given∎

For each fixed x, the explicit derivative ∂zΓz(x) is continuous and therefore uniformly continuous on K+. The segment identity of step 1.1 consequently implies sup⁡z∈K∣(Γz+h(x)−Γz(x))/h−∂zΓz(x)∣→0. This supremum is measurable in x: the integrand is jointly continuous in (z,x) and a maximum over compact K is continuous in x, as follows from uniform continuity on K times a compact spatial neighbourhood. It is bounded by twice the integrable majorant of step 1.1. Dominated convergence [F5] gives convergence of its integral to zero, which bounds the supremum over z∈K of the L1 error. This proves uniform convergence on every compact K, as well as the asserted L1 differentiability.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Complex-time heat operators form a bounded holomorphic semigroup

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Let θ∈(0,π/2) and 1≤p≤∞. For z∈Sθ and f∈Lp(Rn) define Hzf:=Γz∗f, the convolution with the complex-time kernel of The complex-time heat kernel on a proper sector. Then:

(i) Hz is a bounded operator on Lp(Rn) with ∥Hz∥Lp→Lp≤(cos⁡σ)−n/2 whenever ∣arg⁡z∣≤σ<θ;

(ii) HzHw=Hz+w whenever z,w,z+w∈Sθ;

(iii) for every f the map z↦Hzf is complex differentiable on Sθ in the norm of Lp(Rn), with derivative (∂zΓz)∗f; consequently z↦Hz is holomorphic in operator norm on every proper subsector Sσ, σ<θ.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, θ∈(0,π/2), 1≤p≤∞, and f∈Lp(Rn).

[A1]

Countable Choice is the ambient hypothesis (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

The kernel satisfies ∥Γz∥1≤(cos⁡σ)−n/2 for ∣arg⁡z∣≤σ<θ, and ∫RnΓz(x) dx=1 for every z∈Sθ, with ℜ(1/z)>0 throughout the sector (The complex-time heat kernel on a proper sector).

[F2]

The scalar identity theorem extends equality of holomorphic functions from the positive real axis to the connected sector (Identity theorem for holomorphic functions). The sector is a convex cone: z∈Sθ means Re⁡z>0 and ∣Im⁡z∣<tan⁡θRe⁡z, so it is closed under addition. The kernels are bounded functions of space by their Gaussian bounds.

[F3]

The map z↦Γz is complex differentiable into L1(Rn) with derivative ∂zΓz, and the convergence of the difference quotients is uniform on compact subsets of Sθ (The complex-time heat kernel is L1-differentiable in its parameter).

[F4]

Young's convolution inequality in the form used for the heat kernel: for 1≤p≤∞, ∥K∗g∥p≤∥K∥1∥g∥p (Young's convolution inequality under Countable Choice, Convolution of two functions on Rn); for real positive times the same computation with real kernels is the semigroup identity The heat kernel semigroup identity Γt∗Γs=Γt+s (Normalisation, parabolic scaling, heat equation and derivative bounds for the heat kernel).

Proof

Given: Countable Choice, θ∈(0,π/2), 1≤p≤∞, and f∈Lp(Rn).

1.1A1F1F4given

For ∣arg⁡z∣≤σ<θ, [F4] and the L1 bound of [F1] give ∥Hzf∥p=∥Γz∗f∥p≤∥Γz∥1∥f∥p≤(cos⁡σ)−n/2∥f∥p, which is (i).

1.2F1F2F3F4given

Fix x∈Rn and a real w>0. The map z↦(Γz∗Γw)(x) is holomorphic on Sθ: pairing the L1 difference quotients of [F3] with the bounded function y↦Γw(x−y) proves scalar differentiability. The map z↦Γz+w(x) is holomorphic by the kernel definition and [F2]. They agree for real z>0 by [F4], so [F2] gives equality for every complex z∈Sθ. Now fix such a complex z. The same argument with the bounded kernel Γz makes w↦(Γz∗Γw)(x) holomorphic, and w↦Γz+w(x) is holomorphic because addition stays in the sector. They agree for real w>0 by the first application, so the identity theorem gives Γz∗Γw=Γz+w for all z,w∈Sθ. Every scalar convolution is absolutely convergent since one kernel is bounded and the other is integrable.

2.1step 1.2F1F4given

The nonnegative double integral ∬∣Γz(x−y)Γw(y−v)f(v)∣dv dy is finite for almost every x: its Lp bound is at most ∥Γz∥1∥Γw∥1∥f∥p by two applications of Young [F4], with the pointwise bound for p=∞. Thus Fubini (Tonelli and Fubini for the completed product, with only almost-everywhere section measurability) and step 1.2 give HzHwf=(Γz∗Γw)∗f=Γz+w∗f=Hz+wf as Lp classes. This proves (ii), including both exponent endpoints.

2.2step 1.1F3F4F5given

By [F3] and [F4], ∥(Hz+hf−Hzf)/h−(∂zΓz)∗f∥p≤∥f∥p∥(Γz+h−Γz)/h−∂zΓz∥1→0, so z↦Hzf is norm differentiable with the stated derivative; the convergence of the difference quotients in L1 is uniform on compact subsets of Sθ by [F3], so the same estimate gives local convergence in operator norm on every proper subsector, i.e. z↦Hz is holomorphic in operator norm on Sσ, σ<θ.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1step 2.2given∎

Steps 1.1, 2.1 and 2.2 establish the boundedness estimate (i), the semigroup law (ii) and the differentiability statement (iii) with its operator-norm consequence.

RemarkRemark: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

The heat operator family is an analytic semigroup in the later abstract language

Remark

Orientation only. For 1≤p<∞, the family z↦Hz constructed explicitly in Complex-time heat operators form a bounded holomorphic semigroup is the concrete Gaussian instance of what the library's later abstract treatment of analytic semigroups will call a bounded holomorphic (analytic) C0-semigroup on a sector: bounded on every proper subsector, strongly continuous on the positive real axis, and multiplicative in the sector. Concretely, the kernel and its estimates are those of The complex-time heat kernel on a proper sector; the sectorial bound ∥Hz∥Lp→Lp≤(cos⁡σ)−n/2 on ∣arg⁡z∣≤σ<θ and the law HzHw=Hz+w are clauses (i) and (ii) of that theorem, its clause (iii) gives the holomorphy in operator norm, and the strong continuity at the vertex along the positive axis, for 1≤p<∞, is that of the heat flow of The heat evolution Ht of initial data supplied by The heat Cauchy problem for Lp data.

This page does not use that abstract notion as a premise, does not identify the generator Δ with an unbounded operator domain, and makes no claim about maximal regularity, resolvent sectors, or the Hille–Yosida representation in the abstract language. The later page is responsible for the abstract definition and for the generator theory; here only the explicit kernel family of The complex-time heat kernel on a proper sector and its estimates are used.

For p=∞ the same family is bounded and operator-norm holomorphic at positive complex times, but is not a C0-semigroup on all of L∞; the vertex continuity assertion above is restricted to finite p. Indeed, for f=1[0,∞) on R, evenness and unit mass give Htf(0)=1/2. Continuity of Htf makes ∣Htf(x)−1∣>η on a positive-length interval 0<x<δ for every η<1/2; hence ∥Htf−f∥∞≥1/2 for every t>0.

For finite p, continuity at the vertex also holds within each proper subsector. With ε>0 real and ∣arg⁡z∣≤σ, the semigroup law gives ∥Hzf−f∥p≤((cos⁡σ)−n/2+1)∥f−Hεf∥p+∥Hz+εf−Hεf∥p. For fixed ε, the last term tends to zero as z→0 by positive-parameter operator holomorphy; then ε↓0 controls the first term by the finite-p real-time continuity cited above. This supplies the vertex continuity of the analytic C0 terminology.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

L2 normalisation of the sine modes on an interval

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. For all integers k,l≥1, ∫0πsin⁡(kx)sin⁡(lx) dx=π2 δkl. In particular ∥sin⁡(k⋅)∥L2(0,π)=π/2.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice and integers k,l≥1, and the trigonometric functions of the power-series definition.

[A1]

Countable Choice is the ambient hypothesis inherited through the L² inner-product dictionary [F5] (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

Angle addition: sin⁡(x+y)=sin⁡xcos⁡y+cos⁡xsin⁡y and cos⁡(x+y)=cos⁡xcos⁡y−sin⁡xsin⁡y (The addition formulas for sine and cosine).

[F2]

sin⁡′=cos⁡ and cos⁡′=−sin⁡, with sin⁡0=0 (The derivatives of sine and cosine are cosine and minus sine).

[F3]

sin⁡x=0 exactly for x=mπ, m∈Z (The zero sets of sine and cosine and the least positive common period 2 pi).

[F4]

On an order-convex I with at least two elements, a continuous function has primitives, and for a<b in I and any primitive G one has ∫abf=G(b)−G(a) (Every continuous function on an interval has a primitive; two primitives differ by a constant; and ∫abf=G(b)−G(a) for any primitive G).

[F5]

L2(0,π) is the quotient space of The space Lp(μ) as the quotient by null functions, and under its Countable Choice hypothesis the integral pairing of L2 with the integral pairing is a Hilbert space satisfies ⟨f,f⟩=∥f∥L2(0,π)2=∫0π∣f∣2; Countable Choice is inherited from that supplier (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

Proof

Given: Countable Choice and integers k,l≥1.

1.1F1given

Combining the two addition formulas [F1] gives the product-to-sum identity 2sin⁡(kx)sin⁡(lx)=cos⁡((k−l)x)−cos⁡((k+l)x) for all real x; when k=l it reads 2sin⁡2(kx)=1−cos⁡(2kx), which is the same identity with cos⁡(0)=1.

2.1step 1.1F2F3F4F6given

For every nonzero integer m the function x↦sin⁡(mx)/m is a primitive of x↦cos⁡(mx) on [0,π] by [F2] and [F6], so the evaluation clause of [F4] ([F3] for the vanishing of sine at the endpoints) gives ∫0πcos⁡(mx) dx=sin⁡(mπ)−sin⁡0m=0; also ∫0π1 dx=π.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1given

If k≠l then both k−l and k+l are nonzero integers, so step 2.1 and step 1.1 give ∫0πsin⁡(kx)sin⁡(lx) dx=12(0−0)=0; if k=l then k−l=0 and k+l=2k≠0, so ∫0πsin⁡(kx)2dx=12(π−0)=π2. Hence the displayed identity holds for all integers k,l≥1.

4.1step 3.1A1F5given∎

Taking k=l and using the inner-product dictionary [F5] gives ∥sin⁡(k⋅)∥L2(0,π)2=∫0πsin⁡(kx)2dx=π2 and hence ∥sin⁡(k⋅)∥L2(0,π)=π/2. The integral computation of steps 1.1–3.1 is choice-free; the only use of Countable Choice is the inheritance through [F5] in this last step, needed to read the quotient norm as the integral pairing.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

The backward heat solution map is unbounded

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Let T>0 and consider the heat equation ut=uxx on (0,π)×(0,T] with homogeneous Dirichlet boundary data u(0,t)=u(π,t)=0.

Well-definedness of the terminal-to-initial map. If a C4,2 function w on [0,π]×[0,T] solves this problem with w(x,T)=0 for all x, then w≡0 (Backward uniqueness for the heat equation on a bounded interval). Hence on the class of C4,2 solutions the terminal data determine the solution, and the map S sending a terminal datum u(⋅,T) to the initial state u(⋅,0) is well defined.

Unboundedness. For every integer k≥1 the function uk(x,t):=ek2(T−t)sin⁡(kx) is a classical solution of ut=uxx on (0,π)×(0,T] with uk(0,t)=uk(π,t)=0, initial state uk(⋅,0)=ek2Tsin⁡(k⋅) and terminal data uk(⋅,T)=sin⁡(k⋅). Consequently there is no constant C<∞ with ∥u(⋅,0)∥L2(0,π)≤C ∥u(⋅,T)∥L2(0,π) for all C4,2 solutions u of this problem: the solutions u~k(x,t)=e−k2tsin⁡(kx) have terminal data gk=e−k2Tsin⁡(k⋅) with ∥gk∥2=π/2 e−k2T→0 while ∥u~k(⋅,0)∥2=π/2 for every k. Since Sgk=sin⁡(k⋅)=ek2Tgk, the terminal-to-initial map multiplies the k-th sine mode by ek2T and is unbounded with respect to the L2(0,π) norms on its domain and range: the backward heat problem on a bounded interval has no norm-stable solution operator, and the amplification factor of the k-th Dirichlet mode is exactly ek2T.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, T>0, the interval (0,π), and an integer k≥1.

[A1]

Countable Choice is the ambient hypothesis, inherited through the backward-uniqueness and L2 suppliers (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

Backward uniqueness: a C4,2 function on [0,π]×[0,T] satisfying wt=wxx, w(0,t)=w(π,t)=0 and w(x,T)=0 vanishes identically (Backward uniqueness for the heat equation on a bounded interval).

[F3]

The L2(0,π) inner product is ⟨f,g⟩=∫0πfg on the quotient space of The space Lp(μ) as the quotient by null functions, with ∥f∥22=∫0πf2 (L2 with the integral pairing is a Hilbert space), and ∥sin⁡(k⋅)∥2=π/2 (L2 normalisation of the sine modes on an interval).

[F4]

e−k2T→0 as k→∞, faster than every polynomial (The exponential dominates every fixed nonnegative integer power at +∞).

Proof

Given: Countable Choice, T>0 and k≥1.

1.1A1F1given

If u1,u2 are C4,2 solutions with ui(0,t)=ui(π,t)=0 and the same terminal data u1(⋅,T)=u2(⋅,T), then w:=u1−u2 is C4,2 and satisfies wt=wxx, w(0,t)=w(π,t)=0 and w(x,T)=0, so [F1] gives w≡0; hence the terminal-to-initial map S is well defined on the terminal data of the class.

1.2F2given

For every k≥1 the function uk(x,t)=ek2(T−t)sin⁡(kx) has ∂tuk=−k2uk and, by [F2], ∂x2uk=−k2sin⁡(kx)ek2(T−t)=−k2uk, with boundary values uk(0,t)=sin⁡0=0 and uk(π,t)=sin⁡(kπ)=0; the same computation with e−k2t shows that u~k(x,t)=e−k2tsin⁡(kx) is a solution with u~k(⋅,0)=sin⁡(k⋅) and terminal data gk=e−k2Tsin⁡(k⋅).

2.1step 1.2F3given

By [F3] and scaling by the positive factor e−k2T, ∥gk∥2=e−k2T∥sin⁡(k⋅)∥2=π/2 e−k2T, while ∥u~k(⋅,0)∥2=∥sin⁡(k⋅)∥2=π/2.

2.2step 1.2F4given

By [F4] the sequence e−k2T tends to 0; consequently the terminal data gk of step 1.2 satisfy ∥gk∥2=π/2 e−k2T→0 while ∥u~k(⋅,0)∥2=π/2 stays constant.

3.1step 1.1step 1.2step 2.2F3given∎

Since gk are admissible terminal data with ∥gk∥2→0 but Sgk=sin⁡(k⋅) and ∥sin⁡(k⋅)∥2=π/2 for every k, no finite constant C satisfies ∥u(⋅,0)∥2≤C∥u(⋅,T)∥2 on the class, so S is unbounded; explicitly S multiplies the k-th sine mode by ek2T, which is the amplification factor asserted.

CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Compactly supported nonzero terminal profiles are outside the heat range

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Let n≥1, 1≤p≤∞, f∈Lp(Rn) and t>0, and let u be the everywhere-defined representative of the heat evolution Htf supplied by Spatial analyticity of heat flow at positive time. If u has compact support, then u≡0 and Htf=0 as an element of Lp(Rn). Consequently no nonzero compactly supported element of Lp(Rn) equals Htf for any such f and t. The same vanishing conclusion holds when u vanishes almost everywhere outside some compact set.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, n≥1, 1≤p≤∞, f∈Lp(Rn), t>0, the representative u of Htf, and a point x∈Rn.

[A1]

Countable Choice is the hypothesis carried by the analyticity, integration and measure-theoretic suppliers below (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

The representative u of Htf is real analytic on Rn, and for complex data its real and imaginary parts are real analytic; in particular u is continuous and at every centre its Taylor series converges absolutely in every direction (Spatial analyticity of heat flow at positive time).

[F2]

If I⊆R is an open interval and g,h:I→R are real analytic with agreement set having an accumulation point lying inside I, then g=h throughout I (Two real-analytic functions on an open interval that agree on a set with an accumulation point in that interval agree throughout the interval).

[F3]

A nonempty open subset of Rn contains a nondegenerate axis-parallel box and therefore has positive Lebesgue measure; hence a continuous function that vanishes almost everywhere on such a set vanishes at every one of its points. By A box in Rn with parameters ai≤bi is Lebesgue measurable of measure ∏i<n(bi−ai), whichever of its faces are included, that box has measure equal to the positive product of its side lengths; continuity turns a nonzero value into a nonzero lower bound on such a box.

Proof

Given: Countable Choice, n≥1, 1≤p≤∞, f∈Lp(Rn), t>0, the representative u of Htf, and x∈Rn.

1.1A1F1given

Let e1 be the first standard basis vector and put g(s):=u(x+se1) for s∈R. At a centre c∈R, the expansion of [F1] about x+ce1 converges absolutely in every direction, so substituting the displacement σe1 turns it into a one-variable power series ∑k≥0akσk that converges absolutely for every real σ and sums to g(c+σ); hence g is real analytic on R. For complex-valued u the same argument is applied to the real and imaginary parts of g, which are real analytic by [F1].

2.1givenstep 1.1algebra

Assume now that u has compact support. Then {u≠0} is bounded, so there is R>0 with x+se1∉{u≠0} whenever ∣s∣>R+∣x∣, and for those s the definition of g gives g(s)=0.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1F2given

Suppose first that u is real-valued and let R be as in step 2.1. The zero set of g contains the open interval (R+∣x∣,∞), so the point c:=R+∣x∣+1 is an accumulation point, lying in the interval I:=R, of the agreement set of g and the zero function; both are real analytic on I by step 1.1, so [F2] gives g≡0 on R, and evaluating at s=0 gives u(x)=0.

4.1step 2.1step 3.1F1given

Suppose instead that u is complex-valued with compact support. Then Re⁡u and Im⁡u are real analytic by [F1] and vanish outside the same bounded set, so step 3.1 applied to each of them gives Re⁡u(x)=0 and Im⁡u(x)=0; hence u(x)=0.

5.1step 3.1step 4.1given

Since x∈Rn was arbitrary, steps 3.1 and 4.1 show that a compactly supported representative vanishes identically, so the class Htf is the zero class of Lp(Rn); consequently no nonzero compactly supported element of Lp(Rn) equals Htf for data and time as in the statement.

6.1step 5.1F1F3given∎

Finally assume only that u vanishes almost everywhere outside a compact set K. If x∉K, choose ρ>0 with the ball B(x,ρ) disjoint from K; then u=0 almost everywhere on the nonempty open set B(x,ρ). If u(x)≠0, continuity of u from [F1] would give ∣u∣>∣u(x)∣/2>0 on a smaller ball, so that this ball contains no point where u vanishes, contradicting [F3]. Hence u=0 on Rn∖K, so u has compact support and step 5.1 applies.

RemarkRemark: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicableOpen item page →

Backward ill-posedness does not mean universal nonexistence

Remark

Orientation only. Assume Countable Choice and fix T>0. The backward heat solution map is unbounded shows that the terminal-to-initial map on the terminal profiles of C4,2 interval Dirichlet heat solutions is unbounded with respect to the L2(0,π) norms; this is a statement about continuity and stability, not about existence. The terminal data sin⁡(k⋅), for integers k≥1, do have backward solutions (the modes uk of The backward heat solution map is unbounded), and so does every finite sine sum, by finite linear combination of these solutions. More generally, whenever a forward interval Dirichlet heat solution u exists on [0,T] with initial profile f, its terminal profile g=u(⋅,T) admits a backward extension on that interval: the same u, with initial profile f. This range description asserts no existence for arbitrary initial or terminal data. The failure is therefore that arbitrarily small terminal perturbations can correspond to order-one initial states (The backward heat solution map is unbounded), and on general domains the backward solution operator need not be surjective onto any given data class. No claim of universal nonexistence and no well-posedness claim is made here.

The well-definedness half of the picture is also worth recording: on the C4,2 class with zero lateral data the terminal data determine the solution, by Backward uniqueness for the heat equation on a bounded interval, so ill-posedness here is exactly the failure of a uniform norm bound, with the amplification ratio ek2T of the k-th sine mode (L2 normalisation of the sine modes on an interval) measuring that failure; no further existence or regularity claim is made.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

None yet.

Sources