Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Backward uniqueness for the heat equation on a bounded interval

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Let T>0, Q=(0,π)×(0,T], and say that a function w:Q‾→R is of class C4,2(Q‾) when it is continuous on Q‾ and all ordered partial derivatives containing at most four x derivatives and at most two t derivatives exist on Q and extend continuously to Q‾. Suppose w∈C4,2(Q‾) satisfies wt=wxxin Q,w(0,t)=w(π,t)=0 (0≤t≤T),w(x,T)=0 (0≤x≤π). Then w≡0 on Q‾. No hypothesis on the initial face t=0 is imposed: the vanishing is forced by the lateral and terminal conditions alone. Consequently two solutions of the interval Dirichlet problem in this class with zero lateral data and the same terminal data coincide, and the terminal-to-initial map is well defined on the class of terminal data of such solutions.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, T>0, Q=(0,π)×(0,T], and w∈C4,2(Q‾) with wt=wxx in Q, w(0,t)=w(π,t)=0 for 0≤t≤T and w(x,T)=0 for 0≤x≤π.

[A1]

Countable Choice is the ambient hypothesis (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

If f satisfies the hypotheses of the differentiation-under-the-integral theorem, then F(t)=∫f(x,t) dμ(x) is differentiable with F′=∫∂tf dμ (Differentiation under the integral sign).

[F2]

For u,v differentiable on [a,b] with integrable derivatives, ∫abu v′=u(b)v(b)−u(a)v(a)−∫abu′v (If u,v are differentiable on [a,b] with u′,v′ integrable, then ∫abuv′=u(b)v(b)−u(a)v(a)−∫abu′v).

[F3]

A continuous function on [a,b] is bounded and Riemann integrable (A continuous function on [a,b] is Riemann integrable, by Heine-Cantor and Riemann's criterion).

[F4]

A bounded Riemann integrable function on [a,b] is Lebesgue integrable with the same integral (A bounded Riemann integrable function on a closed bounded interval is Lebesgue measurable and has the same integral).

[F5]

∫∣fg∣≤∥f∥2∥g∥2 for f,g∈L2 (Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for L2).

[F6]

A twice differentiable function on an open interval is convex exactly when its second derivative is nonnegative (A twice-differentiable function on an open interval is convex if and only if its second derivative is nonnegative).

[F8]

log⁡:(0,∞)→R is continuous, strictly increasing and onto R, with log⁡(xy)=log⁡x+log⁡y and log⁡1=0 (Order, continuity, range, and the product, quotient, and reciprocal laws for the natural logarithm).

[F11]

Dominated convergence (Dominated convergence).

Proof

Given: Countable Choice, T>0, w∈C4,2(Q‾) with wt=wxx in Q, w(0,t)=w(π,t)=0 for 0≤t≤T, and w(x,T)=0 for 0≤x≤π.

1.1A1F3F4F10F11given

Define E(t):=12∫0πw(x,t)2 dx for t∈[0,T]; the integrand is continuous on the compact interval, hence Lebesgue integrable by [F3] and [F4]. If tk→t in [0,T], then w(x,tk)2→w(x,t)2 for every x by continuity of w on Q‾, and [F10] bounds w by some M<∞, so the constant 4M2 dominates all integrands and [F11] gives E(tk)→E(t); thus E is continuous on [0,T].

1.2F1F10given

For fixed t∈(0,T) the map x↦w(x,t)2 is integrable, for every x the map s↦w(x,s)2 is differentiable on (0,T) with derivative 2w(x,s)wt(x,s), and [F10] bounds w and wt by constants M,M1<∞, so ∣2wwt∣≤2MM1 everywhere; [F1] therefore applies and gives E′(t)=12∫0π2w(x,t)wt(x,t) dx=∫0πw(x,t)wt(x,t) dx for every t∈(0,T).

2.1step 1.2F2F3F4given

On (0,T) the equation wt=wxx turns step 1.2 into E′(t)=∫0πw wxx dx; the functions x↦w(x,t) and x↦wx(x,t) are continuously differentiable on [0,π] with continuous, hence integrable derivatives by [F3], so [F2] gives ∫0πw wxx dx=[w wx]0π−∫0πwx2 dx=−∫0πwx(x,t)2 dx, the boundary term vanishing because w(0,t)=w(π,t)=0 for all t; the Riemann integrals equal the Lebesgue integrals by [F4], so E′(t)=−∫0πwx(x,t)2 dx≤0.

2.2step 1.2F1F2F3F4F10given

Applying [F1] to x↦wx(x,t)2, with wx and wxt bounded on the compact rectangle by [F10], gives E′′(t)=−2∫0πwx(x,t)wxt(x,t) dx for t∈(0,T); [F2] applied to u=wx(⋅,t) and v=wt(⋅,t) gives ∫0πwxwxt=[wxwt]0π−∫0πwxxwt=−∫0πwxxwt dx, since wt(0,t)=wt(π,t)=0 by differentiating the boundary identities in t: the continuous extensions of wt are those derivatives, since the interior identity w(x,b)−w(x,a)=∫abwt(x,s)ds passes to x=0,π by uniform continuity on [a,b]; substituting wxx=wt yields E′′(t)=2∫0πwt(x,t)2 dx≥0.

3.1step 1.2step 2.2F5F6F7F9F12F13given

By [F5] and steps 1.2 and 2.2, E′(t)2=(∫0πwwt)2≤(∫0πw2)(∫0πwt2)=E(t)E′′(t) for t∈(0,T); hence on every interval on which E>0, the function L:=log⁡∘E is twice differentiable with L′=E′/E and L′′=E′′/E−(E′/E)2≥0 by [F9] and [F12], so L is convex there by [F6] and [F7].

4.1step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1F7F8F13given

If E were positive somewhere, continuity and E(T)=0 would give t0∈(0,T) with E(t0)>0. By step 2.1 and [F13], E is nonincreasing; fix s∈(0,t0), so E(s)>0. The nonempty closed set {t∈[t0,T]:E(t)=0} has a least element b>t0, with E>0 on [s,b) and E(b)=0. For t0<t<b, convexity from step 3.1 yields L(t0)≤t−t0t−sL(s)+t0−st−sL(t). As t↑b, L(t)→−∞ by continuity of E and [F8], its coefficient tends to (t0−s)/(b−s)>0, and the other term is bounded. This contradicts the finite L(t0). Hence E≡0 on [0,T].

5.1step 4.1given∎

Since E≡0 and E(t)=12∫0πw(x,t)2dx with a nonnegative continuous integrand, w(x,t)=0 for every x∈[0,π] and every t∈[0,T]: if w(x0,t)≠0, continuity in x gives w2>0 on a nondegenerate interval, making E(t)>0. Thus w≡0 on Q‾; if u1,u2 are two C4,2 solutions with the same terminal data and zero lateral data, their difference satisfies the hypotheses, so u1=u2 and the terminal-to-initial map on the terminal data of such solutions is well defined.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

124 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources